Crisis in Sport: A Sport Fan’s Perception Toward Sport Celebrity Scandals

Q1 Social Sciences
Geumchan Hwang
{"title":"Crisis in Sport: A Sport Fan’s Perception Toward Sport Celebrity Scandals","authors":"Geumchan Hwang","doi":"10.31907/2617-121x.2019.03.01.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study was to examine how sport fans differently perceive on-field scandals and off-field scandals. To examine sport fans’ perceptions toward four types of on-field scandals (doping, match-fixing, embezzlement, and misuse of inside information) and four types of off-field scandals (sexual misconduct, violence/criminal charge, alcoholism/drug abuse, and illegal gambling), 128 samples were collected from sport management students in Midwest areas in the United States using online survey. The results of the study revealed participants perceived violence/criminal charge and sexual misconduct as the most deteriorate scandals. In addition, there was a positive correlation between the fan perceptions toward on-field scandals and off-field scandals. Finally, there was a significant mean difference of fan perceptions toward scandals between on-field scandals and off-field scandals. That is, fans’ negative perceptions toward on-field scandals were higher than those of off-field scandals. This study contributes to understanding how sport fans negatively perceive sport celebrity scandals and why sport organizations should consider developing an effective communication strategy. Keywords: Crisis, scandals, fan perception, on-field, off-field.","PeriodicalId":34327,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31907/2617-121x.2019.03.01.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to examine how sport fans differently perceive on-field scandals and off-field scandals. To examine sport fans’ perceptions toward four types of on-field scandals (doping, match-fixing, embezzlement, and misuse of inside information) and four types of off-field scandals (sexual misconduct, violence/criminal charge, alcoholism/drug abuse, and illegal gambling), 128 samples were collected from sport management students in Midwest areas in the United States using online survey. The results of the study revealed participants perceived violence/criminal charge and sexual misconduct as the most deteriorate scandals. In addition, there was a positive correlation between the fan perceptions toward on-field scandals and off-field scandals. Finally, there was a significant mean difference of fan perceptions toward scandals between on-field scandals and off-field scandals. That is, fans’ negative perceptions toward on-field scandals were higher than those of off-field scandals. This study contributes to understanding how sport fans negatively perceive sport celebrity scandals and why sport organizations should consider developing an effective communication strategy. Keywords: Crisis, scandals, fan perception, on-field, off-field.
体育危机:一个体育迷对体育名人丑闻的看法
这项研究的目的是研究体育迷对场上丑闻和场外丑闻的不同看法。为了研究体育迷对四种场上丑闻(兴奋剂、假球、挪用公款和滥用内幕消息)和四种场外丑闻(性行为不端、暴力/刑事指控、酗酒/滥用药物和非法赌博)的看法,采用在线调查的方式,从美国中西部地区的体育管理专业学生中收集了128个样本。研究结果显示,参与者认为暴力/刑事指控和性行为不端是最糟糕的丑闻。此外,球迷对球场内丑闻和场外丑闻的认知存在正相关。最后,球迷对球场内丑闻和场外丑闻的认知存在显著的均值差异。也就是说,球迷对场内丑闻的负面认知高于场外丑闻。本研究有助于了解体育迷如何消极地看待体育名人丑闻,以及为什么体育组织应该考虑制定有效的传播策略。关键词:危机,丑闻,球迷感知,场内,场外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信