S. Singh, P. Nath, Ayaskanta Singh, Jimmy Narayan, P. Parida, P. Padhi, G. Pati, Chudamani Meher, Omprakash Agrawal
{"title":"Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Alone Is a Better Predictor of MetabolicSyndrome and Insulin Resistance than Existing ATP-III Criteria","authors":"S. Singh, P. Nath, Ayaskanta Singh, Jimmy Narayan, P. Parida, P. Padhi, G. Pati, Chudamani Meher, Omprakash Agrawal","doi":"10.4172/2167-0943.1000183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nObjective: Metabolic syndrome (MS) also known as insulin resistance syndrome is a surrogate marker of insulin resistance (IR). Traditionally this is being diagnosed by Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP-III) and International Federation of Diabetes (IDF) criteria. Despite mounting evidence in favor of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), this has not been yet included as a component of either ATP-III or IDF criteria. We conducted this study to evaluate if NAFLD could be used as a criterion for identifying metabolic syndrome. \nMethods: Setting: Single center observational study in Gastroenterology OPD at SCB Medical College, Cuttack. Subjects: Consecutive subjects presenting with functional bowel disease were included; these included 68 NAFLD subjects and 200 subjects with normal liver on ultrasonography. Investigations: All 268 subjects were evaluated for the presence of metabolic syndrome by ATP-III and insulin resistance by HOMA IR method. NAFLD subjects were compared with those with metabolic syndrome for presence of insulin resistance \nResults: Patients with NAFLD had higher HOMA-IR than those with metabolic syndrome (2.34±1.01 vs. 1.79±1.01; p<0.000). Presence of NAFLD can detect insulin resistance with a sensitivity of 78.0% and specificity of 86.3 % with an odds ratio of 25.55 (95%CI: 11.51-56.70) which is better than that of metabolic syndrome diagnosed by ATP-III criteria (sensitivity 71.43%, specificity 70.32%; OR: 5.92, 95%CI: 2.99-11.74). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that fatty liver was an independent predictor for insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome. \nConclusion: NAFLD alone is a better predictor for insulin resistance than existing ATP-III criteria. Hence NAFLD should be used as a surrogate marker for metabolic syndrome.","PeriodicalId":16452,"journal":{"name":"Journal of metabolic syndrome","volume":"64 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of metabolic syndrome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0943.1000183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Abstract
Objective: Metabolic syndrome (MS) also known as insulin resistance syndrome is a surrogate marker of insulin resistance (IR). Traditionally this is being diagnosed by Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP-III) and International Federation of Diabetes (IDF) criteria. Despite mounting evidence in favor of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), this has not been yet included as a component of either ATP-III or IDF criteria. We conducted this study to evaluate if NAFLD could be used as a criterion for identifying metabolic syndrome.
Methods: Setting: Single center observational study in Gastroenterology OPD at SCB Medical College, Cuttack. Subjects: Consecutive subjects presenting with functional bowel disease were included; these included 68 NAFLD subjects and 200 subjects with normal liver on ultrasonography. Investigations: All 268 subjects were evaluated for the presence of metabolic syndrome by ATP-III and insulin resistance by HOMA IR method. NAFLD subjects were compared with those with metabolic syndrome for presence of insulin resistance
Results: Patients with NAFLD had higher HOMA-IR than those with metabolic syndrome (2.34±1.01 vs. 1.79±1.01; p<0.000). Presence of NAFLD can detect insulin resistance with a sensitivity of 78.0% and specificity of 86.3 % with an odds ratio of 25.55 (95%CI: 11.51-56.70) which is better than that of metabolic syndrome diagnosed by ATP-III criteria (sensitivity 71.43%, specificity 70.32%; OR: 5.92, 95%CI: 2.99-11.74). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that fatty liver was an independent predictor for insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome.
Conclusion: NAFLD alone is a better predictor for insulin resistance than existing ATP-III criteria. Hence NAFLD should be used as a surrogate marker for metabolic syndrome.