Relationship between edema and intracranial pressure following intracerebral hemorrhage in rat

Anna C J Kalisvaart, Natasha A. Bahr, F. Colbourne
{"title":"Relationship between edema and intracranial pressure following intracerebral hemorrhage in rat","authors":"Anna C J Kalisvaart, Natasha A. Bahr, F. Colbourne","doi":"10.3389/fstro.2023.1155937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) is a potentially fatal consequence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). As the mass of the hematoma and regional edema builds, ICP rises and becomes increasingly variable acutely after stroke. High ICP may worsen cellular injury and edema by impairing local tissue perfusion, fueling a cycle that may ultimately cause fatality through ischemia and brain herniation. Time spent above an ICP of 20 mmHg often predicts a greater risk of death and disability following ICH. Compensatory mechanisms combat rising ICP. Classically, these include cerebrospinal fluid volume loss and cerebrovascular autoregulation, such as a reduction in the volume of venous blood. Additional mechanisms such as brain tissue compliance and skull volume compensation may also contribute. Compensatory compliance mechanisms are limited, and they vary by age and many other factors. Animal models of ICH are widely used to assess these variables and to gauge putative therapeutics. Most often those studies rely upon simple measures of edema, which may not accurately predict ICP data. Thus, we analyzed our past studies characterizing ICP, edema, and tissue compliance responses to striatal ICH in rat, including the collagenase (C-ICH) and whole blood models (WB-ICH). We found that both ICH models raised ICP, with greater effects in the C-ICH model, which may thus better reflect clinical findings of concern. Importantly, measures of edema, such as in the damaged hemisphere, on their own are not predictive of average or peak ICP response within either model, unless assessing across a very wide range of injury severities, or when including non-stroke animals. We caution against using edema data as a surrogate measure of mass effect and ICP following ICH.","PeriodicalId":73108,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in stroke","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in stroke","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fstro.2023.1155937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) is a potentially fatal consequence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). As the mass of the hematoma and regional edema builds, ICP rises and becomes increasingly variable acutely after stroke. High ICP may worsen cellular injury and edema by impairing local tissue perfusion, fueling a cycle that may ultimately cause fatality through ischemia and brain herniation. Time spent above an ICP of 20 mmHg often predicts a greater risk of death and disability following ICH. Compensatory mechanisms combat rising ICP. Classically, these include cerebrospinal fluid volume loss and cerebrovascular autoregulation, such as a reduction in the volume of venous blood. Additional mechanisms such as brain tissue compliance and skull volume compensation may also contribute. Compensatory compliance mechanisms are limited, and they vary by age and many other factors. Animal models of ICH are widely used to assess these variables and to gauge putative therapeutics. Most often those studies rely upon simple measures of edema, which may not accurately predict ICP data. Thus, we analyzed our past studies characterizing ICP, edema, and tissue compliance responses to striatal ICH in rat, including the collagenase (C-ICH) and whole blood models (WB-ICH). We found that both ICH models raised ICP, with greater effects in the C-ICH model, which may thus better reflect clinical findings of concern. Importantly, measures of edema, such as in the damaged hemisphere, on their own are not predictive of average or peak ICP response within either model, unless assessing across a very wide range of injury severities, or when including non-stroke animals. We caution against using edema data as a surrogate measure of mass effect and ICP following ICH.
大鼠脑出血后水肿与颅内压的关系
颅内压升高(ICP)是脑出血(ICH)的潜在致命后果。随着血肿团块和局部水肿的形成,颅内压升高,并在脑卒中后急剧变化。高颅内压可能通过损害局部组织灌注而加重细胞损伤和水肿,从而加剧一个循环,最终可能通过缺血和脑疝导致死亡。ICP高于20mmhg的时间通常预示着脑出血后死亡和残疾的风险更大。补偿机制对抗不断上升的ICP。典型的症状包括脑脊液容量减少和脑血管自身调节,如静脉血容量减少。其他机制,如脑组织顺应性和颅骨体积补偿也可能起作用。补偿性遵守机制是有限的,它们因年龄和许多其他因素而异。脑出血动物模型被广泛用于评估这些变量和衡量假定的治疗方法。大多数情况下,这些研究依赖于简单的水肿测量,这可能无法准确预测ICP数据。因此,我们分析了我们过去的研究,包括胶原酶(C-ICH)和全血模型(WB-ICH),描述了大鼠纹状体脑出血的ICP、水肿和组织顺应性反应。我们发现两种脑出血模型都提高了ICP, C-ICH模型的影响更大,因此可能更好地反映了我们关注的临床结果。重要的是,水肿的测量,如受损半球的水肿,本身并不能预测两种模型中的平均或峰值ICP反应,除非在非常广泛的损伤严重程度范围内进行评估,或者包括非中风动物。我们警告不要使用水肿数据作为ICH后质量效应和ICP的替代测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信