Developing a collaborative methodology for research with community groups

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
H. Gremillion
{"title":"Developing a collaborative methodology for research with community groups","authors":"H. Gremillion","doi":"10.1080/1177083X.2013.848215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This ‘short communication’ considers four different methodological approaches for ethnographic research projects that engage community groups when the research topic is contested amongst group members. I locate my comments in the context of a proposed project on concepts of gender in the ‘mythopoetic’ men's movement, and on feminist responses to these concepts; however, many of the points raised are applicable to a range of community projects. I discuss benefits and drawbacks of the following candidate methodologies: participant-observation (in this case, with a male partner researcher who is an ‘insider’); participatory-action research; reflexive ethnographic interviewing; and a collaborative documentary that incorporates aspects of video ethnography. A key consideration throughout is the positioning of the researcher and participants. I make a case for the uniquely collaborative potential of video when quite diverse perspectives are part and parcel of a proposed research agenda.","PeriodicalId":39455,"journal":{"name":"Kotuitui","volume":"6 1","pages":"74 - 78"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kotuitui","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2013.848215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This ‘short communication’ considers four different methodological approaches for ethnographic research projects that engage community groups when the research topic is contested amongst group members. I locate my comments in the context of a proposed project on concepts of gender in the ‘mythopoetic’ men's movement, and on feminist responses to these concepts; however, many of the points raised are applicable to a range of community projects. I discuss benefits and drawbacks of the following candidate methodologies: participant-observation (in this case, with a male partner researcher who is an ‘insider’); participatory-action research; reflexive ethnographic interviewing; and a collaborative documentary that incorporates aspects of video ethnography. A key consideration throughout is the positioning of the researcher and participants. I make a case for the uniquely collaborative potential of video when quite diverse perspectives are part and parcel of a proposed research agenda.
开发与社区团体合作的研究方法
这种“简短的交流”考虑了人种学研究项目的四种不同的方法方法,当研究主题在群体成员之间有争议时,这些方法可以吸引社区群体。我把我的评论定位在一个拟议项目的背景下,这个项目是关于“神话”男性运动中的性别概念,以及女权主义者对这些概念的反应;然而,提出的许多观点适用于一系列社区项目。我讨论了以下候选方法的优缺点:参与式观察(在这种情况下,与一位“内部人士”的男性研究员合作);participatory-action研究;反身性民族志访谈;还有一部合作纪录片,融合了视频人种学的各个方面。贯穿始终的一个关键考虑因素是研究人员和参与者的定位。当不同的视角成为拟议研究议程的重要组成部分时,我认为视频具有独特的协作潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kotuitui
Kotuitui Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Kotuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online is an international, open-access research journal published for social scientists in tertiary and research institutions and other organisations worldwide. The Maori name Kotuitui means interweaving and reflects the interdisciplinary nature of the journal. This open access, peer-reviewed journal encourages top-flight social science inquiry and research across all social science disciplines. It also recognises contributions made by the social science research community to other disciplines, including biological and physical sciences, and promotes connections between all research communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信