On the Subjective Assessment of the Perceived Quality of Medical Images and Videos

Lucie Lévêque, Hantao Liu, Sabina Baraković, J. Barakovic, M. Martini, M. Outtas, Lu Zhang, A. Kumcu, L. Platisa, Rafael Rodrigues, António M. G. Pinheiro, A. Skodras
{"title":"On the Subjective Assessment of the Perceived Quality of Medical Images and Videos","authors":"Lucie Lévêque, Hantao Liu, Sabina Baraković, J. Barakovic, M. Martini, M. Outtas, Lu Zhang, A. Kumcu, L. Platisa, Rafael Rodrigues, António M. G. Pinheiro, A. Skodras","doi":"10.1109/QoMEX.2018.8463297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Medical professionals are viewing an increasing number of images and videos in their clinical routine. However, various types of distortions can affect medical imaging data, and therefore impact the viewers' experienced quality and their clinical practice. Thus it is necessary to quantify this impact and understand how the viewers, i.e., medical experts, perceive the quality of (distorted) images and videos. In this paper, we present an up-to-date review of the methodologies used in the literature for the subjective quality assessment of medical images and videos and discuss their merits and drawbacks depending on the use case.","PeriodicalId":6618,"journal":{"name":"2018 Tenth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)","volume":"60 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Tenth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2018.8463297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Medical professionals are viewing an increasing number of images and videos in their clinical routine. However, various types of distortions can affect medical imaging data, and therefore impact the viewers' experienced quality and their clinical practice. Thus it is necessary to quantify this impact and understand how the viewers, i.e., medical experts, perceive the quality of (distorted) images and videos. In this paper, we present an up-to-date review of the methodologies used in the literature for the subjective quality assessment of medical images and videos and discuss their merits and drawbacks depending on the use case.
医学图像和视频感知质量的主观评价
医学专业人员在他们的临床常规中正在观看越来越多的图像和视频。然而,各种类型的畸变会影响医学成像数据,从而影响观看者的体验质量和临床实践。因此,有必要量化这种影响,并了解观众,即医学专家如何看待(扭曲的)图像和视频的质量。在本文中,我们提出了在医学图像和视频的主观质量评估的文献中使用的方法的最新审查,并讨论其优点和缺点取决于用例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信