Experimental comparison of sonoporation and electroporation in cell transfection applications

J. Pepe, M. Rincón, Junru Wu
{"title":"Experimental comparison of sonoporation and electroporation in cell transfection applications","authors":"J. Pepe, M. Rincón, Junru Wu","doi":"10.1121/1.1652111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An experimental study has been performed for cell suspensions to compare efficiency of cell transfection. It was demonstrated that electroporation was superior to sonoporation in terms of viability (65.8±2.3% vs 50.8±4.15%) and transfection efficiency (15.83±3.5% vs 7.53±0.4%) for Jurkat lymphocytes (nonprimary cells), and sonoporation was better in terms of viability (64.8±1.51% vs 53.7±1.53%) and transfection efficiency (2.73±0.21% vs 0.43±0.06%) for human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (primary cells). The electroporation was performed using a Gene Pulser® II Apparatus with voltage of 250 V, and the sonoporation was achieved using 2-MHz pulsed ultrasound exposure (ISPPA=80 W/cm2) assisted with encapsulated bubbles (Optison®).","PeriodicalId":87384,"journal":{"name":"Acoustics research letters online : ARLO","volume":"33 1","pages":"62-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acoustics research letters online : ARLO","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1652111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

An experimental study has been performed for cell suspensions to compare efficiency of cell transfection. It was demonstrated that electroporation was superior to sonoporation in terms of viability (65.8±2.3% vs 50.8±4.15%) and transfection efficiency (15.83±3.5% vs 7.53±0.4%) for Jurkat lymphocytes (nonprimary cells), and sonoporation was better in terms of viability (64.8±1.51% vs 53.7±1.53%) and transfection efficiency (2.73±0.21% vs 0.43±0.06%) for human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (primary cells). The electroporation was performed using a Gene Pulser® II Apparatus with voltage of 250 V, and the sonoporation was achieved using 2-MHz pulsed ultrasound exposure (ISPPA=80 W/cm2) assisted with encapsulated bubbles (Optison®).
超声穿孔和电穿孔在细胞转染中的实验比较
对细胞悬浮液进行了实验研究,以比较细胞转染的效率。结果表明,电穿孔法对Jurkat淋巴细胞(非原代细胞)的存活率(65.8±2.3%比50.8±4.15%)和转染效率(15.83±3.5%比7.53±0.4%)优于声穿孔法,对人外周血单个核细胞(原代细胞)的存活率(64.8±1.51%比53.7±1.53%)和转染效率(2.73±0.21%比0.43±0.06%)优于声穿孔法。电穿孔使用电压为250 V的Gene Pulser®II仪器进行,超声穿孔使用2 mhz脉冲超声暴露(ISPPA=80 W/cm2)辅助封装气泡(Optison®)实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信