Bacteriological quality of community well water and public health concerns in Enugu urban, Nigeria

L. Obikpo, F. C. Onyia, I. M. Offe, C.M Ezeilo, C. Ezebialu, R. A. Afunwa
{"title":"Bacteriological quality of community well water and public health concerns in Enugu urban, Nigeria","authors":"L. Obikpo, F. C. Onyia, I. M. Offe, C.M Ezeilo, C. Ezebialu, R. A. Afunwa","doi":"10.4314/ajcem.v23i2.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Water is a basic necessity used by humans for both domestic and industrial uses. Next to air, water is essential to life. It takes up about 71% of the earth’s surface. The objective of this study is to determine the bacteriological quality of well water in Enugu urban, Nigeria \nMethodology: A total of 60 domestic wells were selected from Abakpa, Obiagu and Achara layouts in Engu urban, Nigeria by stratified random sampling method, with 20 wells selected from each area based on location of well sites and construction parameters. Water samples were collected from each well using a sterile 200ml plastic bottle for bacteriological analysis to estimate total bacteria count in colony forming unit (cfu)/ml, total coliform count in most probable number (mpn)/100ml, and faecal coliform count in most probable number (mpn)/100ml. Bacterial isolates were identified using Gram reaction and conventional biochemical tests including catalase and coagulase for Gram positive bacteria, and oxidase, citrate utilization, hydrogen sulfide, indole, urease, methyl red, Voges Proskauer, and sugar fermentation tests for Gram negative bacteria. Antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) of each isolate was performed by the disk diffusion method against selected antibiotics including penicillin G (10µg), ciprofloxacin (5µg), streptomycin (10µg), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (20/10µg), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (25µg), and result interpreted using the European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) break points. Comparative statistics of the data was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. \nResults: The well water in the three layouts were heavily contaminated as shown by comparatively high mean total bacteria counts of 0.8825±0.66x104 cfu/ml, 0.8435±0.6413x104 cfu/ml, and 0.8384±0.5948x104 cfu/ml for Abakpa, Obiagu and Achara layouts respectively (p=0.9714). The mean total coliform counts were 5.15±5.284, 5.45±4.31 and 5.05±4.763 mpn/100ml (p=0.8038), and the mean faecal coliform counts were 2.4±3.393, 2.65±2.796 and 2.05±2.35 mpn/100ml (p=0.9631) for Abakpa, Obiagu and Achara layouts respectively. A total of 50 pathogenic bacterial isolates were identified; Klebsiella pneumoniae 21 (43.8%), Escherichia coli 13 (30.0%), Proteus spp 6 (12.5%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa 6 (12.5%), and Staphylococcus aureus 2 (4.2%). The AST result shows that 75% of K. pneumoniae, E. coli, Proteus spp and S. aureus were resistant to all five antibiotics tested. \nConclusion: These findings showed high faecal contamination of domestic well water sources, which poses a significant infection risk to the community. Proper water treatment measures and personal hygiene practices are recommended, and well sites should be located at a safe distance from septic tanks, pit latrines, flowing gutters and refuse dump sites.","PeriodicalId":7415,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Clinical and Experimental Microbiology","volume":"13 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Clinical and Experimental Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ajcem.v23i2.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Water is a basic necessity used by humans for both domestic and industrial uses. Next to air, water is essential to life. It takes up about 71% of the earth’s surface. The objective of this study is to determine the bacteriological quality of well water in Enugu urban, Nigeria Methodology: A total of 60 domestic wells were selected from Abakpa, Obiagu and Achara layouts in Engu urban, Nigeria by stratified random sampling method, with 20 wells selected from each area based on location of well sites and construction parameters. Water samples were collected from each well using a sterile 200ml plastic bottle for bacteriological analysis to estimate total bacteria count in colony forming unit (cfu)/ml, total coliform count in most probable number (mpn)/100ml, and faecal coliform count in most probable number (mpn)/100ml. Bacterial isolates were identified using Gram reaction and conventional biochemical tests including catalase and coagulase for Gram positive bacteria, and oxidase, citrate utilization, hydrogen sulfide, indole, urease, methyl red, Voges Proskauer, and sugar fermentation tests for Gram negative bacteria. Antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) of each isolate was performed by the disk diffusion method against selected antibiotics including penicillin G (10µg), ciprofloxacin (5µg), streptomycin (10µg), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (20/10µg), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (25µg), and result interpreted using the European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) break points. Comparative statistics of the data was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The well water in the three layouts were heavily contaminated as shown by comparatively high mean total bacteria counts of 0.8825±0.66x104 cfu/ml, 0.8435±0.6413x104 cfu/ml, and 0.8384±0.5948x104 cfu/ml for Abakpa, Obiagu and Achara layouts respectively (p=0.9714). The mean total coliform counts were 5.15±5.284, 5.45±4.31 and 5.05±4.763 mpn/100ml (p=0.8038), and the mean faecal coliform counts were 2.4±3.393, 2.65±2.796 and 2.05±2.35 mpn/100ml (p=0.9631) for Abakpa, Obiagu and Achara layouts respectively. A total of 50 pathogenic bacterial isolates were identified; Klebsiella pneumoniae 21 (43.8%), Escherichia coli 13 (30.0%), Proteus spp 6 (12.5%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa 6 (12.5%), and Staphylococcus aureus 2 (4.2%). The AST result shows that 75% of K. pneumoniae, E. coli, Proteus spp and S. aureus were resistant to all five antibiotics tested. Conclusion: These findings showed high faecal contamination of domestic well water sources, which poses a significant infection risk to the community. Proper water treatment measures and personal hygiene practices are recommended, and well sites should be located at a safe distance from septic tanks, pit latrines, flowing gutters and refuse dump sites.
尼日利亚埃努古市社区井水的细菌质量和公共卫生问题
背景:水是人类生活和工业使用的基本必需品。除了空气之外,水对生命也是必不可少的。它约占地球表面的71%。方法:采用分层随机抽样的方法,从尼日利亚恩古市Abakpa、Obiagu和Achara三种布局中选取60口家庭水井,根据井位和施工参数从每个区域选取20口水井。用200ml无菌塑料瓶采集每口井的水样进行细菌学分析,估计菌落形成单位(cfu)/ml总细菌数、最大可能数(mpn)/100ml总大肠菌群数和最大可能数(mpn)/100ml粪便大肠菌群数。采用革兰氏反应和常规生化试验,包括革兰氏阳性菌的过氧化氢酶和凝固酶,革兰氏阴性菌的氧化酶、柠檬酸利用、硫化氢、吲哚、脲酶、甲基红、Voges Proskauer和糖发酵试验,鉴定分离细菌。采用盘片扩散法对青霉素G(10µG)、环丙沙星(5µG)、链霉素(10µG)、阿莫西林-克拉维酸(20/10µG)、甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(25µG)等选定的抗生素进行药敏试验(AST),结果采用欧洲抗菌药物敏感性试验委员会(EUCAST)断点进行解释。采用方差分析(ANOVA)对数据进行比较统计,p<0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:Abakpa、Obiagu和Achara三个布局的井水平均细菌总数分别为0.8825±0.66 × 104 cfu/ml、0.8435±0.6413 × 104 cfu/ml和0.8384±0.5948 × 104 cfu/ml,污染程度较高(p=0.9714)。Abakpa、Obiagu和Achara布局的粪便大肠菌群总数分别为5.15±5.284、5.45±4.31和5.05±4.763 mpn/100ml (p=0.8038),粪便大肠菌群总数分别为2.4±3.393、2.65±2.796和2.05±2.35 mpn/100ml (p=0.9631)。共分离出50株致病菌;肺炎克雷伯菌21(43.8%)、大肠埃希菌13(30.0%)、变形杆菌6(12.5%)、铜绿假单胞菌6(12.5%)、金黄色葡萄球菌2(4.2%)。AST结果显示,75%的肺炎克雷伯菌、大肠杆菌、变形杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌对所有5种抗生素均有耐药性。结论:生活井水水源粪便污染程度较高,具有较高的社区感染风险。建议采取适当的水处理措施和个人卫生习惯,井址应位于与化粪池、坑式厕所、流动排水沟和垃圾倾倒场保持安全距离的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信