The analysis of approaches to conducting bioequivalence studies and the policy of “transparency” of their results in Ukraine, the United States and the European Union

О. Popov, І.V. Kravchenko, V.Ye. Dоbrоvа, K. Tkachenko
{"title":"The analysis of approaches to conducting bioequivalence studies and the policy of “transparency” of their results in Ukraine, the United States and the European Union","authors":"О. Popov, І.V. Kravchenko, V.Ye. Dоbrоvа, K. Tkachenko","doi":"10.24959/cphj.21.1548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Providing the population of Ukraine with quality, effective and, at the same time, economically affordable medicines is a priority task of the healthcare system. Taking into account the relatively low cost of their development generic drugs are available to the majority of the country’s population; thus, bioequivalence studies are needed to obtain data on their efficacy and safety. Ukraine is currently in the process of harmonizing domestic regulatory requirements for generic drugs and conducting bioequivalence studies with global ones. Therefore, it is important to find out the differences in approaches to the registration of generics and studies of their bioequivalence in Ukraine and other countries. Another important aspect is to provide the policy of “transparency” of bioequivalence research results, which contributes to the use of better drugs.\nAim. To analyze domestic and global approaches to the organization of the bioequivalence research and provide the policy of “transparency” of their results.\nMaterials and methods. A comparative analysis of approaches to drug registration, requirements for generic drugs and bioequivalence studies and ways to provide the policy of “transparency” of their results in Ukraine, the United States and the European Union was conducted.\nResults. The analysis has revealed that the methods of registration of drugs in Ukraine, the United States and the EU are the same. Approaches to providing the “transparency” of the results of bioequivalence studies differ since in Ukraine the publication of such information is not mandatory and is at the discretion of pharmaceutical manufacturers.\nConclusions. Domestic regulatory requirements for assessing generic drugs are harmonized with the world ones. Today, there is a need to introduce a mandatory requirement for the publication of bioequivalence studies, and it will contribute to providing an effective “transparency” policy.","PeriodicalId":10498,"journal":{"name":"Clinical pharmacy","volume":"102 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24959/cphj.21.1548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Providing the population of Ukraine with quality, effective and, at the same time, economically affordable medicines is a priority task of the healthcare system. Taking into account the relatively low cost of their development generic drugs are available to the majority of the country’s population; thus, bioequivalence studies are needed to obtain data on their efficacy and safety. Ukraine is currently in the process of harmonizing domestic regulatory requirements for generic drugs and conducting bioequivalence studies with global ones. Therefore, it is important to find out the differences in approaches to the registration of generics and studies of their bioequivalence in Ukraine and other countries. Another important aspect is to provide the policy of “transparency” of bioequivalence research results, which contributes to the use of better drugs. Aim. To analyze domestic and global approaches to the organization of the bioequivalence research and provide the policy of “transparency” of their results. Materials and methods. A comparative analysis of approaches to drug registration, requirements for generic drugs and bioequivalence studies and ways to provide the policy of “transparency” of their results in Ukraine, the United States and the European Union was conducted. Results. The analysis has revealed that the methods of registration of drugs in Ukraine, the United States and the EU are the same. Approaches to providing the “transparency” of the results of bioequivalence studies differ since in Ukraine the publication of such information is not mandatory and is at the discretion of pharmaceutical manufacturers. Conclusions. Domestic regulatory requirements for assessing generic drugs are harmonized with the world ones. Today, there is a need to introduce a mandatory requirement for the publication of bioequivalence studies, and it will contribute to providing an effective “transparency” policy.
对乌克兰、美国和欧盟开展生物等效性研究的方法和结果“透明”政策的分析
为乌克兰人民提供优质、有效、同时经济上负担得起的药品是卫生保健系统的一项优先任务。考虑到仿制药的开发成本相对较低,该国大多数人口都可以获得仿制药;因此,需要进行生物等效性研究以获得其有效性和安全性的数据。乌克兰目前正在协调国内对非专利药品的管制要求,并与全球进行生物等效性研究。因此,找出乌克兰和其他国家仿制药注册方法和生物等效性研究的差异是很重要的。另一个重要方面是提供生物等效性研究结果的“透明度”政策,这有助于更好地使用药物。分析国内外组织生物等效性研究的方法,并提出其结果“透明”的政策。材料和方法。对乌克兰、美国和欧盟的药品注册方法、仿制药要求和生物等效性研究以及提供其结果“透明度”政策的方法进行了比较分析。分析显示,乌克兰、美国和欧盟的药品注册方法是相同的。提供生物等效性研究结果“透明度”的方法不同,因为在乌克兰,此类信息的发布不是强制性的,而是由制药商自行决定的。国内仿制药评估的监管要求与世界接轨。今天,有必要引入对生物等效性研究发表的强制性要求,这将有助于提供有效的“透明度”政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信