The Qinghua “Jinteng” Manuscript: What it Does Not Tell Us about the Duke of Zhou

IF 0.6 3区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
M. Gren
{"title":"The Qinghua “Jinteng” Manuscript: What it Does Not Tell Us about the Duke of Zhou","authors":"M. Gren","doi":"10.1163/15685322-10245P01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study suggests that the so-called “Jinteng” manuscript held by Qinghua University should be read independently of its received counterpart. When read on its own terms, the manuscript provides a straightforward account of rituals surrounding the Duke of Zhou’s ascension to the throne after the demise of King Wu. As such it represents a continuation of King Wu’s abdication in favor of his meritorious brother, as recorded in the Yi Zhou shu . Read in this light, the fourth century BCE manuscript provides further evidence for the prominence of abdication doctrines during the Warring States period, an intellectual tradition that was deemed subversive in the early empire and became gradually obliterated over the course of the Qin-Han dynasties.\u2029Cet article propose de lire le manuscrit dit “Jinteng” conserve a l’universite Qinghua independamment des textes recus qui lui correspondent. Considere par lui-meme, le manuscrit offre une relation claire des rituels ayant entoure l’accession au trone du duc de Zhou apres la mort du roi Wu. De ce fait, il represente le prolongement de l’abdication du roi Wu en faveur de son vertueux frere telle qu’elle est relatee dans le Yi Zhou shu . Considere sous cet angle, ce manuscrit du IVe siecle avant notre ere offre de nouveaux arguments en faveur de l’importance des doctrines sur l’abdication a l’epoque des Royaumes Combattants, alors que cette tradition intellectuelle etait consideree comme subversive au debut de l’empire et qu’elle est progressivement tombee dans l’oubli sous les Qin et les Han.","PeriodicalId":23193,"journal":{"name":"T'oung Pao","volume":"40 1","pages":"291-320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"T'oung Pao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685322-10245P01","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study suggests that the so-called “Jinteng” manuscript held by Qinghua University should be read independently of its received counterpart. When read on its own terms, the manuscript provides a straightforward account of rituals surrounding the Duke of Zhou’s ascension to the throne after the demise of King Wu. As such it represents a continuation of King Wu’s abdication in favor of his meritorious brother, as recorded in the Yi Zhou shu . Read in this light, the fourth century BCE manuscript provides further evidence for the prominence of abdication doctrines during the Warring States period, an intellectual tradition that was deemed subversive in the early empire and became gradually obliterated over the course of the Qin-Han dynasties.
Cet article propose de lire le manuscrit dit “Jinteng” conserve a l’universite Qinghua independamment des textes recus qui lui correspondent. Considere par lui-meme, le manuscrit offre une relation claire des rituels ayant entoure l’accession au trone du duc de Zhou apres la mort du roi Wu. De ce fait, il represente le prolongement de l’abdication du roi Wu en faveur de son vertueux frere telle qu’elle est relatee dans le Yi Zhou shu . Considere sous cet angle, ce manuscrit du IVe siecle avant notre ere offre de nouveaux arguments en faveur de l’importance des doctrines sur l’abdication a l’epoque des Royaumes Combattants, alors que cette tradition intellectuelle etait consideree comme subversive au debut de l’empire et qu’elle est progressivement tombee dans l’oubli sous les Qin et les Han.
清华“金坛”手稿:它没有告诉我们的关于周公的事情
本研究认为,清华大学持有的所谓“金腾”手稿应独立于其收到的副本进行阅读。如果按原样阅读,这份手稿提供了一个关于周公在武王死后登基的仪式的简单描述。就像《易州书》中记载的那样,它代表了武王退位的延续,支持他有功绩的兄弟。从这个角度来看,公元前4世纪的手稿为战国时期退位学说的突出地位提供了进一步的证据,这一思想传统在帝国早期被认为是颠覆性的,并在秦汉时期逐渐被抹去。
文章中提出了“金腾”保留清华大学独立文字稿的原稿。考虑到这一点,我们的手稿提供了一种新的关系,即礼仪和随从的关系,即“周公爵的登基”和“吴公爵的登基”。De ce fait,将代表le '退位的l ' ab退位的l ' ab王位的l ' ab王位的l ' ab王位的l ' ab王位的l ' ab王位的l ' ab王位的l ' ab王位的l ' ab王位的l ' ab王位的l ' ab王位的l '。考虑到sous et angle,《六世纪先锋派手稿》提供了新的论据,支持l '重要性学说,支持l '退位,支持l 'epoque des Royaumes combatters,支持l '传统知识分子,认为共产主义具有颠覆性,支持l '帝国的首次登场,支持l ' lele est进步,支持l 'oubli sous,支持秦汉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
T'oung Pao
T'oung Pao ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信