Ullman’s experiential dreamwork group approach versus Islamic dream interpretation: the dream of a psychologist Muslim women

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
M. Campo-Redondo, Mai Nasser Ali Azayez Alsheraifi, M. Alshamsi
{"title":"Ullman’s experiential dreamwork group approach versus Islamic dream interpretation: the dream of a psychologist Muslim women","authors":"M. Campo-Redondo, Mai Nasser Ali Azayez Alsheraifi, M. Alshamsi","doi":"10.1080/14753634.2023.2207446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to draw attention to, and exemplify, how a dialogue between the Islamic vision of dreams could be compared with those premises proposed by Montague Ullman. Specifically, we are interested in unveiling the application of the Ullman’s Experiential Dreamwork Group Approach and intertwining it with the Islamic understanding of dreams in Muslim women. To do so, we first review the premises of psychodynamic theory and relate them to the Ullman method. Second, we deploy ideas of dream interpretation in Islam. Thirdly, the mental health of Muslim women in Middle Eastern culture is discussed. We then present an in-depth autoethnographic documentation of the dream of a Muslim woman who is in the final phase of her academic training as a clinical psychologist in a Middle Eastern country, and who received intensive training in the Ullman’s approach. We intend to show the overlaps, and some-times conflicts, of the two epistemologies, Western (Ullman) and Eastern (Islamic), in understanding and treating dreams. At the end of the article, conclusions are derived and implications for future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":43801,"journal":{"name":"Psychodynamic Practice","volume":"20 1","pages":"397 - 415"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychodynamic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14753634.2023.2207446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to draw attention to, and exemplify, how a dialogue between the Islamic vision of dreams could be compared with those premises proposed by Montague Ullman. Specifically, we are interested in unveiling the application of the Ullman’s Experiential Dreamwork Group Approach and intertwining it with the Islamic understanding of dreams in Muslim women. To do so, we first review the premises of psychodynamic theory and relate them to the Ullman method. Second, we deploy ideas of dream interpretation in Islam. Thirdly, the mental health of Muslim women in Middle Eastern culture is discussed. We then present an in-depth autoethnographic documentation of the dream of a Muslim woman who is in the final phase of her academic training as a clinical psychologist in a Middle Eastern country, and who received intensive training in the Ullman’s approach. We intend to show the overlaps, and some-times conflicts, of the two epistemologies, Western (Ullman) and Eastern (Islamic), in understanding and treating dreams. At the end of the article, conclusions are derived and implications for future research are discussed.
乌尔曼的体验式梦境小组方法与伊斯兰梦的解释:一位穆斯林女性心理学家的梦
这篇文章的目的是引起人们的注意,并举例说明,如何将伊斯兰梦的愿景与蒙塔古·乌尔曼提出的前提进行比较。具体来说,我们感兴趣的是揭示Ullman 's experience Dreamwork Group Approach的应用,并将其与伊斯兰教对穆斯林女性梦境的理解交织在一起。为此,我们首先回顾心理动力学理论的前提,并将它们与乌尔曼方法联系起来。其次,我们运用伊斯兰教的释梦思想。第三,探讨了中东文化背景下穆斯林妇女的心理健康状况。然后,我们对一位穆斯林妇女的梦进行了深入的自我民族志记录。这位妇女在中东国家作为临床心理学家,正处于学术培训的最后阶段,她接受了乌尔曼方法的强化培训。我们打算展示西方(乌尔曼)和东方(伊斯兰)两种认识论在理解和对待梦方面的重叠,有时是冲突。在文章的最后,本文得出了结论,并对未来的研究进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychodynamic Practice
Psychodynamic Practice PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Psychodynamic Practice is a journal of counselling, psychotherapy and consultancy and it is written for professionals in all fields who use psychodynamic thinking in their work. The journal explores the relevance of psychodynamic ideas to different occupational settings. It emphasizes setting and application as well as theory and technique and focuses on four broad areas: •Clinical practice •The understanding of group and organisational processes •The use of psychodynamic ideas and methods in different occupational settings (for example, education and training, health care, social work, pastoral care, management and consultancy) •The understanding of social, political and cultural issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信