Meta Analysis: The Effects of Attitude, Spouse Support, and Education Level on Men Participation in Male Contraceptive Use

Yuliana Yuvrista, A. Demartoto, Bhisma Murti
{"title":"Meta Analysis: The Effects of Attitude, Spouse Support, and Education Level on Men Participation in Male Contraceptive Use","authors":"Yuliana Yuvrista, A. Demartoto, Bhisma Murti","doi":"10.26911/thejhpb.2023.08.02.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: One of the government's strategies to support women's equal rights is to issue a policy in which people of reproductive age, both men and women, are expected to participate in the Family Planning program as an effort to raise awareness, willingness and ability of the community to improve their welfare independently. This study aims to analyze the influence of attitude, partner support, and level of education on men's participation in the use of contraception. Subjects and Method: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis. The study population was men of reproductive age. Intervention= positive attitude, strong partner support, and high education. Comparison= negative attitude, weak support, and low education. Outcome= the use of contraceptives. Data search was carried out syste¬ma¬tically using electronic databases from Pub¬med, Google Scholar, Europe PMC, Science Direct and Springer Link. Keywords used “Attitude” AND “Partner support” OR “Discuss with partner” AND “Educational status” OR “Educational level” AND “Men parti¬ci¬pa¬tion” OR “Men Involvement” AND “Contraception” OR “Family Plann¬ing” OR “Vasec-tomy” OR “Con¬dom”. The selection of primary articles used the PRISMA flowchart which was analyzed using Review Manager 5.3. Results: Six studies showed that men with a positive attitude were 3.69 times more likely to use contraception than men with a negative attitude (aOR= 3.69; 95% CI= 2.23 to 6.09; p<0.001). Six studies showed that men with strong partner support are 2.48 times more likely to use contraception than men with weak partner support (aOR= 2.48; 95% CI= 2.04 to 3.02; p<0.001). Eight studies showed that men with a high level of education increased the likelihood of male contra¬ceptive use (aOR= 2.07; CI 95%= 1.45 to 2.96). Conclusion: Positive attitude, strong partner support, and a high education increase the use of male contraceptives. Keywords: attitude, partner support, level of education, contraception.","PeriodicalId":16038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2023.08.02.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One of the government's strategies to support women's equal rights is to issue a policy in which people of reproductive age, both men and women, are expected to participate in the Family Planning program as an effort to raise awareness, willingness and ability of the community to improve their welfare independently. This study aims to analyze the influence of attitude, partner support, and level of education on men's participation in the use of contraception. Subjects and Method: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis. The study population was men of reproductive age. Intervention= positive attitude, strong partner support, and high education. Comparison= negative attitude, weak support, and low education. Outcome= the use of contraceptives. Data search was carried out syste¬ma¬tically using electronic databases from Pub¬med, Google Scholar, Europe PMC, Science Direct and Springer Link. Keywords used “Attitude” AND “Partner support” OR “Discuss with partner” AND “Educational status” OR “Educational level” AND “Men parti¬ci¬pa¬tion” OR “Men Involvement” AND “Contraception” OR “Family Plann¬ing” OR “Vasec-tomy” OR “Con¬dom”. The selection of primary articles used the PRISMA flowchart which was analyzed using Review Manager 5.3. Results: Six studies showed that men with a positive attitude were 3.69 times more likely to use contraception than men with a negative attitude (aOR= 3.69; 95% CI= 2.23 to 6.09; p<0.001). Six studies showed that men with strong partner support are 2.48 times more likely to use contraception than men with weak partner support (aOR= 2.48; 95% CI= 2.04 to 3.02; p<0.001). Eight studies showed that men with a high level of education increased the likelihood of male contra¬ceptive use (aOR= 2.07; CI 95%= 1.45 to 2.96). Conclusion: Positive attitude, strong partner support, and a high education increase the use of male contraceptives. Keywords: attitude, partner support, level of education, contraception.
元分析:态度、配偶支持、教育程度对男性避孕药具使用参与的影响
背景:政府支持妇女平等权利的战略之一是颁布一项政策,要求育龄男女都参与计划生育项目,以提高社会独立改善其福利的意识、意愿和能力。本研究旨在分析态度、伴侣支持、受教育程度对男性参与使用避孕措施的影响。研究对象和方法:这是一项系统综述和荟萃分析。研究对象为育龄男性。干预=积极的态度,强有力的伴侣支持,高学历。比较=消极态度,弱支持,低教育。结果=使用避孕药具。利用Pub - med、Google Scholar、european PMC、Science Direct和Springer Link等电子数据库进行了系统的数据检索。关键词使用“态度”、“伴侣支持”、“与伴侣讨论”、“受教育程度”、“男性参与”、“男性参与”、“避孕”、“计划生育”、“输精管切除术”、“避孕套”。主要文章的选择使用PRISMA流程图,并使用Review Manager 5.3进行分析。结果:6项研究表明,积极态度男性采取避孕措施的可能性是消极态度男性的3.69倍(aOR= 3.69;95% CI= 2.23 ~ 6.09;p < 0.001)。6项研究表明,伴侣支持强的男性使用避孕措施的可能性是伴侣支持弱的男性的2.48倍(aOR= 2.48;95% CI= 2.04 ~ 3.02;p < 0.001)。8项研究表明,受教育程度高的男性使用男性避孕药具的可能性增加(aOR= 2.07;CI 95%= 1.45 ~ 2.96)。结论:积极的态度、强有力的伴侣支持和高学历增加了男性避孕药具的使用。关键词:态度,伴侣支持,教育程度,避孕。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信