Prognostic Significance of the Standardized Uptake Value of Pretherapeutic 18F-Labeled 2-Fluoro-2-Deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.

Ajit Gubbi, Shimoni Kacheria, Sarfraz Ahmad, Nicole M Stavitzski, James E Kendrick
{"title":"Prognostic Significance of the Standardized Uptake Value of Pretherapeutic 18F-Labeled 2-Fluoro-2-Deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.","authors":"Ajit Gubbi, Shimoni Kacheria, Sarfraz Ahmad, Nicole M Stavitzski, James E Kendrick","doi":"10.1097/IGC.0000000000000930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the prognostic significance of the pretreatment and posttreatment maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of F-labeled 2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography imaging in patients with stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective review of cervical cancer patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IB2-IVA, from March 2008 to April 2014. All patients had pretreatment and posttreatment PET imaging and received primary whole pelvic radiation therapy with concurrent radiosensitizing chemotherapy, followed by intracavitary brachytherapy. Of the 58 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 31 patients (group A) showed no evidence of disease at last follow-up, and 27 patients (group B) presented with recurrence/persistence of disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean pretreatment SUVmax in group A was 17.65 ± 7.82 versus 18.8 ± 7.77 in group B (P = 0.577). The mean posttreatment SUVmax between the groups was 0.85 ± 1.83 versus 6.05 ± 3.01 (P < 0.001), respectively. The mean difference between pretreatment and posttreatment SUVmax was 17.73 ± 7.50 in group A versus 13.29 ± 7.15 in group B (P = 0.045). In group A, 80.7% of patients demonstrated no posttreatment hypermetabolic activity on PET imaging versus 11.1% in group B. Of the patients who experienced treatment failure, the site of failure was pelvic in 25.9%, distant in 44.4%, and both pelvic and distant in 29.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No threshold was identified for the pretreatment SUVmax relative to the risk of recurrence. However, distinct correlations were found between the risk of recurrence, percent reduction in SUVmax, and the observation of residual hypermetabolic activity. This finding may help identify candidates for sequential chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13983,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer","volume":"22 1","pages":"530-536"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the prognostic significance of the pretreatment and posttreatment maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of F-labeled 2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography imaging in patients with stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer.

Methods: This was a retrospective review of cervical cancer patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IB2-IVA, from March 2008 to April 2014. All patients had pretreatment and posttreatment PET imaging and received primary whole pelvic radiation therapy with concurrent radiosensitizing chemotherapy, followed by intracavitary brachytherapy. Of the 58 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 31 patients (group A) showed no evidence of disease at last follow-up, and 27 patients (group B) presented with recurrence/persistence of disease.

Results: The mean pretreatment SUVmax in group A was 17.65 ± 7.82 versus 18.8 ± 7.77 in group B (P = 0.577). The mean posttreatment SUVmax between the groups was 0.85 ± 1.83 versus 6.05 ± 3.01 (P < 0.001), respectively. The mean difference between pretreatment and posttreatment SUVmax was 17.73 ± 7.50 in group A versus 13.29 ± 7.15 in group B (P = 0.045). In group A, 80.7% of patients demonstrated no posttreatment hypermetabolic activity on PET imaging versus 11.1% in group B. Of the patients who experienced treatment failure, the site of failure was pelvic in 25.9%, distant in 44.4%, and both pelvic and distant in 29.6%.

Conclusions: No threshold was identified for the pretreatment SUVmax relative to the risk of recurrence. However, distinct correlations were found between the risk of recurrence, percent reduction in SUVmax, and the observation of residual hypermetabolic activity. This finding may help identify candidates for sequential chemotherapy.

局部晚期宫颈癌患者治疗前18f标记2-氟-2-脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描标准化摄取值的预后意义
目的:探讨f -标记2-氟-2-脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(PET)/计算机断层扫描成像治疗前后最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)对IB2-IVA期宫颈癌患者预后的意义。方法:回顾性分析2008年3月至2014年4月国际妇产科联合会IB2-IVA期宫颈癌患者。所有患者术前和术后均行PET显像,并接受原发性全盆腔放射治疗,同时进行放射增敏化疗,随后进行腔内近距离放疗。在符合纳入标准的58例患者中,31例患者(A组)在最后随访时无疾病证据,27例患者(B组)出现疾病复发/持续。结果:A组预处理后平均SUVmax为17.65±7.82,B组为18.8±7.77 (P = 0.577)。两组治疗后平均SUVmax分别为0.85±1.83和6.05±3.01 (P < 0.001)。A组治疗前后SUVmax平均差值为17.73±7.50,B组为13.29±7.15 (P = 0.045)。在A组中,80.7%的患者在PET成像上显示治疗后无高代谢活动,而b组为11.1%。在治疗失败的患者中,25.9%的患者失败部位为盆腔,44.4%的患者失败部位为远处,29.6%的患者失败部位为盆腔和远处。结论:未发现与复发风险相关的SUVmax预处理阈值。然而,在复发风险、SUVmax减少百分比和观察到的残余高代谢活性之间发现了明显的相关性。这一发现可能有助于确定序贯化疗的候选者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书