Status, problems and directions of improvement of pulmonological care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease according to the results of multicenter medical and sociological study

Q4 Medicine
О.А.Ризаханова, М.В.Авдеева, Л.Ю.Никитина, С.Н.Авдеев, O. Rizakhanova, M. Avdeeva, L. Nikitina, S. Avdeev
{"title":"Status, problems and directions of improvement of pulmonological care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease according to the results of multicenter medical and sociological study","authors":"О.А.Ризаханова, М.В.Авдеева, Л.Ю.Никитина, С.Н.Авдеев, O. Rizakhanova, M. Avdeeva, L. Nikitina, S. Avdeev","doi":"10.18093/0869-0189-2023-33-4-517-524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An expert analysis of existing organizational approaches at different levels of pulmonological medical care is needed to develop measures to improve pulmonological care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Aims: To conduct a multicenter medical and sociological study among pulmonologists to find priority areas and optimal ways to improve the organization of medical care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods. 181 pulmonologists from 23 regions of the Russian Federation were surveyed. Results. Pulmonologists believe that the actual prevalence (59.7%), disability rate (49.7%) and mortality rate (39.2%) associated with COPD are higher than official statistics in Russia. The most significant problems of the organization of pulmonological care are: defects in the organization of medical care at different levels, including insufficient quality of medical care (95.6%); lower quality of outpatient medical care compared to the inpatient care (p < 0.001); insufficient subsidized drug provision (69.6%); lack of dispensary follow-up (58.1%); insufficient rehabilitation measures (56.4%); diagnostic errors (53.4%); insufficient preventive measures (52.3%); long distance between specialized medical institution and the patient’s place of residence (41.4%); lack of continuum between the pre-hospital and hospital care (39.2%); lack of effective patient routing (37.1%); the high need of the regions in the medical and social programs to reduce morbidity and mortality from COPD (92.8%); insufficient contribution of the medical community to the adherence of COPD patients to prevention, treatment and rehabilitation; inadequate legal framework governing pulmonary care for COPD patients (29.3%). According to 97.7% of pulmonologists, COPD should be classified as a socially significant disease. This will allow for upscaling the programs aimed at prevention of COPD and reduction of the mortality rate and disability rate associated with COPD. Conclusion. The priority direction in the development of pulmonological care in Russia is improvement of regulatory and legal support with the development of more effective approaches to the provision of medical care to patients with COPD at all levels.","PeriodicalId":37383,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonologiya","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18093/0869-0189-2023-33-4-517-524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An expert analysis of existing organizational approaches at different levels of pulmonological medical care is needed to develop measures to improve pulmonological care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Aims: To conduct a multicenter medical and sociological study among pulmonologists to find priority areas and optimal ways to improve the organization of medical care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods. 181 pulmonologists from 23 regions of the Russian Federation were surveyed. Results. Pulmonologists believe that the actual prevalence (59.7%), disability rate (49.7%) and mortality rate (39.2%) associated with COPD are higher than official statistics in Russia. The most significant problems of the organization of pulmonological care are: defects in the organization of medical care at different levels, including insufficient quality of medical care (95.6%); lower quality of outpatient medical care compared to the inpatient care (p < 0.001); insufficient subsidized drug provision (69.6%); lack of dispensary follow-up (58.1%); insufficient rehabilitation measures (56.4%); diagnostic errors (53.4%); insufficient preventive measures (52.3%); long distance between specialized medical institution and the patient’s place of residence (41.4%); lack of continuum between the pre-hospital and hospital care (39.2%); lack of effective patient routing (37.1%); the high need of the regions in the medical and social programs to reduce morbidity and mortality from COPD (92.8%); insufficient contribution of the medical community to the adherence of COPD patients to prevention, treatment and rehabilitation; inadequate legal framework governing pulmonary care for COPD patients (29.3%). According to 97.7% of pulmonologists, COPD should be classified as a socially significant disease. This will allow for upscaling the programs aimed at prevention of COPD and reduction of the mortality rate and disability rate associated with COPD. Conclusion. The priority direction in the development of pulmonological care in Russia is improvement of regulatory and legal support with the development of more effective approaches to the provision of medical care to patients with COPD at all levels.
根据多中心医学和社会学研究结果探讨慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺部护理的现状、问题及改善方向
需要对不同级别的肺部医学护理的现有组织方法进行专家分析,以制定改善慢性阻塞性肺病患者肺部护理的措施。目的:在肺科医师中开展一项多中心医学和社会学研究,以寻找改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者医疗保健组织的优先领域和最佳途径。方法:对来自俄罗斯联邦23个地区的181名肺科医生进行调查。结果。肺病学家认为,与COPD相关的实际患病率(59.7%)、致残率(49.7%)和死亡率(39.2%)高于俄罗斯的官方统计数据。肺科护理组织中最显著的问题是:各级医疗服务组织存在缺陷,包括医疗服务质量不足(95.6%);门诊医疗服务质量低于住院医疗服务质量(p < 0.001);药品补贴不足(69.6%);缺少药房随访(58.1%);康复措施不足(56.4%);诊断错误(53.4%);预防措施不足(52.3%);专科医疗机构与患者居住地距离较远(41.4%);院前和住院护理之间缺乏连续性(39.2%);缺乏有效的患者路径(37.1%);各地区在降低慢性阻塞性肺病发病率和死亡率的医疗和社会项目方面的高度需求(92.8%);医学界对COPD患者坚持预防、治疗和康复的贡献不足;管理COPD患者肺部护理的法律框架不足(29.3%)。97.7%的肺科医生认为,慢性阻塞性肺病应被归类为具有社会意义的疾病。这将有助于扩大旨在预防慢性阻塞性肺病的项目,并降低与慢性阻塞性肺病相关的死亡率和致残率。结论。俄罗斯肺病护理发展的优先方向是改进监管和法律支持,制定更有效的办法,向各级COPD患者提供医疗服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pulmonologiya
Pulmonologiya Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The aim of this journal is to state a scientific position of the Russian Respiratory Society (RRS) on diagnosis and treatment of respiratory diseases based on recent evidence-based clinical trial publications and international consensuses. The most important tasks of the journal are: -improvement proficiency qualifications of respiratory specialists; -education in pulmonology; -prompt publication of original studies on diagnosis and treatment of respiratory diseases; -sharing clinical experience and information about pulmonology service organization in different regions of Russia; -information on current protocols, standards and recommendations of international respiratory societies; -discussion and consequent publication Russian consensus documents and announcement of RRS activities; -publication and comments of regulatory documents of Russian Ministry of Health; -historical review of Russian pulmonology development. The scientific concept of the journal includes publication of current evidence-based studies on respiratory medicine and their discussion with the participation of Russian and foreign experts and development of national consensus documents on respiratory medicine. Russian and foreign respiratory specialists including pneumologists, TB specialists, thoracic surgeons, allergists, clinical immunologists, pediatricians, oncologists, physiologists, and therapeutists are invited to publish article in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信