Exploring a state college’s dialogic strategies and public engagement on Facebook

IF 0.1 Q4 COMMUNICATION
Plaridel Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.52518/2022-05slvnflr
D. Silvallana
{"title":"Exploring a state college’s dialogic strategies and public engagement on Facebook","authors":"D. Silvallana","doi":"10.52518/2022-05slvnflr","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technological advances influence the way organizations communicate and build relations with the public. Previous studies have explored digital dialogic communication in different organizational contexts; however, there is a paucity of studies that focus on dialogic communication in public institutions. This current study extends the investigation of online relationship building by exploring how a state college uses Facebook to facilitate dialogic communication with stakeholders. Through quantitative content analysis and key informant interviews, a complete enumeration of Facebook posts from January to December 2020 examined the use of dialogic features within the Facebook profile as well as in-depth interviews with the directors, office heads, and stakeholders. Results showed that the state college used a variety of dialogic internet principles on Facebook. Yet, one-way strategies were still more commonly used. The principle of conservation of visitors and organizational engagement for creating an online dialogue enhances public engagement outcomes of users’ reactions, likes, shares, and comments. Moreover, findings from qualitative data demonstrate that a state college relied on social media more to disseminate information rather than a dialogic and interactive medium for governance.","PeriodicalId":40520,"journal":{"name":"Plaridel","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plaridel","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52518/2022-05slvnflr","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Technological advances influence the way organizations communicate and build relations with the public. Previous studies have explored digital dialogic communication in different organizational contexts; however, there is a paucity of studies that focus on dialogic communication in public institutions. This current study extends the investigation of online relationship building by exploring how a state college uses Facebook to facilitate dialogic communication with stakeholders. Through quantitative content analysis and key informant interviews, a complete enumeration of Facebook posts from January to December 2020 examined the use of dialogic features within the Facebook profile as well as in-depth interviews with the directors, office heads, and stakeholders. Results showed that the state college used a variety of dialogic internet principles on Facebook. Yet, one-way strategies were still more commonly used. The principle of conservation of visitors and organizational engagement for creating an online dialogue enhances public engagement outcomes of users’ reactions, likes, shares, and comments. Moreover, findings from qualitative data demonstrate that a state college relied on social media more to disseminate information rather than a dialogic and interactive medium for governance.
探索一所州立大学在Facebook上的对话策略和公众参与
技术进步影响着组织与公众沟通和建立关系的方式。以往的研究探讨了不同组织背景下的数字对话沟通;然而,对公共机构对话交际的研究却很少。本研究通过探索州立大学如何使用Facebook促进与利益相关者的对话沟通,扩展了在线关系建立的调查。通过定量内容分析和关键线人访谈,对2020年1月至12月的Facebook帖子进行了全面列举,检查了Facebook个人资料中对话功能的使用情况,并对董事、办公室负责人和利益相关者进行了深入访谈。结果显示,这所州立大学在Facebook上使用了多种对话式互联网原则。然而,单向策略仍然更常用。保护访问者和组织参与创建在线对话的原则增强了用户反应、喜欢、分享和评论的公共参与结果。此外,定性数据的研究结果表明,州立大学更多地依赖社交媒体来传播信息,而不是作为对话和互动的治理媒介。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plaridel
Plaridel COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
66.70%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信