Inhibitors and facilitators of corporate real estate dynamic alignment

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
H. Cooke, R. Appel-Meulenbroek, T. Arentze
{"title":"Inhibitors and facilitators of corporate real estate dynamic alignment","authors":"H. Cooke, R. Appel-Meulenbroek, T. Arentze","doi":"10.1108/JERER-08-2020-0048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to identify the importance of individual variables in the corporate real estate (CRE) decision-making process.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nNine experts received a posed scenario of a changed business strategy requiring a CRE reduction in individual interviews. Based on their suggested response, a decision network was modelled for each expert using the causal network elicitation technique, incorporating the utilities for decision variables and importance weights for attributes and benefits. The decision model offers a graphical representation of decision-benefit links for the decisions CRE managers make in such a period of decline.\n\n\nFindings\nPerceived facilitators of CRE dynamic alignment were identified by calculating lift ratios on their perceived importance of the attributes they mentioned during the interviews as nodes in the network that link decisions to benefits. Facilitators included CRE metrics and workplace strategy, while capital expenditure and landlords inhibit alignment processes. The research provides more granular insight into the variables used in CRE decision-making and the factors that facilitate or inhibit the dynamic alignment process.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe research set a specific scenario for the experts to consider. That could be regarded as small but there was clear evidence of saturation of expert knowledge. Additional face-to-face interviews with the experts may have generated further details on the thought processes of the experts.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe research provides more granular insight into the variables used in CRE decision-making and the factors that facilitate or inhibit the dynamic alignment process. Thereby providing CRE decision-makers with key elements for a decision model.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe research technique, causal network elicitation technique, uses semi-structured interviews to create decision networks, which is a technique that has not been widely applied to CRE research. The research provides a granular view of what are important inhibitors or facilitators of dynamic alignment of CRE to business strategy.\n","PeriodicalId":44570,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Real Estate Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Real Estate Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JERER-08-2020-0048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to identify the importance of individual variables in the corporate real estate (CRE) decision-making process. Design/methodology/approach Nine experts received a posed scenario of a changed business strategy requiring a CRE reduction in individual interviews. Based on their suggested response, a decision network was modelled for each expert using the causal network elicitation technique, incorporating the utilities for decision variables and importance weights for attributes and benefits. The decision model offers a graphical representation of decision-benefit links for the decisions CRE managers make in such a period of decline. Findings Perceived facilitators of CRE dynamic alignment were identified by calculating lift ratios on their perceived importance of the attributes they mentioned during the interviews as nodes in the network that link decisions to benefits. Facilitators included CRE metrics and workplace strategy, while capital expenditure and landlords inhibit alignment processes. The research provides more granular insight into the variables used in CRE decision-making and the factors that facilitate or inhibit the dynamic alignment process. Research limitations/implications The research set a specific scenario for the experts to consider. That could be regarded as small but there was clear evidence of saturation of expert knowledge. Additional face-to-face interviews with the experts may have generated further details on the thought processes of the experts. Practical implications The research provides more granular insight into the variables used in CRE decision-making and the factors that facilitate or inhibit the dynamic alignment process. Thereby providing CRE decision-makers with key elements for a decision model. Originality/value The research technique, causal network elicitation technique, uses semi-structured interviews to create decision networks, which is a technique that has not been widely applied to CRE research. The research provides a granular view of what are important inhibitors or facilitators of dynamic alignment of CRE to business strategy.
企业房地产动态调整的抑制因素与促进因素
目的本文旨在确定个体变量在企业房地产(CRE)决策过程中的重要性。设计/方法/方法9位专家收到了一个提出的方案,要求改变商业战略,减少个人面试的CRE。基于他们建议的回应,使用因果网络启发技术为每个专家建模决策网络,结合决策变量的效用和属性和利益的重要性权重。该决策模型为CRE经理在这种衰退时期所做的决策提供了决策-效益联系的图形表示。通过计算他们在访谈中提到的属性的感知重要性的提升比来确定CRE动态对齐的感知促进者,这些属性是将决策与利益联系起来的网络节点。促进因素包括CRE指标和工作场所战略,而资本支出和房东抑制了对齐过程。该研究为CRE决策中使用的变量以及促进或抑制动态对齐过程的因素提供了更细致的见解。研究的局限性/意义这项研究为专家们设定了一个具体的场景来考虑。这可能被认为是很小的,但有明确的证据表明,专家知识已经饱和。与专家的进一步面对面访谈可能会产生关于专家思维过程的进一步细节。实际意义本研究为CRE决策中使用的变量以及促进或抑制动态校准过程的因素提供了更细致的见解。从而为CRE决策者提供决策模型的关键元素。原创性/价值研究技术,因果网络引出技术,使用半结构化访谈来创建决策网络,这是一种尚未广泛应用于CRE研究的技术。这项研究提供了一个细粒度的观点,什么是重要的抑制因素或促进因素,使CRE与商业战略动态一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
18
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信