Sprinkler flow rate affects physiological, behavioural and production responses of Holstein cows during heat stress

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
M. Bah, K. Javed, T. Pasha, M. Shahid
{"title":"Sprinkler flow rate affects physiological, behavioural and production responses of Holstein cows during heat stress","authors":"M. Bah, K. Javed, T. Pasha, M. Shahid","doi":"10.4314/SAJAS.V51I5.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Holstein Friesian cows are known for their high milk yield. They are popular in the commercial dairy  sector of Pakistan. Heat stress is a major challenge for these animals owing to the longer summer season with high ambient temperatures (35 - 40 °C) and relative humidity (30 - 50%) in the area (Butt et al., 2020). Mitigating the effects of heat stress requires substantial investments in energy and water. Spraying dairy  cows with water in the holding pen or at the feed bunk is common practice as it lowers  body  temperature and respiration rate (Kendall et al., 2007; Chen et al., 2013; 2016), and improves feed  intake  and milk yield (Keister et al., 2002). Owing to the recent decrease in global groundwater, studies have  focused on strategies to reduce the use of water to cool dairy cows (Chen et al., 2016). Sprinkler flow  rates  of 1.3 and 4.9 L/min had similar effects on physiological responses of cows to heat load but  produced a 73%  difference in water use (Chen et al., 2016). Similarly, Tresoldi et al. (2019) concluded that  a sprinkler flow rate of 4.9 L/min had poor efficiency compared with 3.3 L/min, as the additional water did not result in increased biologically relevant cooling. These studies were conducted in Mediterranean climates with an average temperature humidity index in the range of 76 to 78. A recent study with Nili Ravi buffaloes revealed a sprinkler flow rate 1.25 L/min was more efficient than one of 2.0 L/min during subtropical summers (Bah et al., 2021). Because water is projected to be scarce in Pakistan by 2030 (Mustafa et al., 2013), holistic strategies for water conservation in the dairy sector are important nationally. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of various sprinkler flow rates on the performance of lactating Holstein Friesian cows in a typical corporate dairy farm setting during the subtropical summer. Performance of these cows was assumed to be similar, irrespective of the sprinkler flow rates.","PeriodicalId":21869,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Animal Science","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/SAJAS.V51I5.2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Holstein Friesian cows are known for their high milk yield. They are popular in the commercial dairy  sector of Pakistan. Heat stress is a major challenge for these animals owing to the longer summer season with high ambient temperatures (35 - 40 °C) and relative humidity (30 - 50%) in the area (Butt et al., 2020). Mitigating the effects of heat stress requires substantial investments in energy and water. Spraying dairy  cows with water in the holding pen or at the feed bunk is common practice as it lowers  body  temperature and respiration rate (Kendall et al., 2007; Chen et al., 2013; 2016), and improves feed  intake  and milk yield (Keister et al., 2002). Owing to the recent decrease in global groundwater, studies have  focused on strategies to reduce the use of water to cool dairy cows (Chen et al., 2016). Sprinkler flow  rates  of 1.3 and 4.9 L/min had similar effects on physiological responses of cows to heat load but  produced a 73%  difference in water use (Chen et al., 2016). Similarly, Tresoldi et al. (2019) concluded that  a sprinkler flow rate of 4.9 L/min had poor efficiency compared with 3.3 L/min, as the additional water did not result in increased biologically relevant cooling. These studies were conducted in Mediterranean climates with an average temperature humidity index in the range of 76 to 78. A recent study with Nili Ravi buffaloes revealed a sprinkler flow rate 1.25 L/min was more efficient than one of 2.0 L/min during subtropical summers (Bah et al., 2021). Because water is projected to be scarce in Pakistan by 2030 (Mustafa et al., 2013), holistic strategies for water conservation in the dairy sector are important nationally. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of various sprinkler flow rates on the performance of lactating Holstein Friesian cows in a typical corporate dairy farm setting during the subtropical summer. Performance of these cows was assumed to be similar, irrespective of the sprinkler flow rates.
喷淋流量影响热应激下荷斯坦奶牛的生理、行为和生产反应
荷斯坦弗里西亚奶牛以其高产奶量而闻名。它们在巴基斯坦的商业乳制品部门很受欢迎。由于该地区夏季较长,环境温度高(35 - 40°C),相对湿度高(30 - 50%),因此热应激是这些动物面临的主要挑战(Butt et al., 2020)。减轻热应激的影响需要在能源和水方面进行大量投资。在饲养栏或饲料栏向奶牛喷水是常见的做法,因为它可以降低体温和呼吸速率(Kendall等人,2007;Chen et al., 2013;2016),并提高采食量和产奶量(Keister et al., 2002)。由于最近全球地下水减少,研究集中在减少奶牛降温用水的策略上(Chen et al., 2016)。1.3 L/min和4.9 L/min的喷头流量对奶牛对热负荷的生理反应有相似的影响,但在用水量上产生了73%的差异(Chen et al., 2016)。同样,Tresoldi等人(2019)得出结论,与3.3 L/min相比,4.9 L/min的喷头流量效率较低,因为额外的水不会导致生物相关冷却的增加。这些研究是在地中海气候中进行的,平均温度湿度指数在76到78之间。最近一项针对Nili Ravi水牛的研究表明,在亚热带夏季,1.25 L/min的喷头流量比2.0 L/min的喷头效率更高(Bah等,2021)。由于预计到2030年巴基斯坦将缺水(Mustafa et al., 2013),因此在全国范围内,乳制品行业的整体节水战略非常重要。本研究的目的是在亚热带夏季典型的企业奶牛场环境中评估不同喷头流量对泌乳荷斯坦弗里西亚奶牛生产性能的影响。假设这些奶牛的性能是相似的,而不考虑喷头的流量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
South African Journal of Animal Science
South African Journal of Animal Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Animal Science is an open access, peer-reviewed journal for publication of original scientific articles and reviews in the field of animal science. The journal publishes reports of research dealing with production of farmed animal species (cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, horses, poultry and ostriches), as well as pertinent aspects of research on aquatic and wildlife species. Disciplines covered nutrition, genetics, physiology, and production systems. Systematic research on animal products, behaviour, and welfare are also invited. Rigorous testing of well-specified hypotheses is expected.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信