S. Araya, Jeffrey P. Mitchell, J. Hopmans, T. Ghezzehei
{"title":"Long-term impact of cover crop and reduced disturbance tillage on soil pore size distribution and soil water storage","authors":"S. Araya, Jeffrey P. Mitchell, J. Hopmans, T. Ghezzehei","doi":"10.5194/soil-8-177-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. We studied the long-term impact of contrasting tillage\nand cover cropping systems on soil structure and hydraulic properties.\nComplete water retention and conductivity curves for the top (0–5 cm) and\nsubsurface (20–25 cm) soils were characterized and contrasted. Dynamic\nwater storage and retention were evaluated using numerical simulations in\nHYDRUS-2D software. Compared with standard-till (ST) and no-cover-crop (NO)\nsystems, soils under no-till (NT) and cover cropping (CC) systems showed\nimproved soil structure in terms of pore size distribution (PSD). Changes in\nhydraulic conductivity (K) under these systems led to an increased infiltration\nrate and water retention. However, NT and CC plots had lower water content\nat field capacity (33 kPa suction) and lower plant-available water (PAW)\ncompared with ST and NO plots. Numerical simulations, however, showed that NT\nand CC plots have higher water storage (albeit marginal in magnitude) and\nwater availability following irrigation. Because the numerical simulations\nconsidered retention and conductivity functions simultaneously and\ndynamically through time, they allow the capture of hydraulic states that\nare arguably more relevant to crops. The study concludes that the long-term\npractices of NT and CC systems were beneficial in terms of changes to the\nPSD. NT and CC systems also marginally improved soil water\nconductivity and storage at the plot scale.\n","PeriodicalId":22015,"journal":{"name":"Soil Science","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-177-2022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
Abstract. We studied the long-term impact of contrasting tillage
and cover cropping systems on soil structure and hydraulic properties.
Complete water retention and conductivity curves for the top (0–5 cm) and
subsurface (20–25 cm) soils were characterized and contrasted. Dynamic
water storage and retention were evaluated using numerical simulations in
HYDRUS-2D software. Compared with standard-till (ST) and no-cover-crop (NO)
systems, soils under no-till (NT) and cover cropping (CC) systems showed
improved soil structure in terms of pore size distribution (PSD). Changes in
hydraulic conductivity (K) under these systems led to an increased infiltration
rate and water retention. However, NT and CC plots had lower water content
at field capacity (33 kPa suction) and lower plant-available water (PAW)
compared with ST and NO plots. Numerical simulations, however, showed that NT
and CC plots have higher water storage (albeit marginal in magnitude) and
water availability following irrigation. Because the numerical simulations
considered retention and conductivity functions simultaneously and
dynamically through time, they allow the capture of hydraulic states that
are arguably more relevant to crops. The study concludes that the long-term
practices of NT and CC systems were beneficial in terms of changes to the
PSD. NT and CC systems also marginally improved soil water
conductivity and storage at the plot scale.
期刊介绍:
Cessation.Soil Science satisfies the professional needs of all scientists and laboratory personnel involved in soil and plant research by publishing primary research reports and critical reviews of basic and applied soil science, especially as it relates to soil and plant studies and general environmental soil science.
Each month, Soil Science presents authoritative research articles from an impressive array of discipline: soil chemistry and biochemistry, physics, fertility and nutrition, soil genesis and morphology, soil microbiology and mineralogy. Of immediate relevance to soil scientists-both industrial and academic-this unique publication also has long-range value for agronomists and environmental scientists.