PRODUCTIVITY OF SELECTED SUFFIXES IN THE TERMS OF MATHEMATICS

Marianna Hudcovičová
{"title":"PRODUCTIVITY OF SELECTED SUFFIXES IN THE TERMS OF MATHEMATICS","authors":"Marianna Hudcovičová","doi":"10.35120/sciencej020107h","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the analysis of mathematical terms, i.e. simple nouns. Complex terms are avoided in order to prepare a detailed lexico-grammatical analysis. The research examines the term formation within the word class of nouns. Origins of the English and Slovak terms are analysed, described and compared. Latin and Greek languages are languages of science for the English language. The original languages of terms in both languages. Furthemore, Slovak terminological equivalents are compared with the English ones in term preference the Latin/Greek term or the native term if exists. According to term formation processes, the following suffixes representing bound morphemes are analysed: -er, -or, -ion. The terms formed by affixation using the selected suffixes are compared with the Slovak counterparts in terminology of mathematics. Terms are analysed according to principles for term formation. The following principles should be followed in the formation of terms and appellations, as far as possible and as appropriate to the language: transparency; ⎯ consistency; ⎯ appropriateness, linguistic economy; ⎯ derivability and compoundability; ⎯ linguistic correctness; ⎯ preference for native language. Subject of analysis are terms taken from the Slovak National Corpus 10.0, i.e. English –Slovak Parallel Corpus 4.0 en, Slovak –English Parallel Corpus 4.0 sk and the British National Corpus. In the research, electronic corpora are applied. They use mathematical ad statistical methods to evaluate e.g. occurrence, frequency, collocability of words. The previous mentioned methods are taken into consideration and help to prepare the effective, precise and objective analysis of the planned analysis. The research is based on both languages and comparison of terms in both parts of the corpus. Specific trends and tendencies in the strategies of term formation are analysed. Descriptive method is used and the methods of quantitative and qualitative analysis are applied. Due to analysis of two languages, contrastive and comparative approaches are entailed. Terminology records of terms are examined from lexico-grammatical point of view and on the basis of term-formation tendencies in each analysed language. i.e. Slovak language and English language. Records include entry, identification number, reference to the term, synonyms, subject field, formula, abbreviation, context, reference to the context, definition, reference to the definition.","PeriodicalId":9803,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Science International Journal","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Science International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej020107h","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article deals with the analysis of mathematical terms, i.e. simple nouns. Complex terms are avoided in order to prepare a detailed lexico-grammatical analysis. The research examines the term formation within the word class of nouns. Origins of the English and Slovak terms are analysed, described and compared. Latin and Greek languages are languages of science for the English language. The original languages of terms in both languages. Furthemore, Slovak terminological equivalents are compared with the English ones in term preference the Latin/Greek term or the native term if exists. According to term formation processes, the following suffixes representing bound morphemes are analysed: -er, -or, -ion. The terms formed by affixation using the selected suffixes are compared with the Slovak counterparts in terminology of mathematics. Terms are analysed according to principles for term formation. The following principles should be followed in the formation of terms and appellations, as far as possible and as appropriate to the language: transparency; ⎯ consistency; ⎯ appropriateness, linguistic economy; ⎯ derivability and compoundability; ⎯ linguistic correctness; ⎯ preference for native language. Subject of analysis are terms taken from the Slovak National Corpus 10.0, i.e. English –Slovak Parallel Corpus 4.0 en, Slovak –English Parallel Corpus 4.0 sk and the British National Corpus. In the research, electronic corpora are applied. They use mathematical ad statistical methods to evaluate e.g. occurrence, frequency, collocability of words. The previous mentioned methods are taken into consideration and help to prepare the effective, precise and objective analysis of the planned analysis. The research is based on both languages and comparison of terms in both parts of the corpus. Specific trends and tendencies in the strategies of term formation are analysed. Descriptive method is used and the methods of quantitative and qualitative analysis are applied. Due to analysis of two languages, contrastive and comparative approaches are entailed. Terminology records of terms are examined from lexico-grammatical point of view and on the basis of term-formation tendencies in each analysed language. i.e. Slovak language and English language. Records include entry, identification number, reference to the term, synonyms, subject field, formula, abbreviation, context, reference to the context, definition, reference to the definition.
数学术语中选定后缀的生产力
这篇文章讨论数学术语,即简单名词的分析。为了准备详细的词汇语法分析,避免使用复杂的术语。本研究考察了名词词类中的术语形成。分析、描述和比较了英语和斯洛伐克语术语的起源。拉丁语和希腊语是英语的科学语言。两种语言中术语的原始语言。此外,斯洛伐克语的术语对等物与英语的术语对等物在术语偏好上进行了比较,如果存在拉丁/希腊术语或本地术语。根据词的形成过程,分析了以下表示绑定语素的后缀:-er, -or, -ion。使用所选后缀的词缀形成的术语与斯洛伐克的数学术语相比较。根据术语形成原则对术语进行分析。在措词和称谓的构成方面,应尽可能并酌情与语言相适应,遵循下列原则:透明度;⎯一致性;恰当性,语言经济;推导性和复合性;-语言正确性;-母语偏好。分析的主题是取自斯洛伐克国家语料库10.0的术语,即英语-斯洛伐克语平行语料库4.0 en,斯洛伐克语-英语平行语料库4.0 sk和英国国家语料库。本研究采用了电子语料库。他们使用数学和统计方法来评估单词的出现、频率和可搭配性。考虑到前面提到的方法,有助于准备计划分析的有效、精确和客观的分析。该研究基于两种语言和语料库中两部分术语的比较。分析了期限形成策略的具体趋势和趋势。本文采用描述法,定量分析和定性分析相结合的方法。由于对两种语言的分析,需要采用对比和比较的方法。从词汇语法的角度,根据所分析的每种语言的术语形成倾向,对术语记录进行检查。即斯洛伐克语和英语。记录包括条目、标识号、对术语的引用、同义词、主题字段、公式、缩写、上下文、对上下文的引用、定义、对定义的引用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信