Internal pneumonolysis: A report on 200 cases

M.R.G.S., L.R.G.P. F.L. Wollaston (Assistant Medical Superintendent)
{"title":"Internal pneumonolysis: A report on 200 cases","authors":"M.R.G.S., L.R.G.P. F.L. Wollaston (Assistant Medical Superintendent)","doi":"10.1016/S0366-0850(40)80003-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Others have shown the advantages of selective collapse of the lung, and in this article its importance has been emphasised, an importance that is frequently not appreciated by those who use artificial pneumothorax, particularly by those who are responsible for the early stages but are not in contact with the late results. It is easy to be satisfied with the immediate control of symptoms, and to blame those responsible for the after-care when the partial pneumothorax obliterates or a relapse occurs. By not making use of all the means at our disposal the fullest benefit from peneumothorax cannot be expected. Once it has been decided that pneumothorax is the best treatment for a case, then selective collapse and relaxation of the diseased area of the lung should be aimed at, and this should remain the aim in every case until it has been proved unattainable. Since adhesions may cause trouble when the artificial pneumothorax is abandoned, they should be divided, even if doing no obvious harm either radiologically or symptomatically, unless the division is so difficult as to become dangerous. When symptoms of incomplete collapse are present, the division of adhesions becomes essential as being the only alternative to the abandonment of the artificial pneumothorax and the undertaking of other and more drastic forms of collapse therapy.</p><p>It has been shown that it is possible to attain selective collapse in a reasonable proportion of cases, and that this can be done with a minimum of danger and discomfort to the patient, and with no greater incidence of pleural effusion and empyema than that expected to occur in pneumothorax cases.</p><p>The general outline of the operative technique has been described, but it is felt that it is unnecessary to give a fuller description, as it is a technique that can be learned only by experience, and should not be embarked upon without study at a clinic where both this and other thoracic surgery is carried out.</p><p>The conclusion is that the division of adhesions is an operation that should be readily available in every sanatorium where artificial pneumothorax is used as a therapeutic measure, and that a thoracoscopy should be performed in every case of partial pneumothorax. Such is the value of complete or selective collapse that every adhesion should be divided, providing it can be done with reasonable safety. When assessing “reasonable safety” one must take into consideration the degree of benefit that the particular patient will derive from the division of his adhesions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9305,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Tuberculosis","volume":"34 1","pages":"Pages 13-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1940-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0366-0850(40)80003-3","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Tuberculosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0366085040800033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Others have shown the advantages of selective collapse of the lung, and in this article its importance has been emphasised, an importance that is frequently not appreciated by those who use artificial pneumothorax, particularly by those who are responsible for the early stages but are not in contact with the late results. It is easy to be satisfied with the immediate control of symptoms, and to blame those responsible for the after-care when the partial pneumothorax obliterates or a relapse occurs. By not making use of all the means at our disposal the fullest benefit from peneumothorax cannot be expected. Once it has been decided that pneumothorax is the best treatment for a case, then selective collapse and relaxation of the diseased area of the lung should be aimed at, and this should remain the aim in every case until it has been proved unattainable. Since adhesions may cause trouble when the artificial pneumothorax is abandoned, they should be divided, even if doing no obvious harm either radiologically or symptomatically, unless the division is so difficult as to become dangerous. When symptoms of incomplete collapse are present, the division of adhesions becomes essential as being the only alternative to the abandonment of the artificial pneumothorax and the undertaking of other and more drastic forms of collapse therapy.

It has been shown that it is possible to attain selective collapse in a reasonable proportion of cases, and that this can be done with a minimum of danger and discomfort to the patient, and with no greater incidence of pleural effusion and empyema than that expected to occur in pneumothorax cases.

The general outline of the operative technique has been described, but it is felt that it is unnecessary to give a fuller description, as it is a technique that can be learned only by experience, and should not be embarked upon without study at a clinic where both this and other thoracic surgery is carried out.

The conclusion is that the division of adhesions is an operation that should be readily available in every sanatorium where artificial pneumothorax is used as a therapeutic measure, and that a thoracoscopy should be performed in every case of partial pneumothorax. Such is the value of complete or selective collapse that every adhesion should be divided, providing it can be done with reasonable safety. When assessing “reasonable safety” one must take into consideration the degree of benefit that the particular patient will derive from the division of his adhesions.

内溶性肺炎200例报告
其他研究也显示了选择性肺塌陷的优势,本文强调了其重要性,而那些使用人工气胸的人,特别是那些对早期阶段负有责任但与晚期结果没有联系的人,往往没有意识到这种重要性。当气胸部分消失或复发时,很容易满足于症状的立即控制,而责怪那些负责术后护理的人。如果不利用我们所掌握的所有手段,就不能指望从胸腔中获得最大的好处。一旦确定气胸是一个病例的最佳治疗方法,那么就应该针对肺病变区域的选择性塌陷和松弛,并且这应该一直是每个病例的目标,直到证明它无法实现为止。由于粘连在放弃人工气胸时可能会引起麻烦,因此即使在放射学或症状上没有明显的危害,也应将粘连分开,除非分离困难到危险的程度。当出现不完全塌陷的症状时,分离粘连变得至关重要,因为这是放弃人工气胸和进行其他更激烈形式的塌陷治疗的唯一选择。研究表明,在合理比例的病例中,选择性塌陷是可能的,这可以在对患者的危险和不适最小的情况下完成,并且与气胸病例相比,胸膜积液和脓肿的发生率不会更高。手术技术的大致轮廓已经描述过了,但认为没有必要给出更详细的描述,因为这是一种只能通过经验来学习的技术,不应该在没有研究的情况下就开始在诊所进行这种和其他胸外科手术。结论是,粘连的分离是一项手术,应该在每个疗养院,人工气胸作为一种治疗措施,并应在每一个部分性气胸的情况下进行胸腔镜检查。这就是完全或选择性塌陷的价值,每个粘连都应该分开,只要它能在合理的安全情况下完成。在评估“合理安全性”时,必须考虑到特定患者将从其粘连分离中获得的益处程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信