Effects of N ‐methyl‐ d ‐aspartate agonists and antagonists in rats discriminating amphetamine

M. Gaiardi, C. Gubellini, R. Dall'olio, O. Gandolfi, M. Bartoletti
{"title":"Effects of N ‐methyl‐ d ‐aspartate agonists and antagonists in rats discriminating amphetamine","authors":"M. Gaiardi, C. Gubellini, R. Dall'olio, O. Gandolfi, M. Bartoletti","doi":"10.1097/00008877-200109000-00002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study assessed the interactions between N ‐methyl‐ d ‐aspartate (NMDA) agonists or antagonists and the discriminative stimulus effects of amphetamine. Adult male Sprague–Dawley rats were trained to discriminate 0.5 mg/kg (i.p.) of amphetamine from saline under a two‐lever fixed‐ratio schedule of food reinforcement. During test sessions, i.p. injections of the glycine site agonist d ‐cycloserine, the ion‐channel blocker dizocilpine and the competitive antagonist CGP 43487 were coadministered with i.p. saline or with a full range of doses of amphetamine. d ‐Cycloserine did not substitute for amphetamine and attenuated the cueing effects of the drug. Both dizocilpine and CGP 43487 engendered intermediate levels of amphetamine‐appropriate responses and potentiated the stimulus properties of amphetamine; however, the effects of CGP 43487 were very small and not dose‐dependent. In an ancillary experiment, the training dose of amphetamine was reduced to 0.25 mg/kg; under these conditions dizocilpine, but not CGP 43487, produced full substitution for the discriminative stimulus effects of amphetamine. These results show that drugs affecting NMDA receptor‐based neurotransmission can modulate the discriminative stimulus effects of amphetamine.","PeriodicalId":8741,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Pharmacology","volume":"57 1","pages":"317-324"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00008877-200109000-00002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The present study assessed the interactions between N ‐methyl‐ d ‐aspartate (NMDA) agonists or antagonists and the discriminative stimulus effects of amphetamine. Adult male Sprague–Dawley rats were trained to discriminate 0.5 mg/kg (i.p.) of amphetamine from saline under a two‐lever fixed‐ratio schedule of food reinforcement. During test sessions, i.p. injections of the glycine site agonist d ‐cycloserine, the ion‐channel blocker dizocilpine and the competitive antagonist CGP 43487 were coadministered with i.p. saline or with a full range of doses of amphetamine. d ‐Cycloserine did not substitute for amphetamine and attenuated the cueing effects of the drug. Both dizocilpine and CGP 43487 engendered intermediate levels of amphetamine‐appropriate responses and potentiated the stimulus properties of amphetamine; however, the effects of CGP 43487 were very small and not dose‐dependent. In an ancillary experiment, the training dose of amphetamine was reduced to 0.25 mg/kg; under these conditions dizocilpine, but not CGP 43487, produced full substitution for the discriminative stimulus effects of amphetamine. These results show that drugs affecting NMDA receptor‐based neurotransmission can modulate the discriminative stimulus effects of amphetamine.
N -甲基- d -天冬氨酸激动剂和拮抗剂对大鼠鉴别安非他明的影响
本研究评估了N -甲基- d -天冬氨酸(NMDA)激动剂或拮抗剂与安非他明的鉴别刺激作用之间的相互作用。成年雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠被训练在两级固定比例的食物强化计划下区分0.5 mg/kg (i.p.)的安非他明和生理盐水。在试验过程中,甘氨酸受体激动剂d -环丝氨酸、离子通道阻滞剂二唑西平和竞争拮抗剂CGP 43487与生理盐水或全剂量的安非他明共注射。d‐环丝氨酸不能替代安非他明,并能减弱药物的提示作用。二唑西平和CGP 43487均产生中等水平的安非他明适宜反应,并增强安非他明的刺激特性;然而,CGP 43487的作用非常小,而且不依赖于剂量。在辅助实验中,安非他明的训练剂量降至0.25 mg/kg;在这些条件下,二唑西平,而不是CGP 43487,产生了完全替代安非他明的区别刺激作用。这些结果表明,影响NMDA受体神经传递的药物可以调节安非他明的鉴别刺激作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信