Prenups Meant to Solve the Problem of the Agunah: Toward Compensation, Not "Mediation"

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
S. Weiss
{"title":"Prenups Meant to Solve the Problem of the Agunah: Toward Compensation, Not \"Mediation\"","authors":"S. Weiss","doi":"10.2979/NASHIM.31.1.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article begins by providing an overview of the prenups examined in the author's 1999 article, \"Sign at Your Own Risk: The 'RCA' Prenuptial May Prejudice the Fairness of Your Future Divorce Settlement,\" adding three important prenups introduced since 1999: the 2004 Agreement for Mutual Respect, the 2013 revised RCA prenup and the 2015 Tzohar prenup. It goes on to survey the different ways that non-ecclesiastical state civil courts in the U.S. and Israel have championed the cause of agunot, including compensating them for the harms they have endured. The article offers an explanation for why prenups have, to date, been reluctant to provide clear and unambiguous relief to Jewish women, and, finally, it proposes a draft of a prenup written by the Center for Women's Justice, an Israeli NGO founded and run by the author. The CWJ prenup () allows for compensatory relief via a secular civil court in the event of get refusal. The revised Lookstein prenup () provides for similar relief.","PeriodicalId":42498,"journal":{"name":"Nashim-A Journal of Jewish Womens Studies & Gender Issues","volume":"13 1","pages":"61 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nashim-A Journal of Jewish Womens Studies & Gender Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/NASHIM.31.1.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article begins by providing an overview of the prenups examined in the author's 1999 article, "Sign at Your Own Risk: The 'RCA' Prenuptial May Prejudice the Fairness of Your Future Divorce Settlement," adding three important prenups introduced since 1999: the 2004 Agreement for Mutual Respect, the 2013 revised RCA prenup and the 2015 Tzohar prenup. It goes on to survey the different ways that non-ecclesiastical state civil courts in the U.S. and Israel have championed the cause of agunot, including compensating them for the harms they have endured. The article offers an explanation for why prenups have, to date, been reluctant to provide clear and unambiguous relief to Jewish women, and, finally, it proposes a draft of a prenup written by the Center for Women's Justice, an Israeli NGO founded and run by the author. The CWJ prenup () allows for compensatory relief via a secular civil court in the event of get refusal. The revised Lookstein prenup () provides for similar relief.
婚前协议解决阿古纳问题:走向赔偿,而非“调解”
本文首先概述了作者在1999年的文章《自承担风险:‘RCA’婚前协议可能会影响你未来离婚协议的公平性》中所研究的婚前协议,并补充了自1999年以来引入的三个重要的婚前协议:2004年的相互尊重协议、2013年修订的RCA婚前协议和2015年的Tzohar婚前协议。它继续调查了美国和以色列的非教会州民事法院支持agunot事业的不同方式,包括赔偿他们所遭受的伤害。这篇文章解释了为什么婚前协议迄今为止不愿意为犹太妇女提供明确而明确的救济,最后,它提出了一份由妇女正义中心撰写的婚前协议草案,这是一个由作者创立和经营的以色列非政府组织。CWJ婚前协议允许在获得拒绝的情况下通过世俗民事法院获得补偿性救济。修订后的Lookstein婚前协议()提供了类似的救济。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信