Chest drainage in clinical practice - how much do we think we know?

A. Savovic, A. Turina, Sindi Novoselec, Danijela Pikija, Ivana Zubak, Tanja Kit
{"title":"Chest drainage in clinical practice - how much do we think we know?","authors":"A. Savovic, A. Turina, Sindi Novoselec, Danijela Pikija, Ivana Zubak, Tanja Kit","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Non-surgical departments have a growing need for the intervention of thoracic surgeons in resolving complications in patients with chest drain. Based on these data, there was a need for the formation of education of nurses about chest drainage. Objective was feedback on the effectiveness of nursing education. Aim: 1) To determine the initial level of knowledge about chest drainage of participants. 2) To determine the level of knowledge of participants after completing the course. Method: Data were collected from conducted courses in 2016 and 2017 year. The total number of participants was 417. The instrument used in the study was a questionnaire of knowledge designed to meet the needs of the research and evaluation of the course. The questionnaire contained 25 questions in seven thematic units. Results: 1) Average knowledge in the initial test was 65%, in the range of 9-99%. 2) The average passage on the final test of knowledge was 84%, ranging from 22 to 99%. The average improvement in the results among the groups is 19%, ranging from 8 to 69%. Conclusion: Given the proportion of patients in the general population with pulmonary issues, there is a need for continuing education of nurses, as well as all professionals who take care of patients with chest drain.","PeriodicalId":76252,"journal":{"name":"Nurses Lamp","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurses Lamp","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Non-surgical departments have a growing need for the intervention of thoracic surgeons in resolving complications in patients with chest drain. Based on these data, there was a need for the formation of education of nurses about chest drainage. Objective was feedback on the effectiveness of nursing education. Aim: 1) To determine the initial level of knowledge about chest drainage of participants. 2) To determine the level of knowledge of participants after completing the course. Method: Data were collected from conducted courses in 2016 and 2017 year. The total number of participants was 417. The instrument used in the study was a questionnaire of knowledge designed to meet the needs of the research and evaluation of the course. The questionnaire contained 25 questions in seven thematic units. Results: 1) Average knowledge in the initial test was 65%, in the range of 9-99%. 2) The average passage on the final test of knowledge was 84%, ranging from 22 to 99%. The average improvement in the results among the groups is 19%, ranging from 8 to 69%. Conclusion: Given the proportion of patients in the general population with pulmonary issues, there is a need for continuing education of nurses, as well as all professionals who take care of patients with chest drain.
胸腔引流在临床实践中的应用——我们认为我们知道多少?
背景:非手术科室越来越需要胸外科医生介入治疗胸引流并发症。基于这些数据,有必要对护士进行胸腔引流的教育。目的对护理教育效果进行反馈。目的:1)确定参与者对胸腔引流术的初步认知水平。2)确定学员完成课程后的知识水平。方法:收集2016年和2017年开展的课程数据。参与者总数为417人。研究中使用的工具是一份知识问卷,旨在满足课程研究和评估的需要。调查表在七个主题单元中载有25个问题。结果:1)初始测试的平均知识水平为65%,在9-99%之间。2)期末知识测试的平均通过率为84%,从22%到99%不等。各组的平均改善率为19%,范围从8%到69%不等。结论:鉴于普通人群中肺部问题患者的比例,有必要对护士以及所有护理胸漏患者的专业人员进行继续教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信