Predatory Innovation in the Digital Era

Amit Bansal, Shruti Gupta, Priyanshi Desai, Manasvi Aiyer
{"title":"Predatory Innovation in the Digital Era","authors":"Amit Bansal, Shruti Gupta, Priyanshi Desai, Manasvi Aiyer","doi":"10.54425/ccijoclp.v3.75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current wave of the industrial revolution has altered humankind in all ways possible. With evolution comes the possibility of conflict, especially when the intent is to eliminate competition rather than revolutionise the product or service delivery. One such conduct is predatory innovation, which involves an incumbent altering one or more technical elements of a product to limit or eliminate competition under the guise of innovation. Discourse on the topic suggests that the jurisprudence has not yet generalised the etiquette of predatory innovation, which resonates with the challenges encountered by antitrust practitioners while assessing such conduct. Thus, in this paper, we aim to examine conduct that is construed as predatory innovation, given its increasing relevance and undiscovered potential harm. We present economic literature that discusses different types of predatory innovation and describe economic tests that are equipped to assess anti-competitive harm. Subsequently, we conduct an in-depth review of select cases that exhibit predatory innovation. We conclude by suggesting a way forward for competition assessment of predatory innovation.","PeriodicalId":68002,"journal":{"name":"竞争法律与政策评论","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"竞争法律与政策评论","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54425/ccijoclp.v3.75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current wave of the industrial revolution has altered humankind in all ways possible. With evolution comes the possibility of conflict, especially when the intent is to eliminate competition rather than revolutionise the product or service delivery. One such conduct is predatory innovation, which involves an incumbent altering one or more technical elements of a product to limit or eliminate competition under the guise of innovation. Discourse on the topic suggests that the jurisprudence has not yet generalised the etiquette of predatory innovation, which resonates with the challenges encountered by antitrust practitioners while assessing such conduct. Thus, in this paper, we aim to examine conduct that is construed as predatory innovation, given its increasing relevance and undiscovered potential harm. We present economic literature that discusses different types of predatory innovation and describe economic tests that are equipped to assess anti-competitive harm. Subsequently, we conduct an in-depth review of select cases that exhibit predatory innovation. We conclude by suggesting a way forward for competition assessment of predatory innovation.
数字时代的掠夺性创新
当前的工业革命浪潮已经从各个方面改变了人类。随着进化而来的是冲突的可能性,尤其是当其意图是消除竞争,而不是彻底改变产品或服务交付时。其中一种行为是掠夺性创新,即在位者在创新的幌子下改变产品的一个或多个技术要素,以限制或消除竞争。关于该主题的论述表明,法理学尚未概括掠夺性创新的礼仪,这与反垄断从业者在评估此类行为时遇到的挑战产生了共鸣。因此,在本文中,我们的目标是研究被解释为掠夺性创新的行为,鉴于其日益增长的相关性和未被发现的潜在危害。我们提供了讨论不同类型掠夺性创新的经济文献,并描述了用于评估反竞争损害的经济测试。随后,我们对一些表现出掠夺性创新的案例进行了深入的审查。最后,我们提出了掠夺性创新竞争评估的前进方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书