Institutional channeling and opportunity recognition: heterogeneous knowledge corridors as pathways to social entrepreneurship

IF 2.8 Q2 BUSINESS
Jason Lortie, K. Cox, Philip T. Roundy, L. Jarvis
{"title":"Institutional channeling and opportunity recognition: heterogeneous knowledge corridors as pathways to social entrepreneurship","authors":"Jason Lortie, K. Cox, Philip T. Roundy, L. Jarvis","doi":"10.1108/sej-01-2022-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nDespite intense scholarly interest in social entrepreneurship, opportunity recognition remains a poorly understood facet of the phenomenon. Linkages between the micro- and macro-level forces shaping social entrepreneurship are particularly unclear. The purpose of this paper is to introduce the concept of institutional channeling, the process by which institutions socialize and direct individuals into specific knowledge corridors, as a key mechanism influencing the ability of entrepreneurs to identify and create different types of opportunities.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThrough a synthesis of institutional theory and the knowledge corridor thesis, this research offers a theory explaining why some individuals are able to recognize opportunities for social entrepreneurship.\n\n\nFindings\nThe authors develop a conceptual model that explains how non-contested institutions channel entrepreneurs into homogeneous knowledge corridors, which support the creation of purely for-profit and non-profit organizations. By contrast, experiences involving institutional plurality activate and enable heterogeneous knowledge corridors, which are associated with the ability to recognize opportunities, like social entrepreneurship, that blend institutions.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe central contribution of this paper is an explanation of why certain individuals, because of their institutional experiences, are more likely than others to recognize for-profit, non-profit and social opportunities. This article highlights that previous efforts at addressing this issue were predominantly centered at the micro level of analysis and focus on individual entrepreneurs and their identities, personality traits and social networks. Although these studies have shed light on important facets of opportunity recognition, they do not sufficiently explain the influence that institutions can have on the micro processes involved in social entrepreneurship opportunity recognition.\n","PeriodicalId":46809,"journal":{"name":"Social Enterprise Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Enterprise Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sej-01-2022-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose Despite intense scholarly interest in social entrepreneurship, opportunity recognition remains a poorly understood facet of the phenomenon. Linkages between the micro- and macro-level forces shaping social entrepreneurship are particularly unclear. The purpose of this paper is to introduce the concept of institutional channeling, the process by which institutions socialize and direct individuals into specific knowledge corridors, as a key mechanism influencing the ability of entrepreneurs to identify and create different types of opportunities. Design/methodology/approach Through a synthesis of institutional theory and the knowledge corridor thesis, this research offers a theory explaining why some individuals are able to recognize opportunities for social entrepreneurship. Findings The authors develop a conceptual model that explains how non-contested institutions channel entrepreneurs into homogeneous knowledge corridors, which support the creation of purely for-profit and non-profit organizations. By contrast, experiences involving institutional plurality activate and enable heterogeneous knowledge corridors, which are associated with the ability to recognize opportunities, like social entrepreneurship, that blend institutions. Originality/value The central contribution of this paper is an explanation of why certain individuals, because of their institutional experiences, are more likely than others to recognize for-profit, non-profit and social opportunities. This article highlights that previous efforts at addressing this issue were predominantly centered at the micro level of analysis and focus on individual entrepreneurs and their identities, personality traits and social networks. Although these studies have shed light on important facets of opportunity recognition, they do not sufficiently explain the influence that institutions can have on the micro processes involved in social entrepreneurship opportunity recognition.
制度引导和机会识别:异质知识走廊作为社会创业的途径
尽管学术界对社会企业家精神有浓厚的兴趣,但机会识别仍然是这一现象的一个鲜为人知的方面。塑造社会企业家精神的微观和宏观力量之间的联系尤其不清楚。本文的目的是引入制度渠道的概念,即制度社会化并引导个人进入特定知识走廊的过程,作为影响企业家识别和创造不同类型机会能力的关键机制。设计/方法/途径通过对制度理论和知识走廊理论的综合,本研究提供了一种理论来解释为什么有些人能够认识到社会创业的机会。作者开发了一个概念模型,解释了无竞争机构如何将企业家引导到同质的知识走廊中,这支持了纯粹营利性和非营利性组织的创建。相比之下,涉及制度多元性的经验激活并使异质知识走廊成为可能,这与识别机会的能力有关,如社会企业家精神,融合了制度。原创性/价值本文的核心贡献在于解释了为什么某些个体,由于其机构经历,比其他人更有可能认识到营利性、非营利性和社会机会。本文强调,以前解决这一问题的努力主要集中在微观层面的分析上,关注个体企业家及其身份、个性特征和社会网络。虽然这些研究揭示了机会识别的重要方面,但它们并没有充分解释制度对社会创业机会识别所涉及的微观过程的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信