Amikacin as the Most Potent Antibiotic Locally, is it Required Prior to Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) in Patients with Double J Stents?

M. Rafie, Ziad Alnaib, Zeyad Aljuboori, Elsawi Osman
{"title":"Amikacin as the Most Potent Antibiotic Locally, is it Required Prior to Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) in Patients with Double J Stents?","authors":"M. Rafie, Ziad Alnaib, Zeyad Aljuboori, Elsawi Osman","doi":"10.35248/2168-9857.19.8.215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess the efficacy of Amikacin as the anti-biotic of least recorded resistance locally in preventing urinary infective episodes following ESWL (Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy) in patients with DJ stents in-situ. Materials and methods: A retrospective review of a cohort of 60 adult patients with upper urinary tract calculi and DJ stent in-situ, who received one dose of Amikacin intravenously immediately before ESWL was carried out. All patients had a documented negative urine culture prior to ESWL. The incidence rate of post ESWL bacteriuria was calculated and compared to the published incidence rates of bacteruria patients who did not receive any prophylaxis. Results: A total number of 60 adult patients with DJ stent in-situ, who received Amikacin prophylaxis, underwent ESWL between the 1st of January 2017 and the 31st of December 2017. All of the 60 patients had a documented negative urine culture pre-ESL. Two patients were found to have positive urine culture post ESWL with an incidence rate of 3.33. This was not statistically different to the published percentage of patients who received no prophylaxis in the compared studies that showed incidence rates of 3.08 and 2.17 respectively (Chi-square=0.704, p=0.703). Conclusion: Intravenous Amikacin prophylaxis was not efficacious in reducing UTI and urinary sepsis following ESWL in patients with DJ stents in-situ, despite being the antibiotic of least resistance locally.","PeriodicalId":89536,"journal":{"name":"British journal of medical & surgical urology","volume":"115 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of medical & surgical urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2168-9857.19.8.215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy of Amikacin as the anti-biotic of least recorded resistance locally in preventing urinary infective episodes following ESWL (Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy) in patients with DJ stents in-situ. Materials and methods: A retrospective review of a cohort of 60 adult patients with upper urinary tract calculi and DJ stent in-situ, who received one dose of Amikacin intravenously immediately before ESWL was carried out. All patients had a documented negative urine culture prior to ESWL. The incidence rate of post ESWL bacteriuria was calculated and compared to the published incidence rates of bacteruria patients who did not receive any prophylaxis. Results: A total number of 60 adult patients with DJ stent in-situ, who received Amikacin prophylaxis, underwent ESWL between the 1st of January 2017 and the 31st of December 2017. All of the 60 patients had a documented negative urine culture pre-ESL. Two patients were found to have positive urine culture post ESWL with an incidence rate of 3.33. This was not statistically different to the published percentage of patients who received no prophylaxis in the compared studies that showed incidence rates of 3.08 and 2.17 respectively (Chi-square=0.704, p=0.703). Conclusion: Intravenous Amikacin prophylaxis was not efficacious in reducing UTI and urinary sepsis following ESWL in patients with DJ stents in-situ, despite being the antibiotic of least resistance locally.
阿米卡星作为局部最有效的抗生素,是否需要在双J型支架患者体外冲击波碎石(ESWL)前使用?
目的:评价阿米卡星作为局部耐药最少的抗生素预防原位植入DJ支架患者ESWL(体外冲击波碎石术)后尿路感染发作的疗效。材料与方法:回顾性分析60例原位DJ支架成人上尿路结石患者,在行体外冲击波碎石术前立即静脉给予阿米卡星1剂。所有患者在ESWL前均有尿培养阴性记录。计算ESWL后细菌尿的发生率,并与未接受任何预防措施的细菌尿患者的发生率进行比较。结果:2017年1月1日至2017年12月31日,共60例接受阿米卡星预防治疗的原位DJ支架成年患者行ESWL。所有60例患者在esl前尿培养均为阴性。2例患者ESWL后尿培养阳性,发生率为3.33。这与已发表的未接受预防治疗的患者比例比较无统计学差异,发病率分别为3.08和2.17(卡方=0.704,p=0.703)。结论:静脉滴注阿米卡星预防对原位DJ支架患者ESWL后尿路感染和尿脓毒症的减少效果不明显,尽管它是局部耐药最少的抗生素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信