How to improve students’ experience in blending learning? Evidence from the perceptions of students in a Postgraduate Master’s Degree

IF 1.4 Q3 BUSINESS
Beatriz Garcia-Ortega, Javier Galan-Cubillo
{"title":"How to improve students’ experience in blending learning? Evidence from the perceptions of students in a Postgraduate Master’s Degree","authors":"Beatriz Garcia-Ortega, Javier Galan-Cubillo","doi":"10.4995/WPOM.15677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the perceptions of a group of students of a Postgraduate Master’s Degree in Cosmetics Industry at the Universitat de València, delivered with a blended learning modality, in relation to their experience in face-to-face learning and differentiating between those with or without a previous background in a remote online learning environment, with the added purpose of identifying strategies to enhance that experience, while offering further evidence for scholars, educators and institutions in this field. To this end, a survey with open questions devised ad hoc leaning on our literature review was submitted to a group of 114 students of the Master’s Degree in the period 2017-2020. Students were enquired about the pros and cons of their blended learning experience in relation to the traditional face-to-face learning, and which modality they would choose next time if both were offered, only considering the achievement, experience and satisfaction, regardless of the price. 77 students of our initial sample participated in the questionnaire, 38 of them without previous experience in blended or distance learning. The results show a certain predilection for face-to-face learning, especially in the group of newbies in blended or distance learning. They highlight how they miss a closer interaction with their peers and professors and the difficulties to assimilate certain content, while appraising the flexibility, autonomy, and the self-pace of the blended learning modality. Correspondingly, students with experience in remote online education settings generally show a better predisposal and find fewer disadvantages in blended learning. This suggests that the factor of experience and adaptation to new tools and methods improves student perception and confidence and shapes their preferences, with a foreseeable growing acceptance of blended learning in the future. Finally, the outcome allows us to define a series of strategies to improve the achievement, experience, and satisfaction of students in this learning context.","PeriodicalId":42114,"journal":{"name":"WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management","volume":"405 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4995/WPOM.15677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the perceptions of a group of students of a Postgraduate Master’s Degree in Cosmetics Industry at the Universitat de València, delivered with a blended learning modality, in relation to their experience in face-to-face learning and differentiating between those with or without a previous background in a remote online learning environment, with the added purpose of identifying strategies to enhance that experience, while offering further evidence for scholars, educators and institutions in this field. To this end, a survey with open questions devised ad hoc leaning on our literature review was submitted to a group of 114 students of the Master’s Degree in the period 2017-2020. Students were enquired about the pros and cons of their blended learning experience in relation to the traditional face-to-face learning, and which modality they would choose next time if both were offered, only considering the achievement, experience and satisfaction, regardless of the price. 77 students of our initial sample participated in the questionnaire, 38 of them without previous experience in blended or distance learning. The results show a certain predilection for face-to-face learning, especially in the group of newbies in blended or distance learning. They highlight how they miss a closer interaction with their peers and professors and the difficulties to assimilate certain content, while appraising the flexibility, autonomy, and the self-pace of the blended learning modality. Correspondingly, students with experience in remote online education settings generally show a better predisposal and find fewer disadvantages in blended learning. This suggests that the factor of experience and adaptation to new tools and methods improves student perception and confidence and shapes their preferences, with a foreseeable growing acceptance of blended learning in the future. Finally, the outcome allows us to define a series of strategies to improve the achievement, experience, and satisfaction of students in this learning context.
如何提高学生在融合学习中的体验?来自研究生硕士学位学生认知的证据
本文考察了一组在valnncia大学攻读化妆品行业硕士研究生学位的学生的看法,采用混合学习模式,与他们面对面学习的经历和在远程在线学习环境中区分有或没有以前背景的人的经历有关,目的是确定增强这种经历的策略,同时为学者提供进一步的证据。这个领域的教育工作者和机构。为此,在我们的文献综述的基础上,我们向114名2017-2020年的硕士生提交了一份带有开放式问题的调查问卷。学生被问及他们的混合学习体验与传统面对面学习相比的利弊,以及如果下次同时提供两种学习方式,他们会选择哪种方式,只考虑成绩、经验和满意度,而不考虑价格。我们最初抽样的77名学生参加了问卷调查,其中38人以前没有混合式或远程学习的经验。结果表明,在混合式或远程学习中,新手群体对面对面学习有一定的偏好。他们强调,在评价混合式学习模式的灵活性、自主性和自我节奏的同时,他们错过了与同龄人和教授更密切的互动,难以吸收某些内容。相应地,有远程在线教育经历的学生在混合学习中通常表现出更好的倾向,并且发现更少的缺点。这表明,经验因素和对新工具和方法的适应提高了学生的感知和信心,并塑造了他们的偏好,可以预见,未来混合式学习的接受程度将越来越高。最后,结果允许我们定义一系列策略来提高学生在这种学习环境中的成就、经验和满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
12.50%
发文量
5
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信