Textbook Author Comments on Hillocks

J. Dawkins
{"title":"Textbook Author Comments on Hillocks","authors":"J. Dawkins","doi":"10.1086/443463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"larger system. We have stated that our purpose is to stimulate discussion. In conclusion we offer some additional questions to consider in reading the Berk and Berson response. 1. Is the \"extension of public schooling downward to include the very early childhood years\" the same as having good child-care services for young children? How will the public schools accommodate to the other-than-educational aspects of early childhood programs? 2. If Head Start and day care are not acceptable as they exist, then why project program costs based on their budgets? What would the cost of a day-care program under public school auspices be? 3. Is proximity to children a valid criterion for determining whether schools would provide a variety of supportive services? 4. How will schools that have for generations excluded parents from participation in educational program planning reverse that trend?","PeriodicalId":83260,"journal":{"name":"The School science review","volume":"16 1","pages":"124 - 126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The School science review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/443463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

larger system. We have stated that our purpose is to stimulate discussion. In conclusion we offer some additional questions to consider in reading the Berk and Berson response. 1. Is the "extension of public schooling downward to include the very early childhood years" the same as having good child-care services for young children? How will the public schools accommodate to the other-than-educational aspects of early childhood programs? 2. If Head Start and day care are not acceptable as they exist, then why project program costs based on their budgets? What would the cost of a day-care program under public school auspices be? 3. Is proximity to children a valid criterion for determining whether schools would provide a variety of supportive services? 4. How will schools that have for generations excluded parents from participation in educational program planning reverse that trend?
教科书作者对山丘的评论
更大的系统。我们已经说过,我们的目的是促进讨论。最后,我们提供了一些额外的问题,以考虑在阅读伯克和伯森的回应。1. “将公立学校教育向下延伸至幼儿时期”是否等同于为幼儿提供良好的托儿服务?公立学校将如何适应儿童早期项目的教育以外的方面?2. 如果“启智计划”和“日托中心”的存在是不可接受的,那么为什么要根据它们的预算来制定项目费用呢?在公立学校的赞助下,日托项目的费用是多少?3.学校是否会提供各种支援服务,邻近学童是否为一项有效标准?4. 几代人以来一直将家长排除在教育项目规划之外的学校如何扭转这一趋势?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书