Usefulness of myocardial work assessment for the understanding of mechanisms underlying sacubitril/valsartan efficacy in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction

F. Luciano, C. Santoro, V. Capone, O. Casciano, M. Canonico, T. Fedele, SO Silvia Orefice, L. Fiorillo, R. Esposito
{"title":"Usefulness of myocardial work assessment for the understanding of mechanisms underlying sacubitril/valsartan efficacy in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction","authors":"F. Luciano, C. Santoro, V. Capone, O. Casciano, M. Canonico, T. Fedele, SO Silvia Orefice, L. Fiorillo, R. Esposito","doi":"10.1093/EHJCI/JEAA356.129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Type of funding sources: None.\n \n \n \n  Sacubitril/valsartan has shown the ability in reducing the risk of death and of hospitalization in patients with HF (heart failure) and is recommended in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who remain symptomatic despite conventional therapies. Strain imaging derived myocardial work (MW) is an emerging tool for the evaluation of left ventricular (LV) mechanics by incorporating both systolic deformation and afterload burden in the analysis.\n \n \n \n To evaluate in a prospective fashion the impact of sacubitril/valsartan therapy in HF patients on MW derived parameters in relation with standard echocardiographic indices.\n \n \n \n We recruited thirteen HF patients with indication to sacubitril/valsartan therapy according to current guidelines. Sacubitril/valsartan therapy titrated at the maximum tolerated dose. A comprehensive echo-Doppler exam, including speckle tracking derived assessment of global longitudinal strain (GLS) (in absolute value), was performed before and after a three months therapy with sacubitril/valsartan. Parameters of MW such as global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW) global wasted work (GWW) and global work efficiency (GWE) were calculated according to standardized procedures. Patients with more than mild aortic and mitral stenosis and/or regurgitation were excluded. Other exclusion criteria included permanent and/or persistent atrial fibrillation and inadequate echo images.\n \n \n \n The 13 patients (M/F = 11/2, age: 57 ± 8.2 years, aetiology: idiopathic in 3 patients, ischaemic in 7 patients and chemotherapy related cardiotoxicity in 3 patients, NYHA Class: II in 7 and III in 6 patients). All patients tolerated sacubitril/valsartan therapy. After the three months therapy an improvement of  LVEF (from 32.3 ± 2% to 36.2± 6%, p = 0.015), GLS (from 9.8 ± 1% to 11.6 ± 2%, p = 0.019), GWI (from 845.0 ± 175.0 mmHg% to 1091.6 ± 336.8 mmHg%, p = 0.003), GCW (from  993.4± 211.6 mmHg% to 1262.7 ± 404 mmHg%, p = 0.002) and GWE (from 77 ± 11% to 81 ± 10%, p = 0.002) was observed, without significant changes in GWW (from 190 ± 121 mmHg% to 211 ± 145 mmHg%, p = 0.307). We also found a positive correlation between the magnitude of LVEF improvement and the baseline values of GCW (r = 0.66, p = 0.014). This relation remained significant even after adjusting for the extent of systolic blood pressure reduction (r = 0.54, p = 0.033).\n \n \n \n Three months sacubitril/valsartan therapy significantly improves standard and advanced indices of LV systolic function. This improvement is due to the increase of constructive work more than to the reduction of wasted work and the increase of LVEF can be predicted by the global constructive work levels at baseline. MW assessment may help to understand the mechanisms underlying the sacubitril/valsartan therapy efficacy in HF patients.\n Abstract Figure.\n","PeriodicalId":11963,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Echocardiography","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Echocardiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/EHJCI/JEAA356.129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Type of funding sources: None.  Sacubitril/valsartan has shown the ability in reducing the risk of death and of hospitalization in patients with HF (heart failure) and is recommended in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who remain symptomatic despite conventional therapies. Strain imaging derived myocardial work (MW) is an emerging tool for the evaluation of left ventricular (LV) mechanics by incorporating both systolic deformation and afterload burden in the analysis. To evaluate in a prospective fashion the impact of sacubitril/valsartan therapy in HF patients on MW derived parameters in relation with standard echocardiographic indices. We recruited thirteen HF patients with indication to sacubitril/valsartan therapy according to current guidelines. Sacubitril/valsartan therapy titrated at the maximum tolerated dose. A comprehensive echo-Doppler exam, including speckle tracking derived assessment of global longitudinal strain (GLS) (in absolute value), was performed before and after a three months therapy with sacubitril/valsartan. Parameters of MW such as global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW) global wasted work (GWW) and global work efficiency (GWE) were calculated according to standardized procedures. Patients with more than mild aortic and mitral stenosis and/or regurgitation were excluded. Other exclusion criteria included permanent and/or persistent atrial fibrillation and inadequate echo images. The 13 patients (M/F = 11/2, age: 57 ± 8.2 years, aetiology: idiopathic in 3 patients, ischaemic in 7 patients and chemotherapy related cardiotoxicity in 3 patients, NYHA Class: II in 7 and III in 6 patients). All patients tolerated sacubitril/valsartan therapy. After the three months therapy an improvement of  LVEF (from 32.3 ± 2% to 36.2± 6%, p = 0.015), GLS (from 9.8 ± 1% to 11.6 ± 2%, p = 0.019), GWI (from 845.0 ± 175.0 mmHg% to 1091.6 ± 336.8 mmHg%, p = 0.003), GCW (from  993.4± 211.6 mmHg% to 1262.7 ± 404 mmHg%, p = 0.002) and GWE (from 77 ± 11% to 81 ± 10%, p = 0.002) was observed, without significant changes in GWW (from 190 ± 121 mmHg% to 211 ± 145 mmHg%, p = 0.307). We also found a positive correlation between the magnitude of LVEF improvement and the baseline values of GCW (r = 0.66, p = 0.014). This relation remained significant even after adjusting for the extent of systolic blood pressure reduction (r = 0.54, p = 0.033). Three months sacubitril/valsartan therapy significantly improves standard and advanced indices of LV systolic function. This improvement is due to the increase of constructive work more than to the reduction of wasted work and the increase of LVEF can be predicted by the global constructive work levels at baseline. MW assessment may help to understand the mechanisms underlying the sacubitril/valsartan therapy efficacy in HF patients. Abstract Figure.
心肌功评估对了解苏比里尔/缬沙坦对心力衰竭和射血分数降低患者疗效的机制的有用性
资金来源类型:无。Sacubitril/缬沙坦已显示出降低HF(心力衰竭)患者死亡和住院风险的能力,并被推荐用于射血分数降低(HFrEF)的心力衰竭患者,尽管常规治疗仍有症状。应变成像衍生心肌功(MW)是一种评估左心室(LV)力学的新兴工具,它在分析中结合了收缩变形和后负荷负荷。前瞻性评价苏比利/缬沙坦治疗HF患者对与标准超声心动图指标相关的MW衍生参数的影响。我们招募了13名心衰患者,根据目前的指南,有苏比里尔/缬沙坦治疗的适应症。萨奎比利/缬沙坦治疗以最大耐受剂量滴定。在使用苏比里尔/缬沙坦治疗3个月前后,进行了全面的超声多普勒检查,包括斑点跟踪得出的全球纵向应变(GLS)(绝对值)评估。按照标准化程序计算了MW的全局工作指数(GWI)、全局建设工作(GCW)、全局浪费工作(GWW)和全局工作效率(GWE)等参数。排除有轻度以上主动脉瓣和二尖瓣狭窄和/或反流的患者。其他排除标准包括永久性和/或持续性房颤和不充分的回声图像。13例患者(M/F = 11/2,年龄:57±8.2岁,病因:特发性3例,缺血性7例,化疗相关心脏毒性3例,NYHA分级:II级7例,III级6例)。所有患者耐受sacubitril/缬沙坦治疗。LVEF三个月治疗后有所改善(从32.3±2%到36.2±6%,p = 0.015), gl(9.8±1%至11.6±2%,p = 0.019),描述(从845.0±175.0毫米汞柱1091.6±336.8 mmHg % %, p = 0.003), GCW(从993.4±211.6毫米汞柱1262.7±404毫米汞柱% %,p = 0.002)和GWE(77±11%至81±10%,p = 0.002)观察,没有重大变化GWW(190±121 mmHg % 211±145 mmHg %, p = 0.307)。我们还发现LVEF改善程度与GCW基线值呈正相关(r = 0.66, p = 0.014)。即使在调整收缩压降低的程度后,这种关系仍然显著(r = 0.54, p = 0.033)。舒比利/缬沙坦治疗3个月可显著改善左室收缩功能的标准和高级指标。这种改善是由于建设性工作的增加,而不是由于浪费工作的减少,LVEF的增加可以通过基线的全球建设性工作水平来预测。MW评估可能有助于了解苏比里尔/缬沙坦治疗HF患者疗效的机制。抽象的图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Echocardiography
European Journal of Echocardiography 医学-心血管系统
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书