Perspectives of Audit Quality: An Analysis

Noor Adwa Sulaiman, F. Yasin, R. Muhamad
{"title":"Perspectives of Audit Quality: An Analysis","authors":"Noor Adwa Sulaiman, F. Yasin, R. Muhamad","doi":"10.22452/AJAP.VOL11NO1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research aim: This paper reviews the research literature and publications relevant to audit quality. The authors identify three main perspectives (academic research, professional and regulatory) related to audit quality that could add to our understanding of the concepts and factors affecting audit quality in practice. For each reviewed perspective, the authors present and summarise the key findings. \nDesign/ Methodology/ Approach: This study reviews a total of 84 empirical studies and publications ranging from year 1980 to year 2016. Further, this paper links academic research to publications on the topic issued by professional practitioners and regulators. \nResearch findings: Based on the analysis, the review reveals three main findings. First, the review identifies multifaceted concepts of audit quality and the various academic research approaches that have been carried out to assess audit quality. Second, audit quality in practice is not only affected by various internal factors within the accounting firms but is also influenced by various contextual factors in which the accounting firms operate. Third, much of the prior research employs an archival approach that potentially provides limited information about the effect of the contextual setting in actual audit practices, which is important to enhance our understanding of audit quality. \nTheoretical contribution/ Originality: It provides some guidance for future academic research related to audit quality. \nPractitioner/ Policy implication: The research and reports reviewed in this paper will be useful to researchers, audit practitioners, policymakers and others who are concerned with the quality of audit services to understand the various conceptions of audit quality and the important factors affecting audit quality in practice. \nResearch limitation/ Implications: The analysis of the audit quality from the three main perspectives provided in this study paves the way for embarking on promising and relevant future research, which is needed to further substantiate and enrich the academic understanding on concepts and factors affecting audit quality. More research is needed to understand this issue better and to move towards a policy resolution. \nKeywords: Audit Quality, Auditing, Literature Review, Research Opportunities \nType of manuscript: Literature review \nJEL Classification: M41, M42, M48, L84","PeriodicalId":33532,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Accounting Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Accounting Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/AJAP.VOL11NO1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Research aim: This paper reviews the research literature and publications relevant to audit quality. The authors identify three main perspectives (academic research, professional and regulatory) related to audit quality that could add to our understanding of the concepts and factors affecting audit quality in practice. For each reviewed perspective, the authors present and summarise the key findings. Design/ Methodology/ Approach: This study reviews a total of 84 empirical studies and publications ranging from year 1980 to year 2016. Further, this paper links academic research to publications on the topic issued by professional practitioners and regulators. Research findings: Based on the analysis, the review reveals three main findings. First, the review identifies multifaceted concepts of audit quality and the various academic research approaches that have been carried out to assess audit quality. Second, audit quality in practice is not only affected by various internal factors within the accounting firms but is also influenced by various contextual factors in which the accounting firms operate. Third, much of the prior research employs an archival approach that potentially provides limited information about the effect of the contextual setting in actual audit practices, which is important to enhance our understanding of audit quality. Theoretical contribution/ Originality: It provides some guidance for future academic research related to audit quality. Practitioner/ Policy implication: The research and reports reviewed in this paper will be useful to researchers, audit practitioners, policymakers and others who are concerned with the quality of audit services to understand the various conceptions of audit quality and the important factors affecting audit quality in practice. Research limitation/ Implications: The analysis of the audit quality from the three main perspectives provided in this study paves the way for embarking on promising and relevant future research, which is needed to further substantiate and enrich the academic understanding on concepts and factors affecting audit quality. More research is needed to understand this issue better and to move towards a policy resolution. Keywords: Audit Quality, Auditing, Literature Review, Research Opportunities Type of manuscript: Literature review JEL Classification: M41, M42, M48, L84
审计质量的视角:分析
研究目的:综述了审计质量相关的研究文献和出版物。作者确定了与审计质量相关的三个主要观点(学术研究,专业和监管),可以增加我们对实践中影响审计质量的概念和因素的理解。对于每一个回顾的观点,作者提出并总结了主要发现。设计/方法/方法:本研究共回顾了1980年至2016年的84项实证研究和出版物。此外,本文将学术研究与专业从业者和监管机构发布的关于该主题的出版物联系起来。研究发现:基于分析,综述揭示了三个主要发现。首先,本综述确定了审计质量的多方面概念以及为评估审计质量而开展的各种学术研究方法。其次,审计质量不仅受到会计师事务所内部各种因素的影响,还受到会计师事务所所处的各种环境因素的影响。第三,许多先前的研究采用了一种档案方法,可能提供有限的关于背景设置在实际审计实践中的影响的信息,这对于增强我们对审计质量的理解很重要。理论贡献/独创性:对今后审计质量相关的学术研究具有一定的指导意义。从业者/政策启示:本文回顾的研究和报告将有助于研究人员、审计从业者、政策制定者和其他关注审计服务质量的人了解审计质量的各种概念和影响审计质量的重要因素。研究局限/启示:本研究从三个主要角度对审计质量进行分析,为今后开展有前景的相关研究铺平了道路,需要进一步充实和丰富学术界对审计质量的概念和影响因素的认识。需要更多的研究来更好地理解这个问题,并朝着政策解决的方向迈进。关键词:审计质量,审计,文献综述,研究机会稿件类型:文献综述JEL分类:M41, M42, M48, L84
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信