Anthropological Aesthetics of Greek Antiquity as a Narrative of Philosophical Discourse

IF 0.5 0 PHILOSOPHY
O. Goncharova
{"title":"Anthropological Aesthetics of Greek Antiquity as a Narrative of Philosophical Discourse","authors":"O. Goncharova","doi":"10.15802/ampr.v0i21.260340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. The article aims to define the philosophical narratives about the \"beautiful human\" of Greek antiquity in the coordinates of the triad of \"natural\", \"social\" and \"cultural\" body. Theoretical basis. When achieving this purpose, the author based on the conceptual provisions of the philosophical anthropology of Н. Plessner, in particular, concerning the attitude of a limited body to its limit as an empirical comprehension of a human him/herself and the world. Developing the position of the body as a socio-cultural phenomenon and proceeding from the definition of corporeality as a \"transformed human body under the influence of social and cultural factors, which has socio-cultural meanings and performs certain socio-cultural functions\" (I. Bykhovskaya) (transl. by O. G.), the triad of \"natural\", \"social\" and \"cultural\" body was used as a methodological basis to analyse the research object. Originality lies in the explication of the peculiarities of aesthetic and anthropological discourse in Ancient Greek philosophy, not only through the prism of the dichotomy of \"soul\" and \"body\", but also through the prism of the triad \"natural\", \"social\" and \"cultural\" body, allowing rethinking of the narratives concerning the \"beautiful human\" of the formation period of the European anthropological aesthetics in Antiquity. Conclusions. The anthropological aesthetics of Greek Antiquity is masculine aesthetics, the aesthetics of the male \"cultural body\". If a man is an epistemological subject, he is able, despite the ugliness and abomination of his natural body, to reach the level of the cultural body, the level of \"personal existence of corporeality\". As for the female corporeality, since the Ancient Greek philosophy does not provide the status of an epistemological subject for a woman, she remains at the level of \"social body\".","PeriodicalId":42650,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i21.260340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. The article aims to define the philosophical narratives about the "beautiful human" of Greek antiquity in the coordinates of the triad of "natural", "social" and "cultural" body. Theoretical basis. When achieving this purpose, the author based on the conceptual provisions of the philosophical anthropology of Н. Plessner, in particular, concerning the attitude of a limited body to its limit as an empirical comprehension of a human him/herself and the world. Developing the position of the body as a socio-cultural phenomenon and proceeding from the definition of corporeality as a "transformed human body under the influence of social and cultural factors, which has socio-cultural meanings and performs certain socio-cultural functions" (I. Bykhovskaya) (transl. by O. G.), the triad of "natural", "social" and "cultural" body was used as a methodological basis to analyse the research object. Originality lies in the explication of the peculiarities of aesthetic and anthropological discourse in Ancient Greek philosophy, not only through the prism of the dichotomy of "soul" and "body", but also through the prism of the triad "natural", "social" and "cultural" body, allowing rethinking of the narratives concerning the "beautiful human" of the formation period of the European anthropological aesthetics in Antiquity. Conclusions. The anthropological aesthetics of Greek Antiquity is masculine aesthetics, the aesthetics of the male "cultural body". If a man is an epistemological subject, he is able, despite the ugliness and abomination of his natural body, to reach the level of the cultural body, the level of "personal existence of corporeality". As for the female corporeality, since the Ancient Greek philosophy does not provide the status of an epistemological subject for a woman, she remains at the level of "social body".
作为哲学话语叙事的古希腊人类学美学
目的。本文旨在以“自然”、“社会”、“文化”身体三位一体的坐标来界定希腊古代关于“美丽人类”的哲学叙事。理论基础。在达到这一目的时,笔者借鉴了Н哲学人类学的概念规定。尤其是普勒斯纳(Plessner),他将有限的身体对其极限的态度作为对人类自身和世界的经验理解。发展身体作为一种社会文化现象的地位,并从肉体的定义出发,将其定义为“在社会和文化因素的影响下被改造的人体,具有社会文化意义并执行某些社会文化功能”(I. Bykhovskaya)。由o.g.),“自然”,“社会”和“文化”身体的三位一体被用作分析研究对象的方法论基础。其独创性在于,不仅通过“灵魂”和“身体”二分法的棱镜,而且通过“自然”、“社会”和“文化”身体三位一体的棱镜,阐释了古希腊哲学中美学和人类学话语的特殊性,从而重新思考了欧洲古代人类学美学形成时期关于“美丽人类”的叙事。结论。古希腊的人类学美学是男性美学,是男性“文化体”的美学。如果一个人是一个认识论的主体,尽管他的自然身体丑陋可憎,但他能够达到文化身体的水平,即“肉体的个人存在”的水平。对于女性的肉体,由于古希腊哲学没有为女性提供认识论主体的地位,所以女性仍然停留在“社会体”的层面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信