قضية خلق القرآن عند الجبرية والمعتزلة وأهل السنة

Amir Sahidin, Abdul Rohman
{"title":"قضية خلق القرآن عند الجبرية والمعتزلة وأهل السنة","authors":"Amir Sahidin, Abdul Rohman","doi":"10.24239/rsy.v17i2.766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The discussion of khalqul qur'an is a very crucial issue among the Mutakallimin. The Jabariyyah and Mu'tazilah groups say that the Qur'an is a creature in order to purify Allah from human-like characteristics. In fact, saying khalqul qur'an (the Qur'an is a creature) is the same as negating the nature of God, in the form of kalam. Belief like this will lead to three imperatives: first, as if God as the essence of the nature is a creature. Second, Allah is a mute Rabb, while being mute is a deficiency trait. Third, Allah's knowledge is a creature, because the Qur'an is His knowledge, then how could Allah have created knowledge first in order to have knowledge. Therefore the scholars of the Ahli Sunnah are unanimously agreed that the Qur'an is kalamullah. Among the scholars of the Ahli Sunnah who are very firm in defending the beliefs of the Sunnah are Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal. He not only gave strong arguments, but also refuted the group that said khalqul qur'an with a solid rebuttal. Based on a qualitative method and a comparative critical approach, it was found that, first, Jabariyyah and Mu'tazilah agreed that the Qur'an was a creature. Second, the Sunnah experts in general and Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal in particular insist that the Qur'an is the kalamullah. Third, when their arguments are found, the strongest is the opinion of the Ahli Sunnah. The basis for this difference of opinion is based on their beliefs about the nature of Allah.","PeriodicalId":31634,"journal":{"name":"Fikrah Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah dan Studi Keagamaan","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fikrah Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah dan Studi Keagamaan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24239/rsy.v17i2.766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The discussion of khalqul qur'an is a very crucial issue among the Mutakallimin. The Jabariyyah and Mu'tazilah groups say that the Qur'an is a creature in order to purify Allah from human-like characteristics. In fact, saying khalqul qur'an (the Qur'an is a creature) is the same as negating the nature of God, in the form of kalam. Belief like this will lead to three imperatives: first, as if God as the essence of the nature is a creature. Second, Allah is a mute Rabb, while being mute is a deficiency trait. Third, Allah's knowledge is a creature, because the Qur'an is His knowledge, then how could Allah have created knowledge first in order to have knowledge. Therefore the scholars of the Ahli Sunnah are unanimously agreed that the Qur'an is kalamullah. Among the scholars of the Ahli Sunnah who are very firm in defending the beliefs of the Sunnah are Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal. He not only gave strong arguments, but also refuted the group that said khalqul qur'an with a solid rebuttal. Based on a qualitative method and a comparative critical approach, it was found that, first, Jabariyyah and Mu'tazilah agreed that the Qur'an was a creature. Second, the Sunnah experts in general and Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal in particular insist that the Qur'an is the kalamullah. Third, when their arguments are found, the strongest is the opinion of the Ahli Sunnah. The basis for this difference of opinion is based on their beliefs about the nature of Allah.
《古兰经》遭软禁、隔离和先知的事件
对《古兰经》的讨论是穆塔卡利民之间的一个非常关键的问题。Jabariyyah和Mu'tazilah团体说,古兰经是一种生物,为了净化安拉的人类特征。事实上,说“khalqul quan”(《古兰经》是受造物)就等于以“kalam”的形式否定了真主的本性。这样的信仰会导致三个必然:第一,仿佛上帝作为自然界的本质是一种生物。其次,安拉是一个哑巴,而哑巴是一种缺陷特征。第三,安拉的知识是受造物,因为古兰经是他的知识,那么安拉怎么会为了拥有知识而先创造知识呢?因此,阿赫利圣训的学者们一致认为古兰经是卡拉穆拉。在阿赫利圣训的学者中,非常坚定地捍卫圣训信仰的是伊玛目艾哈迈德·本·汉巴尔。他不仅给出了强有力的论据,而且还以有力的反驳反驳了说“khalqul古兰经”的团体。基于定性的方法和比较批判的方法,我们发现,首先,Jabariyyah和Mu'tazilah同意《古兰经》是一种生物。第二,一般的圣训专家,尤其是伊玛目艾哈迈德·本·汉巴尔坚持认为古兰经是卡拉穆拉。第三,当他们的论点被发现时,最有力的是阿利圣训的观点。这种意见分歧的基础是基于他们对安拉本性的信仰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书