No Increase in Fractures After Stopping Hormone Therapy: Results From the Women’s Health Initiative

N. Watts, J. Cauley, R. Jackson, A. LaCroix, Cora E. Lewis, J. Manson, J. Neuner, L. Phillips, M. Stefanick, J. Wactawski‐Wende, C. Crandall
{"title":"No Increase in Fractures After Stopping Hormone Therapy: Results From the Women’s Health Initiative","authors":"N. Watts, J. Cauley, R. Jackson, A. LaCroix, Cora E. Lewis, J. Manson, J. Neuner, L. Phillips, M. Stefanick, J. Wactawski‐Wende, C. Crandall","doi":"10.1210/jc.2016-3270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context\nThe Women's Health Initiative (WHI) hormone therapy (HT) trials showed protection against hip and total fractures, but a later observational report suggested loss of benefit and a rebound increased risk after cessation of HT.\n\n\nObjective\nThe purpose of this study was to examine fractures after discontinuation of HT.\n\n\nDesign and Setting\nTwo placebo-controlled randomized trials served as the study setting.\n\n\nPatients\nStudy patients included WHI participants (N = 15,187) who continued active HT or placebo through the intervention period and who did not take HT in the postintervention period.\n\n\nInterventions\nTrial interventions included conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in naturally menopausal women and CEE alone in women with prior hysterectomy.\n\n\nMain Outcome Measures\nTotal fractures and hip fractures through 5 years after discontinuation of HT were recorded.\n\n\nResults\nHip fractures were infrequent (∼2.5 per 1000 person-years); this finding was similar between trials and in former HT and placebo groups. There was no difference in total fractures in the CEE + MPA trial for former HT vs former placebo users (28.9 per 1000 person-years and 29.9 per 1000 person-years, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.09; P = 0.63); however, in the CEE-alone trial, total fractures were higher in former placebo users (36.9 per 1000 person-years) compared with the former active group (31.1 per 1000 person-years), a finding that was suggestive of a residual benefit of CEE against total fractures (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.98; P = 0.03).\n\n\nConclusions\nWe found no evidence for increased fracture risk, either sustained or transient, for former HT users compared with former placebo users after stopping HT. There was residual benefit for total fractures in former HT users from the CEE-alone study.","PeriodicalId":22632,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":"31 1","pages":"302–308"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-3270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

Abstract

Context The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) hormone therapy (HT) trials showed protection against hip and total fractures, but a later observational report suggested loss of benefit and a rebound increased risk after cessation of HT. Objective The purpose of this study was to examine fractures after discontinuation of HT. Design and Setting Two placebo-controlled randomized trials served as the study setting. Patients Study patients included WHI participants (N = 15,187) who continued active HT or placebo through the intervention period and who did not take HT in the postintervention period. Interventions Trial interventions included conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in naturally menopausal women and CEE alone in women with prior hysterectomy. Main Outcome Measures Total fractures and hip fractures through 5 years after discontinuation of HT were recorded. Results Hip fractures were infrequent (∼2.5 per 1000 person-years); this finding was similar between trials and in former HT and placebo groups. There was no difference in total fractures in the CEE + MPA trial for former HT vs former placebo users (28.9 per 1000 person-years and 29.9 per 1000 person-years, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.09; P = 0.63); however, in the CEE-alone trial, total fractures were higher in former placebo users (36.9 per 1000 person-years) compared with the former active group (31.1 per 1000 person-years), a finding that was suggestive of a residual benefit of CEE against total fractures (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.98; P = 0.03). Conclusions We found no evidence for increased fracture risk, either sustained or transient, for former HT users compared with former placebo users after stopping HT. There was residual benefit for total fractures in former HT users from the CEE-alone study.
停止激素治疗后骨折发生率不增加:来自妇女健康倡议的结果
妇女健康倡议(WHI)激素治疗(HT)试验显示对髋部和全骨折有保护作用,但后来的一项观察性报告显示,停止激素治疗后,疗效丧失,风险反弹增加。目的探讨热疗停止后的骨折情况。设计与设置两个安慰剂对照随机试验作为研究设置。患者研究患者包括WHI参与者(N = 15,187),他们在干预期间继续使用活性HT或安慰剂,并且在干预后未使用HT。干预措施包括在自然绝经妇女中结合马雌激素(CEE)加醋酸甲羟孕酮(MPA)和在既往子宫切除术妇女中单独使用CEE。主要观察指标:记录停药后5年内的直肠骨折和髋部骨折。结果髋部骨折发生率较低(每1000人年2.5例);这一发现在试验之间以及在前HT组和安慰剂组中是相似的。在CEE + MPA试验中,前HT患者与前安慰剂患者的总骨折数没有差异(分别为28.9 / 1000人年和29.9 / 1000人年);风险比[HR], 0.97;95%可信区间[CI], 0.87 ~ 1.09;P = 0.63);然而,在CEE单独试验中,前安慰剂使用者的总骨折(36.9 / 1000人年)高于前活动组(31.1 / 1000人年),这一发现提示CEE对总骨折的剩余益处(HR, 0.85;95% CI, 0.73 ~ 0.98;P = 0.03)。结论:我们没有发现证据表明,在停止激素治疗后,前激素疗法使用者与前安慰剂使用者相比,骨折风险增加,无论是持续的还是短暂的。单独使用cee的研究对前HT使用者的全骨折有剩余益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信