The potency of cooperative integrated reading and composition in building chemistry students’ scientific literacy and self-regulated learning

Q3 Physics and Astronomy
Habiddin Habiddin, Cyndi Yanis Saputri, Aman Santoso
{"title":"The potency of cooperative integrated reading and composition in building chemistry students’ scientific literacy and self-regulated learning","authors":"Habiddin Habiddin, Cyndi Yanis Saputri, Aman Santoso","doi":"10.26850/1678-4618eqj.v48.3.2023.p27-35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effect of the Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) approach on scientific literacy and students’ regulated learning in colligative properties of solution was explored. The contribution of the CIRC approach was measured by investigating whether the improvement in scientific literacy and regulated learning of the CIRC students are more significant than the improvement for students with the Direct Instructional Teaching Method (DITM) after experiencing two different teaching approaches. Two groups of students (experiment and comparison) from a public senior high school in East Java, Indonesia, were involved. The experimental group experienced the colligative properties of solution with the CIRC teaching approach, while the comparison group experienced the DITM one. We found that scientific literacy and self-regulated learning of students with CIRC are higher than students with DITM, implying the potency of this approach to be applied to other chemistry topics. This study indicates that CIRC could be used to improve students’ scientific literacy and self-regulated learning for other chemistry topics. The implication of this study for teaching colligative properties of solution is also discussed.","PeriodicalId":35894,"journal":{"name":"Ecletica Quimica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecletica Quimica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26850/1678-4618eqj.v48.3.2023.p27-35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Physics and Astronomy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effect of the Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) approach on scientific literacy and students’ regulated learning in colligative properties of solution was explored. The contribution of the CIRC approach was measured by investigating whether the improvement in scientific literacy and regulated learning of the CIRC students are more significant than the improvement for students with the Direct Instructional Teaching Method (DITM) after experiencing two different teaching approaches. Two groups of students (experiment and comparison) from a public senior high school in East Java, Indonesia, were involved. The experimental group experienced the colligative properties of solution with the CIRC teaching approach, while the comparison group experienced the DITM one. We found that scientific literacy and self-regulated learning of students with CIRC are higher than students with DITM, implying the potency of this approach to be applied to other chemistry topics. This study indicates that CIRC could be used to improve students’ scientific literacy and self-regulated learning for other chemistry topics. The implication of this study for teaching colligative properties of solution is also discussed.
合作综合阅读与写作在培养化学学生科学素养与自主学习中的作用
探讨了合作综合阅读与写作(CIRC)方法对学生科学素养和对解的依数性的调节学习的影响。通过考察在经历两种不同的教学方法后,CIRC学生在科学素养和规范学习方面的改善是否比直接教学方法(DITM)学生的改善更显著,来衡量CIRC方法的贡献。参与了印度尼西亚东爪哇一所公立高中的两组学生(实验和比较)。实验组在CIRC教学法中体验到解的依数性,而对照组在DITM教学法中体验到解的依数性。我们发现CIRC学生的科学素养和自我调节学习高于DITM学生,这意味着这种方法在其他化学主题上的应用潜力。本研究表明CIRC可用于提高学生的科学素养和其他化学主题的自主学习。并讨论了本研究对解法依数性质教学的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecletica Quimica
Ecletica Quimica Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信