What's Really New with NewSQL?

Andrew Pavlo, Matthew Aslett
{"title":"What's Really New with NewSQL?","authors":"Andrew Pavlo, Matthew Aslett","doi":"10.1145/3003665.3003674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A new class of database management systems (DBMSs) called NewSQL tout their ability to scale modern on-line transaction processing (OLTP) workloads in a way that is not possible with legacy systems. The term NewSQL was first used by one of the authors of this article in a 2011 business analysis report discussing the rise of new database systems as challengers to these established vendors (Oracle, IBM, Microsoft). The other author was working on what became one of the first examples of a NewSQL DBMS. Since then several companies and research projects have used this term (rightly and wrongly) to describe their systems.\n Given that relational DBMSs have been around for over four decades, it is justifiable to ask whether the claim of NewSQL's superiority is actually true or whether it is simply marketing. If they are indeed able to get better performance, then the next question is whether there is anything scientifically new about them that enables them to achieve these gains or is it just that hardware has advanced so much that now the bottlenecks from earlier years are no longer a problem.\n To do this, we first discuss the history of databases to understand how NewSQL systems came about. We then provide a detailed explanation of what the term NewSQL means and the different categories of systems that fall under this definition.","PeriodicalId":21740,"journal":{"name":"SIGMOD Rec.","volume":"3 4 1","pages":"45-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"122","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGMOD Rec.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3003665.3003674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 122

Abstract

A new class of database management systems (DBMSs) called NewSQL tout their ability to scale modern on-line transaction processing (OLTP) workloads in a way that is not possible with legacy systems. The term NewSQL was first used by one of the authors of this article in a 2011 business analysis report discussing the rise of new database systems as challengers to these established vendors (Oracle, IBM, Microsoft). The other author was working on what became one of the first examples of a NewSQL DBMS. Since then several companies and research projects have used this term (rightly and wrongly) to describe their systems. Given that relational DBMSs have been around for over four decades, it is justifiable to ask whether the claim of NewSQL's superiority is actually true or whether it is simply marketing. If they are indeed able to get better performance, then the next question is whether there is anything scientifically new about them that enables them to achieve these gains or is it just that hardware has advanced so much that now the bottlenecks from earlier years are no longer a problem. To do this, we first discuss the history of databases to understand how NewSQL systems came about. We then provide a detailed explanation of what the term NewSQL means and the different categories of systems that fall under this definition.
NewSQL的真正新特性是什么?
一类新的数据库管理系统(dbms)称为NewSQL,它们能够扩展现代联机事务处理(OLTP)工作负载,这是遗留系统无法做到的。本文的一位作者在2011年的一份业务分析报告中首次使用了术语NewSQL,该报告讨论了新数据库系统的兴起,这些新数据库系统是对现有供应商(Oracle、IBM、Microsoft)的挑战。另一位作者正在研究后来成为NewSQL DBMS的第一个示例之一的东西。从那时起,一些公司和研究项目(正确或错误地)使用这个术语来描述他们的系统。考虑到关系dbms已经存在了40多年,我们有理由问一下,NewSQL的优越性究竟是真的,还是仅仅是一种营销手段。如果他们确实能够获得更好的性能,那么下一个问题是,是否有什么科学上的新东西使他们能够实现这些进步,或者仅仅是因为硬件已经进步了很多,现在早些年的瓶颈不再是一个问题。为此,我们首先讨论数据库的历史,以了解NewSQL系统是如何产生的。然后,我们将详细解释术语NewSQL的含义以及属于该定义的系统的不同类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信