Exploring stakeholder perceptions of tax reform failures and their proposed solutions: a developing country perspective

IF 3.5 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Arshad Hasan, Naeem Sheikh, M. Farooq
{"title":"Exploring stakeholder perceptions of tax reform failures and their proposed solutions: a developing country perspective","authors":"Arshad Hasan, Naeem Sheikh, M. Farooq","doi":"10.1108/medar-03-2023-1961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to examine why tax reforms fail and explores how tax collection can be improved within a developing country context.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nData comprise 28 semi-structured interviews with taxpayers, tax experts and tax authority personnel based in Pakistan. The results are analysed using a combined lens of taxpayer trust and tax agencies’ capabilities.\n\n\nFindings\nTax reforms failed to build taxpayers’ trust and tax agencies’ capabilities. Building trust is challenging and demands extensive ongoing engagement with taxpayers while yielding gradual permanent results. This requires enhancing confidence in government; educating taxpayers; removing complexities; introducing transparency and accountability in tax agencies’ operations and the tax system; promoting procedural and distributive justice; and reversing perceptions of corruption through reconciliation and stakeholder inclusivity. Developing tax agencies’ capabilities requires upgrading outdated technologies, systems and processes; implementing governance and organisational reforms; introducing an oversight board; and recruiting and training skilled professionals.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe findings can assist policymakers and tax collection authorities in understanding why tax reforms fail and identifying potential solutions.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study contributes to the emerging literature by exploring tax administration failures in developing countries. It contributes to the literature by engaging stakeholders to understand why reforms fail and potential solutions to stimulate tax revenues.\n","PeriodicalId":18453,"journal":{"name":"Meditari Accountancy Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meditari Accountancy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/medar-03-2023-1961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine why tax reforms fail and explores how tax collection can be improved within a developing country context. Design/methodology/approach Data comprise 28 semi-structured interviews with taxpayers, tax experts and tax authority personnel based in Pakistan. The results are analysed using a combined lens of taxpayer trust and tax agencies’ capabilities. Findings Tax reforms failed to build taxpayers’ trust and tax agencies’ capabilities. Building trust is challenging and demands extensive ongoing engagement with taxpayers while yielding gradual permanent results. This requires enhancing confidence in government; educating taxpayers; removing complexities; introducing transparency and accountability in tax agencies’ operations and the tax system; promoting procedural and distributive justice; and reversing perceptions of corruption through reconciliation and stakeholder inclusivity. Developing tax agencies’ capabilities requires upgrading outdated technologies, systems and processes; implementing governance and organisational reforms; introducing an oversight board; and recruiting and training skilled professionals. Practical implications The findings can assist policymakers and tax collection authorities in understanding why tax reforms fail and identifying potential solutions. Originality/value This study contributes to the emerging literature by exploring tax administration failures in developing countries. It contributes to the literature by engaging stakeholders to understand why reforms fail and potential solutions to stimulate tax revenues.
探讨利益相关者对税制改革失败的看法及其提出的解决方案:一个发展中国家的视角
本研究旨在研究税收改革失败的原因,并探讨如何在发展中国家的背景下改善税收。设计/方法/方法数据包括对巴基斯坦纳税人、税务专家和税务机关人员进行的28次半结构化访谈。分析结果采用了纳税人信任和税务机构能力的综合视角。税务改革未能建立纳税人的信任和税务机构的能力。建立信任是具有挑战性的,需要与纳税人进行广泛的持续接触,同时产生逐步持久的结果。这需要增强对政府的信心;教育的纳税人;消除复杂性;在税务机关的运作和税收制度中引入透明度和问责制;促进程序和分配公正;通过和解和利益相关者包容来扭转对腐败的看法。发展税务机关的能力需要更新过时的技术、系统和流程;推行管治和组织改革;设立监督委员会;招聘和培训熟练的专业人员。实际意义研究结果可以帮助政策制定者和税收征管部门理解税收改革失败的原因,并找出潜在的解决方案。独创性/价值本研究通过探索发展中国家的税收管理失败,为新兴文献做出了贡献。它通过让利益相关者了解改革失败的原因以及刺激税收的潜在解决方案,为文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Meditari Accountancy Research
Meditari Accountancy Research BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Meditari Accountancy Research (MEDAR). MEDAR takes its name from the Latin for constantly pondering, suggesting a journey towards a better understanding of accountancy related matters through research. Innovative and interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged. The journal is a double blind refereed publication that welcomes manuscripts using diverse research methods that address a wide range of accountancy related topics, where the terms accountancy and accounting are interpreted broadly. Manuscripts should be theoretically underpinned. Topics may include, but are not limited to: Auditing, Financial reporting, Impact of accounting on organizations, Impact of accounting on capital markets, Impact of accounting on individuals, Management accounting, Public sector accounting, Regulation of the profession, Risk management, Social and environmental disclosure, Impact of taxation on society, Accounting education, Accounting ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信