An Observational Prospective Study on Prevalence and Monitoring of Adverse Drug Reactions in Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital

Sneha Gangisetty, Sowmya Nadendla, P. Goka, Zahedabano, N. Prasanthi, N. Rao, R. Nadendla
{"title":"An Observational Prospective Study on Prevalence and Monitoring of Adverse Drug Reactions in Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital","authors":"Sneha Gangisetty, Sowmya Nadendla, P. Goka, Zahedabano, N. Prasanthi, N. Rao, R. Nadendla","doi":"10.9734/BJPR/2016/24288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To study the prevalence of ADRs in the in-patient departments of General Medicine, Pediatrics, Dermatology at tertiary care hospital. Materials and Methods: An Observational Prospective Study was designed from February to July 2015 in which Prevalence of ADR was calculated. A total of 107 ADR’s were observed from 1334 patients. ADR’s were evaluated for causality by WHO-UMC Scale, Naranjo’s scale, Severity by Hartwig & Siegel scale, Preventability by Schumock & Thornton and classification by Rawling & Thompson criteria. Results: Prevalence of ADR’s was found to be 8.02% and male to female ratio was 0.81. ADR’s mostly occurred in the age group 31-40 (27.10%). Skin was found to be the most commonly affected organ system (24.29%) among which rashes and urticaria were the most common type of ADR’S reported, majority of the adverse drug reactions were due to Antimicrobials (22.42%). For Casuality of ADR’s according to Naranjo Scale 26.16% of adverse drug reactions were assessed Original Research Article Gangisetty et al.; BJPR, 11(2): 1-9, 2016; Article no.BJPR.24288 2 to be probable, using WHO-UMC scale 33.64% were considered as probable. Similarly Severity assessment shows majority of the reactions as moderate (53.27%). Conclusion: By early detection of adverse drug reactions, necessary action can be taken to prevent mortality & morbidity from such reactions.","PeriodicalId":9320,"journal":{"name":"British journal of pharmaceutical research","volume":"25 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of pharmaceutical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/BJPR/2016/24288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Objective: To study the prevalence of ADRs in the in-patient departments of General Medicine, Pediatrics, Dermatology at tertiary care hospital. Materials and Methods: An Observational Prospective Study was designed from February to July 2015 in which Prevalence of ADR was calculated. A total of 107 ADR’s were observed from 1334 patients. ADR’s were evaluated for causality by WHO-UMC Scale, Naranjo’s scale, Severity by Hartwig & Siegel scale, Preventability by Schumock & Thornton and classification by Rawling & Thompson criteria. Results: Prevalence of ADR’s was found to be 8.02% and male to female ratio was 0.81. ADR’s mostly occurred in the age group 31-40 (27.10%). Skin was found to be the most commonly affected organ system (24.29%) among which rashes and urticaria were the most common type of ADR’S reported, majority of the adverse drug reactions were due to Antimicrobials (22.42%). For Casuality of ADR’s according to Naranjo Scale 26.16% of adverse drug reactions were assessed Original Research Article Gangisetty et al.; BJPR, 11(2): 1-9, 2016; Article no.BJPR.24288 2 to be probable, using WHO-UMC scale 33.64% were considered as probable. Similarly Severity assessment shows majority of the reactions as moderate (53.27%). Conclusion: By early detection of adverse drug reactions, necessary action can be taken to prevent mortality & morbidity from such reactions.
三级护理教学医院药物不良反应发生率及监测的观察性前瞻性研究
目的:了解三级医院内科、儿科、皮肤科住院患者不良反应的发生情况。材料与方法:2015年2月至7月设计一项观察性前瞻性研究,计算不良反应发生率。1334例患者共观察到107例不良反应。ADR的因果关系采用WHO-UMC量表、Naranjo量表、严重性采用Hartwig & Siegel量表、可预防性采用Schumock & Thornton量表,分类采用Rawling & Thompson标准。结果:不良反应发生率为8.02%,男女之比为0.81。不良反应主要发生在31 ~ 40岁年龄组(27.10%)。皮肤是最常见的器官系统(24.29%),其中皮疹和荨麻疹是最常见的ADR报告类型,大多数药物不良反应是由抗菌药物引起的(22.42%)。根据Naranjo量表对药品不良反应的致死率进行评估的不良反应发生率为26.16%;生物工程学报,11(2):1-9,2016;文章no.BJPR。采用WHO-UMC量表,认为可能病例数为33.64%。同样,严重程度评估显示大多数反应为中度(53.27%)。结论:早期发现药物不良反应,可以采取必要的措施,预防药物不良反应的死亡和发病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信