La apropiación paisajística del territorio: una disputa epistemológica

IF 0.3 0 PHILOSOPHY
F. Covarrubias, María Guadalupe Alpuche Cruz
{"title":"La apropiación paisajística del territorio: una disputa epistemológica","authors":"F. Covarrubias, María Guadalupe Alpuche Cruz","doi":"10.4067/S0717-554X2019000100082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolResumen: El objetivo de la investigacion es describir las diferentes maneras de concebir el paisaje. Para ello, fueron analizadas, fichadas y discutidas multiples fuentes de informacion, seleccionandose los planteamientos mas expresivos de la racionalidad teorica desde la cual el paisaje es concebido. Se encontro que, habiendo nacido el paisaje de la pintura de la Edad Media, hoy dia es estudiado como representacion artistica por la estetica, como geosistema por la geografia, como ecosistema por la ecologia y como apropiacion subjetiva del territorio por la sociologia, la antropologia y la semiotica. Pero la experiencia paisajistica contemplativa realizada predominantemente bajo formas esteticas no es una perspectiva suficientemente atendida a pesar de que, junto con la representacion artistica del paisaje, constituye la perspectiva mas fidedigna del concepto de paisaje. EnglishAbstract: The objective is to describe different landscape approaches. To carry this out, multiple information sources were analysed, recorded and discussed, selecting the most expressive approaches of the theoretical rationality from which the landscape is conceived. It was found that having the painting landscape born in the Middle Ages, it is studied today by aesthetics as an artistic representation, as a geosystem by geography, as an ecosystem by ecology and as a subjective appropriation of the territory by sociology, anthropology and semiotics. However, the contemplative landscape experience was predominantly carried out under aesthetic form, but it is not a perspective sufficiently attended. Alongside with the artistic representation of the landscape, constitutes the most reliable perspective of the landscape concept.","PeriodicalId":54112,"journal":{"name":"Cinta de Moebio","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cinta de Moebio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2019000100082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

espanolResumen: El objetivo de la investigacion es describir las diferentes maneras de concebir el paisaje. Para ello, fueron analizadas, fichadas y discutidas multiples fuentes de informacion, seleccionandose los planteamientos mas expresivos de la racionalidad teorica desde la cual el paisaje es concebido. Se encontro que, habiendo nacido el paisaje de la pintura de la Edad Media, hoy dia es estudiado como representacion artistica por la estetica, como geosistema por la geografia, como ecosistema por la ecologia y como apropiacion subjetiva del territorio por la sociologia, la antropologia y la semiotica. Pero la experiencia paisajistica contemplativa realizada predominantemente bajo formas esteticas no es una perspectiva suficientemente atendida a pesar de que, junto con la representacion artistica del paisaje, constituye la perspectiva mas fidedigna del concepto de paisaje. EnglishAbstract: The objective is to describe different landscape approaches. To carry this out, multiple information sources were analysed, recorded and discussed, selecting the most expressive approaches of the theoretical rationality from which the landscape is conceived. It was found that having the painting landscape born in the Middle Ages, it is studied today by aesthetics as an artistic representation, as a geosystem by geography, as an ecosystem by ecology and as a subjective appropriation of the territory by sociology, anthropology and semiotics. However, the contemplative landscape experience was predominantly carried out under aesthetic form, but it is not a perspective sufficiently attended. Alongside with the artistic representation of the landscape, constitutes the most reliable perspective of the landscape concept.
领土的景观占用:认识论上的争论
摘要:本研究的目的是描述景观概念的不同方式。为了实现这一目标,本文对景观的概念进行了分析、记录和讨论,并选择了最具代表性的理论理性方法。我发现,在中世纪绘画中诞生的风景,如今被美学研究为艺术表现,被地理学研究为地质系统,被生态学研究为生态系统,被社会学、人类学和符号学研究为领土的主观占有。然而,主要以审美形式进行的沉思景观体验并不是一个得到充分关注的视角,尽管它与景观的艺术表现一起构成了景观概念最可靠的视角。英文说明:目的是描述不同的景观方法。为了实现这一点,对多种信息来源进行了分析、记录和讨论,选择了构想景观的理论理性的最具表达性的方法。It was found that不由画状况born in the Middle Ages, It is studied today by aesthetics as an艺术representation, geosystem by地理,as an生态系统生态学和主观appropriation of the territory by sociology, anthropology and semiotics。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查,这个县的面积为,其中土地面积为,其中土地面积为。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查,这个县的总面积为,其中土地和(0.984平方公里)水。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cinta de Moebio
Cinta de Moebio PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Cinta de Moebio publishes scientific articles and essays on epistemology of social science. The editorial experience of the magazine indicates that some academics send articles of philosophy, but of issues that are not related to the social sciences, as well as academics who sent the results of their research or projects in the social sciences, but its focus is not epistemology, which also are geared out to the purpose of the journal. The journal, put it in some way, it is in the dialogue of philosophy with social science and, therefore, both domains must be present in the articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信