Approaches to Occupational Rehabilitation and Return to Work in Four Jurisdictions: A Cross-National Analysis From the Perspective of the ISSA Guidelines on Return to Work and Reintegration

Q1 Social Sciences
D. Mcananey, R. Wynne
{"title":"Approaches to Occupational Rehabilitation and Return to Work in Four Jurisdictions: A Cross-National Analysis From the Perspective of the ISSA Guidelines on Return to Work and Reintegration","authors":"D. Mcananey, R. Wynne","doi":"10.1017/idm.2017.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The guidelines published by the International Social Security Association, ISSA Guidelines: Return to Work and Reintegration, provide a policy imperative towards early intervention for people with nonoccupational health conditions at risk of exiting the workforce and moving to disability dependency. Socioeconomic and fiscal imperatives have been demonstrated by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's (OECD) review on sickness, disability and work (OECD, 2010), and by an accumulating evidence base for effectiveness. This study explored how social protection agencies are responding in terms of employment rehabilitation services for employed people with acquired disabilities. Specifically, this study reviewed job retention and return processes for workers with nonoccupational health conditions from the perspective of the ISSA guidelines in four jurisdictions with differing system frameworks. The methods used included a review of relevant literature and web resources and gathering detailed system descriptions from national respondents. Although the jurisdictions differed in the concepts used, service context, the structure of welfare systems and eligibility criteria, there was evidence of an acknowledgement of the needs of employed people with disabilities. This was not, however, consistently reflected in procedures, processes or outcome measurements. While some promising characteristics were identified, there was substantial room for improvement in the job retention and return to work strategies of the relevant agencies in all four jurisdictions. It was concluded that the deployment of the ISSA Guidelines: Return to Work and Reintegration, published in 2013, had yet to make a substantial impact on services and approaches in the domain of nonoccupational health conditions in these jurisdictions.","PeriodicalId":53532,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Disability Management","volume":"44-46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Disability Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/idm.2017.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The guidelines published by the International Social Security Association, ISSA Guidelines: Return to Work and Reintegration, provide a policy imperative towards early intervention for people with nonoccupational health conditions at risk of exiting the workforce and moving to disability dependency. Socioeconomic and fiscal imperatives have been demonstrated by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's (OECD) review on sickness, disability and work (OECD, 2010), and by an accumulating evidence base for effectiveness. This study explored how social protection agencies are responding in terms of employment rehabilitation services for employed people with acquired disabilities. Specifically, this study reviewed job retention and return processes for workers with nonoccupational health conditions from the perspective of the ISSA guidelines in four jurisdictions with differing system frameworks. The methods used included a review of relevant literature and web resources and gathering detailed system descriptions from national respondents. Although the jurisdictions differed in the concepts used, service context, the structure of welfare systems and eligibility criteria, there was evidence of an acknowledgement of the needs of employed people with disabilities. This was not, however, consistently reflected in procedures, processes or outcome measurements. While some promising characteristics were identified, there was substantial room for improvement in the job retention and return to work strategies of the relevant agencies in all four jurisdictions. It was concluded that the deployment of the ISSA Guidelines: Return to Work and Reintegration, published in 2013, had yet to make a substantial impact on services and approaches in the domain of nonoccupational health conditions in these jurisdictions.
四个司法管辖区的职业康复和重返工作:从ISSA重返工作和重返社会指南的角度进行跨国分析
国际社会保障协会发布的准则《重返工作岗位和重返社会指南》规定了一项必要的政策,要求对有非职业健康状况的人进行早期干预,使其有可能退出劳动力队伍并转向残疾依赖。经济合作与发展组织(OECD)对疾病、残疾和工作的审查(OECD, 2010)以及越来越多的有效性证据基础,证明了社会经济和财政方面的必要性。本研究探讨社会保障机构在就业康复服务方面如何回应获得性残疾就业人士。具体地说,本研究从具有不同制度框架的四个司法管辖区的ISSA指南的角度回顾了具有非职业健康状况的工人的工作保留和返回过程。使用的方法包括回顾相关文献和网络资源,并从全国受访者那里收集详细的系统描述。虽然司法管辖区在使用的概念、服务范围、福利制度的结构和资格标准方面有所不同,但有证据表明承认残疾就业人员的需要。然而,这并没有一贯地反映在程序、过程或结果测量中。虽然确定了一些有希望的特点,但在所有四个司法管辖区的有关机构的保留工作和重返工作战略方面仍有很大的改进余地。结论是,2013年出版的《重返工作和重返社会》准则的实施尚未对这些司法管辖区非职业卫生条件领域的服务和办法产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Disability Management
International Journal of Disability Management Social Sciences-Health (social science)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信