Compliance with animal welfare regulations: drivers and consequences.

Q1 Veterinary
C. Berg, F. Hedman
{"title":"Compliance with animal welfare regulations: drivers and consequences.","authors":"C. Berg, F. Hedman","doi":"10.1079/pavsnnr202015025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\n In the field of animal welfare science, the main focus has traditionally been on the risk factors for, and prevention of, animal welfare problems. More recently, the topic of measuring animal welfare at the individual level or at the group level has attracted substantial attention among animal welfare scientists. Furthermore, research into the content and structure of various regulations-including both official legislation and private standards-and their effects on animal welfare outcomes is growing. However, the amount of research related to compliance with animal welfare regulations is still extremely limited. In this review, we aim at illuminating the concept of compliance, how it can be measured within different audit systems, and the scientific challenges encountered when comparing different regulations in terms of compliance. In addition, we analyse and discuss different drivers for compliance, as well as the obstacles and complications in relation to various inspection and follow-up approaches in cases of non-compliance. We conclude that if participation in voluntary private animal welfare schemes is to be used as one of the variables when applying a risk-based approach to official animal welfare control, then the methods of measuring and accounting for compliance within such schemes must be clearly reported.","PeriodicalId":39273,"journal":{"name":"CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1079/pavsnnr202015025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract In the field of animal welfare science, the main focus has traditionally been on the risk factors for, and prevention of, animal welfare problems. More recently, the topic of measuring animal welfare at the individual level or at the group level has attracted substantial attention among animal welfare scientists. Furthermore, research into the content and structure of various regulations-including both official legislation and private standards-and their effects on animal welfare outcomes is growing. However, the amount of research related to compliance with animal welfare regulations is still extremely limited. In this review, we aim at illuminating the concept of compliance, how it can be measured within different audit systems, and the scientific challenges encountered when comparing different regulations in terms of compliance. In addition, we analyse and discuss different drivers for compliance, as well as the obstacles and complications in relation to various inspection and follow-up approaches in cases of non-compliance. We conclude that if participation in voluntary private animal welfare schemes is to be used as one of the variables when applying a risk-based approach to official animal welfare control, then the methods of measuring and accounting for compliance within such schemes must be clearly reported.
遵守动物福利法规:驱动因素和后果。
在动物福利科学领域,传统上主要关注的是动物福利问题的危险因素和预防。最近,在个体水平或群体水平上衡量动物福利的话题引起了动物福利科学家的极大关注。此外,对各种法规(包括官方立法和私人标准)的内容和结构以及它们对动物福利结果的影响的研究正在增加。然而,与遵守动物福利法规有关的研究数量仍然非常有限。在这篇综述中,我们旨在阐明合规性的概念,如何在不同的审计系统中衡量它,以及在比较不同法规的合规性时遇到的科学挑战。此外,我们还分析和讨论了合规的不同驱动因素,以及在不合规情况下与各种检查和后续方法相关的障碍和并发症。我们的结论是,如果在将基于风险的方法应用于官方动物福利控制时,将自愿私人动物福利计划的参与作为变量之一,那么必须明确报告此类计划中测量和核算合规的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources
CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信