H. Ai, O. Mawlawi, R. Stafford, J. Bankson, Y. Shao, M. Guindani, R. Wendt
{"title":"An Investigation of the Required MR Bone Attenuation Correction for Quantitative Whole-Body PET/MR Imaging Using Clinical NaF PET/CT Studies","authors":"H. Ai, O. Mawlawi, R. Stafford, J. Bankson, Y. Shao, M. Guindani, R. Wendt","doi":"10.4236/IJMPCERO.2018.73023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tissue-classification-based \nattenuation correction strategies have been previously proposed to correct for \nbone attenuation in PET/MR imaging and simulated using computed tomography. \nHowever, the complication of voxel averaging uniquely associated with bone has \nnot been considered explicitly in the past. This study investigated the effect \nof voxel averaging between bone and soft tissue in attenuation images and \ndetermined how accurately bone must be detected in MR images in order to \nperform acceptable attenuation correction of PET data by using CT-simulated \nattenuation correction. We found out that treating bone as soft tissue caused a \nmean quantification difference of -9.9% ± 5.5% in all 119 bone lesions. There were no significant \ndifferences between lesions in the pelvis and the vertebrae. The nominal \ndifference in lesions in the ribs was significantly lower, likely due to the \nspatial misregistration between the emission and attenuation images. \nInterestingly, a non-monotonic relationship between the bone imaging ability \nand the absolute PET quantification accuracy was observed, with the minimal \nquantification difference achieved at a BVF around 40% for skull lesions (2.6% \n± 2.1%), and 30% for non-skull lesions (1.4% ± 1.1%) and all lesions (1.5% ± \n1.3%). This study established that a bone classification sensitivity of \napproximately 30% BVF is required in order for MR-based attenuation correction \nmethods to achieve optimal quantification in whole-body PET/MR studies. For \nthis purpose, higher bone imaging ability of MR may not be necessary.","PeriodicalId":14028,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology","volume":"13 1","pages":"273-295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/IJMPCERO.2018.73023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Tissue-classification-based
attenuation correction strategies have been previously proposed to correct for
bone attenuation in PET/MR imaging and simulated using computed tomography.
However, the complication of voxel averaging uniquely associated with bone has
not been considered explicitly in the past. This study investigated the effect
of voxel averaging between bone and soft tissue in attenuation images and
determined how accurately bone must be detected in MR images in order to
perform acceptable attenuation correction of PET data by using CT-simulated
attenuation correction. We found out that treating bone as soft tissue caused a
mean quantification difference of -9.9% ± 5.5% in all 119 bone lesions. There were no significant
differences between lesions in the pelvis and the vertebrae. The nominal
difference in lesions in the ribs was significantly lower, likely due to the
spatial misregistration between the emission and attenuation images.
Interestingly, a non-monotonic relationship between the bone imaging ability
and the absolute PET quantification accuracy was observed, with the minimal
quantification difference achieved at a BVF around 40% for skull lesions (2.6%
± 2.1%), and 30% for non-skull lesions (1.4% ± 1.1%) and all lesions (1.5% ±
1.3%). This study established that a bone classification sensitivity of
approximately 30% BVF is required in order for MR-based attenuation correction
methods to achieve optimal quantification in whole-body PET/MR studies. For
this purpose, higher bone imaging ability of MR may not be necessary.