How digital citizenship regimes are rescaling European nation-states

IF 2.2 Q2 GEOGRAPHY

SPACE AND POLITY Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/13562576.2022.2072197

Igor Calzada

引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This provocation shows how five emerging digital citizenship regimes are rescaling European nation-states through a taxonomy: (i) the globalised/generalisable regime called pandemic citizenship that clarifies how post-COVID-19 datafication processes have amplified the emergence of four digital citizenship regimes in six city-regions; (ii) algorithmic citizenship (Tallinn); (iii) liquid citizenship (Barcelona/Amsterdam); (iv) metropolitan citizenship (Cardiff); and (v) stateless citizenship (Barcelona/Glasgow/Bilbao). I argue that this phenomenon should matter to us insofar as these emerging digital citizenship regimes have resulted in nation-state space rescaling, challenging its heretofore privileged position as the only natural platform for the monopoly of technopolitical and sensory power.

查看原文本刊更多论文

数字公民制度是如何重塑欧洲民族国家的

这一挑战展示了五种新兴的数字公民制度如何通过一种分类法重新调整欧洲民族国家的规模:(i)被称为大流行公民的全球化/普遍化制度，它阐明了后covid -19数据化进程如何放大了六个城市地区四种数字公民制度的出现;算法公民(塔林);流动公民身份(巴塞罗那/阿姆斯特丹);(iv)城市公民身份(卡迪夫);无国籍公民身份(巴塞罗那/格拉斯哥/毕尔巴鄂)。我认为，这种现象对我们来说应该很重要，因为这些新兴的数字公民制度导致了民族国家空间的重新扩展，挑战了其迄今为止作为垄断技术政治和感官权力的唯一天然平台的特权地位。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

SPACE AND POLITY GEOGRAPHY-

CiteScore

4.10

自引率

4.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： Space & Polity is a fully refereed scholarly international journal devoted to the theoretical and empirical understanding of the changing relationships between the state, and regional and local forms of governance. The journal provides a forum aimed particularly at bringing together social scientists currently working in a variety of disciplines, including geography, political science, sociology, economics, anthropology and development studies and who have a common interest in the relationships between space, place and politics in less developed as well as the advanced economies.