Electronic justice as a mechanism for ensuring the right of access to justice in a pandemic: the experience of Ukraine and the EU

Q1 Social Sciences
O. Svitlychnyy, I. Matselyukh, Natalia Yaselska, Svitlana L. Glugovska, Olha I. Dyshleva
{"title":"Electronic justice as a mechanism for ensuring the right of access to justice in a pandemic: the experience of Ukraine and the EU","authors":"O. Svitlychnyy, I. Matselyukh, Natalia Yaselska, Svitlana L. Glugovska, Olha I. Dyshleva","doi":"10.1080/13600869.2023.2221820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The article analyzes the measures implemented by countries in the field of access and administration of justice, focusing on the use of electronic justice as a comprehensive remote mechanism during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study examines the experiences of the European Union and Ukraine to understand the effectiveness of electronic justice in ensuring the right of access to justice. Various scientific methods such as legal-statistical, systematic, formal-legal, and cybernetic methods were employed in the study. The analysis reveals that the measures taken by countries to prevent restrictions on human rights in the judicial system are not perfect and require further development. The study identifies key issues in the practical implementation of electronic justice and provides specific recommendations for improvement. The research fills a gap in comprehensive scientific studies on continuous and effective consideration of court cases during the pandemic. The practical and scientific value of the article lies in its relevance to practitioners and scholars worldwide, who are interested in the realization of the right of access to justice and the functioning of electronic justice. The national experiences and recommendations presented in the article can also be applied by European countries to enhance the effectiveness of their electronic justice systems.","PeriodicalId":53660,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Law, Computers and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Law, Computers and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2023.2221820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The article analyzes the measures implemented by countries in the field of access and administration of justice, focusing on the use of electronic justice as a comprehensive remote mechanism during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study examines the experiences of the European Union and Ukraine to understand the effectiveness of electronic justice in ensuring the right of access to justice. Various scientific methods such as legal-statistical, systematic, formal-legal, and cybernetic methods were employed in the study. The analysis reveals that the measures taken by countries to prevent restrictions on human rights in the judicial system are not perfect and require further development. The study identifies key issues in the practical implementation of electronic justice and provides specific recommendations for improvement. The research fills a gap in comprehensive scientific studies on continuous and effective consideration of court cases during the pandemic. The practical and scientific value of the article lies in its relevance to practitioners and scholars worldwide, who are interested in the realization of the right of access to justice and the functioning of electronic justice. The national experiences and recommendations presented in the article can also be applied by European countries to enhance the effectiveness of their electronic justice systems.
电子司法作为确保大流行病中诉诸司法权利的机制:乌克兰和欧盟的经验
摘要:本文分析了各国在司法获取和司法管理领域实施的措施,重点分析了2019冠状病毒病疫情期间电子司法作为一种综合远程机制的使用情况。该研究考察了欧洲联盟和乌克兰的经验,以了解电子司法在确保诉诸司法权利方面的有效性。研究中采用了法律-统计、系统、形式-法律和控制论等多种科学方法。分析表明,各国为防止司法制度中限制人权所采取的措施并不完善,需要进一步发展。该研究确定了电子司法实际实施中的关键问题,并提出了具体的改进建议。这项研究填补了在大流行期间对法院案件进行持续有效审议的全面科学研究的空白。本文的实用价值和科学价值在于它与世界范围内对司法救助权的实现和电子司法的功能感兴趣的从业者和学者的相关性。文章中提出的国家经验和建议也可由欧洲国家应用,以提高其电子司法系统的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信