External validation of SPARE nephrometery score in predicting overall complications, trifecta and pentafecta outcomes following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

Q1 Medicine
G. Sharma, S. Tyagi, R. Mavuduru, G. Bora, A. Sharma, S. Devana, U. Gorsi, N. Kakkar, S. Singh
{"title":"External validation of SPARE nephrometery score in predicting overall complications, trifecta and pentafecta outcomes following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.","authors":"G. Sharma, S. Tyagi, R. Mavuduru, G. Bora, A. Sharma, S. Devana, U. Gorsi, N. Kakkar, S. Singh","doi":"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03972-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThere is an ongoing need and search for a simple yet accurate nephrometry scoring system for predicting the postoperative outcomes after partial nephrectomy (PN). SPARE, a simplified version of PADUA has been proposed as a predictor of postoperative complications following PN recently. However, this score has never been externally validated and assessed as a predictor of trifecta and pentafecta outcomes of PN. In the current study, we applied the SPARE scoring system to our robot-assisted PN cohort (RAPN).\n\n\nMETHODS\nProspectively maintained data of patients, who underwent RAPN between November 2014 to December 2018, was abstracted. Imaging was analyzed to calculate SPARE and RENAL nephrometry scores (RNS) by two Urologists independently. SPARE was compared with complications, trifecta outcomes, pentafecta outcomes, and RENAL nephrometry scoring (RNS).\n\n\nRESULTS\nData of 201 RAPN patients were analyzed. The mean SPARE score was 3 (range 0-11). 113 patients were classified as low risk, 64 as intermediate risk, and 24 as high risks. On multivariate analysis SPARE score alone predicted complications (OR 1.37, p=0.014) and trifecta outcomes (OR 0.75, p=0.000) while age (OR 0.96, p=0.042), preoperative eGFR (OR 0.97, p=0.001) and SPARE scores (OR 0.81, p=0.016) were predictors for pentafecta outcomes. Receiver operated curve (ROC) analysis between SPARE and RNS in predicting the complications; trifecta and pentafecta outcomes had a comparable area under the curve.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nOur study validates the SPARE nephrometry scoring system in predicting postoperative complications, trifecta, and pentafecta outcomes in a RAPN cohort. The predictive accuracy of SPARE is similar to RNS.","PeriodicalId":49015,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03972-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

BACKGROUND There is an ongoing need and search for a simple yet accurate nephrometry scoring system for predicting the postoperative outcomes after partial nephrectomy (PN). SPARE, a simplified version of PADUA has been proposed as a predictor of postoperative complications following PN recently. However, this score has never been externally validated and assessed as a predictor of trifecta and pentafecta outcomes of PN. In the current study, we applied the SPARE scoring system to our robot-assisted PN cohort (RAPN). METHODS Prospectively maintained data of patients, who underwent RAPN between November 2014 to December 2018, was abstracted. Imaging was analyzed to calculate SPARE and RENAL nephrometry scores (RNS) by two Urologists independently. SPARE was compared with complications, trifecta outcomes, pentafecta outcomes, and RENAL nephrometry scoring (RNS). RESULTS Data of 201 RAPN patients were analyzed. The mean SPARE score was 3 (range 0-11). 113 patients were classified as low risk, 64 as intermediate risk, and 24 as high risks. On multivariate analysis SPARE score alone predicted complications (OR 1.37, p=0.014) and trifecta outcomes (OR 0.75, p=0.000) while age (OR 0.96, p=0.042), preoperative eGFR (OR 0.97, p=0.001) and SPARE scores (OR 0.81, p=0.016) were predictors for pentafecta outcomes. Receiver operated curve (ROC) analysis between SPARE and RNS in predicting the complications; trifecta and pentafecta outcomes had a comparable area under the curve. CONCLUSIONS Our study validates the SPARE nephrometry scoring system in predicting postoperative complications, trifecta, and pentafecta outcomes in a RAPN cohort. The predictive accuracy of SPARE is similar to RNS.
外部验证SPARE肾计评分预测机器人辅助部分肾切除术后的总并发症、三影和五影结局。
研究背景:对于预测部分肾切除术(PN)后预后的简单而准确的肾脏测量评分系统的需求和探索一直存在。最近,一种简化版的PADUA被提出作为PN术后并发症的预测指标。然而,该评分从未被外部验证和评估为PN三效和五效结局的预测因子。在当前的研究中,我们将SPARE评分系统应用于我们的机器人辅助PN队列(RAPN)。方法选取2014年11月至2018年12月期间接受RAPN治疗的患者的前瞻性数据。由两名泌尿科医生独立分析影像,计算SPARE和RENAL肾脏测量评分(RNS)。比较SPARE的并发症、三效结局、五效结局和肾肾测量评分(RNS)。结果对201例RAPN患者资料进行分析。平均SPARE评分为3分(范围0-11)。113例为低危,64例为中危,24例为高危。在多因素分析中,单独的SPARE评分预测并发症(OR 1.37, p=0.014)和三联体结局(OR 0.75, p=0.000),而年龄(OR 0.96, p=0.042)、术前eGFR (OR 0.97, p=0.001)和SPARE评分(OR 0.81, p=0.016)是五联体结局的预测因子。SPARE与RNS预测并发症的ROC分析三效组和五效组的结果曲线下面积相当。我们的研究验证了SPARE肾测量评分系统在预测RAPN队列术后并发症、三联体和五联体结局方面的作用。SPARE的预测精度与RNS相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica publishes scientific papers on nephrology and urology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of Minerva opinion editorials, editorial comments, original articles, video illustrated articles, review articles and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信