Comparison of old and new types of premedications.

J. Kanto, A. Pakkanen, L. Kangas, T. Leppänen
{"title":"Comparison of old and new types of premedications.","authors":"J. Kanto, A. Pakkanen, L. Kangas, T. Leppänen","doi":"10.1097/00132586-198304000-00055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By random allocation 41 patients received 1 mg flunitrazepam orally the night before operation and 1 mg on the morning of operation (group 1), and another 41 received 100 mg pentobarbital orally the night before operation, followed by intramuscular scopolamine (0.006 mg/kg) + morphine (0.02 mg/kg) on the morning of operation (group 2). All patients received 0.5 mg atropine intravenously just before the induction of anesthesia. The patients in group 2 were better sedated and had less salivary secretion than those in group 1, but otherwise both were comparable. In group 2 the induction requirements of thiopentone were significantly decreased in comparison with group 1, again indicating a more potent sedative effect. Because even in the total scoring of the results there was no significant difference between the two groups, the easy oral route of administration of flunitrazepam offers a clinically relevant alternative to the conventional premedication. In some of these E.N.T. patients who received flunitrazepam, intravenous atropine given just before the induction of anesthesia was unable to prevent salivary secretion. Oral benzodiazepine derivatives (flunitrazepam) appear to be useful before surgery as the old type of premedication (oral pentobarbital + i.m. scopolamine and morphine).","PeriodicalId":13897,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy and toxicology","volume":"121 1","pages":"187-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy and toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00132586-198304000-00055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

By random allocation 41 patients received 1 mg flunitrazepam orally the night before operation and 1 mg on the morning of operation (group 1), and another 41 received 100 mg pentobarbital orally the night before operation, followed by intramuscular scopolamine (0.006 mg/kg) + morphine (0.02 mg/kg) on the morning of operation (group 2). All patients received 0.5 mg atropine intravenously just before the induction of anesthesia. The patients in group 2 were better sedated and had less salivary secretion than those in group 1, but otherwise both were comparable. In group 2 the induction requirements of thiopentone were significantly decreased in comparison with group 1, again indicating a more potent sedative effect. Because even in the total scoring of the results there was no significant difference between the two groups, the easy oral route of administration of flunitrazepam offers a clinically relevant alternative to the conventional premedication. In some of these E.N.T. patients who received flunitrazepam, intravenous atropine given just before the induction of anesthesia was unable to prevent salivary secretion. Oral benzodiazepine derivatives (flunitrazepam) appear to be useful before surgery as the old type of premedication (oral pentobarbital + i.m. scopolamine and morphine).
新旧预用药的比较。
随机分配41例患者术前晚口服氟硝西泮1 mg,术后晨口服1 mg(组1),术前晚口服戊巴比妥100 mg,术后晨肌注东莨菪碱(0.006 mg/kg) +吗啡(0.02 mg/kg)(组2)。所有患者在麻醉诱导前静脉滴注阿托品0.5 mg。2组患者镇静效果较好,唾液分泌量较1组少,但其他方面具有可比性。与第1组相比,第2组硫喷妥酮的诱导需要量显著降低,再次表明其镇静作用更强。因为即使在结果的总评分上,两组之间也没有显著差异,所以口服氟硝西泮的简便途径为传统的预用药提供了一种临床相关的替代方案。在一些接受氟硝西泮的耳鼻喉科患者中,在麻醉诱导前静脉给予阿托品无法阻止唾液分泌。口服苯二氮卓衍生物(氟硝西泮)作为术前治疗的旧方法(口服戊巴比妥+东莨菪碱和吗啡)似乎是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信