Factors Determining the Choice of Vegetarian vs. Meat-Eating Diets

Alexie C. Maxwell, A. Smith, Emily R. Thomas, S. Abraham, Deborah R. Gillum
{"title":"Factors Determining the Choice of Vegetarian vs. Meat-Eating Diets","authors":"Alexie C. Maxwell, A. Smith, Emily R. Thomas, S. Abraham, Deborah R. Gillum","doi":"10.20849/IJSN.V4I3.598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There are various opinions of what eating healthy looks like, and it has become a frequent topic of discussion among young adults. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the factors determining the choice of vegetarian vs. meat-eating diet. Method: This study was a qualitative phenomenological study with a descriptive design that was conducted at a college in northern Indiana area using one-on-one interviews. The sample size was 16 individuals, 8 who use the vegetarian diet, and 8 who are meat-eaters. Pender’s health promotion model was used to guide this study. Results: There were 9 themes that emerged, of which 5 were vegan/vegetarian and 4 were meat-eaters. The vegetarian and vegan themes were limitation of the diet (1), health effects (2), confusion and stigma about diet (3), reasons for choosing this diet (4), and more conscious of what they eat (5). The meat-eating themes were choices (1), health effects (2), mocking and ridiculing (3), and workout (4). Conclusion: Overall, meat-eaters had more choices in their diet and vegetarians and vegans struggled with limitations. They discussed mocking or stigma about their diets as well as health effects. The need for further studies on this topic is evident from the literature review. ","PeriodicalId":93573,"journal":{"name":"International journal of studies in nursing","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of studies in nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20849/IJSN.V4I3.598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: There are various opinions of what eating healthy looks like, and it has become a frequent topic of discussion among young adults. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the factors determining the choice of vegetarian vs. meat-eating diet. Method: This study was a qualitative phenomenological study with a descriptive design that was conducted at a college in northern Indiana area using one-on-one interviews. The sample size was 16 individuals, 8 who use the vegetarian diet, and 8 who are meat-eaters. Pender’s health promotion model was used to guide this study. Results: There were 9 themes that emerged, of which 5 were vegan/vegetarian and 4 were meat-eaters. The vegetarian and vegan themes were limitation of the diet (1), health effects (2), confusion and stigma about diet (3), reasons for choosing this diet (4), and more conscious of what they eat (5). The meat-eating themes were choices (1), health effects (2), mocking and ridiculing (3), and workout (4). Conclusion: Overall, meat-eaters had more choices in their diet and vegetarians and vegans struggled with limitations. They discussed mocking or stigma about their diets as well as health effects. The need for further studies on this topic is evident from the literature review. 
决定素食与肉食饮食选择的因素
背景:关于什么是健康饮食有各种各样的观点,这已经成为年轻人经常讨论的话题。目的:本研究的目的是探讨决定素食和吃肉饮食选择的因素。方法:本研究采用描述设计的定性现象学研究,在印第安纳州北部地区的一所大学进行一对一访谈。样本大小为16人,8人使用素食,8人是肉食者。本研究采用Pender健康促进模型作为指导。结果:出现了9个主题,其中5个是纯素/素食者,4个是肉食者。素食者和纯素食者的主题是饮食的限制(1),健康影响(2),对饮食的困惑和耻辱(3),选择这种饮食的原因(4),更有意识地吃什么(5)。吃肉的主题是选择(1),健康影响(2),嘲笑和嘲笑(3),锻炼(4)。结论:总体而言,肉食者在饮食中有更多的选择,素食者和纯素食者在限制中挣扎。他们讨论了对自己饮食的嘲笑或羞辱,以及对健康的影响。从文献综述中可以看出,对这一主题进行进一步研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信