Inheriting the throne during the Mamluk era in Egypt in light of inscriptions on Mamluk coins: وراثة العرش في العصر المملوكي في مصر في ضوء النقوش الكتابية على النقود المملوكية

Elshahat Anwar Barakat
{"title":"Inheriting the throne during the Mamluk era in Egypt in light of inscriptions on Mamluk coins: وراثة العرش في العصر المملوكي في مصر في ضوء النقوش الكتابية على النقود المملوكية","authors":"Elshahat Anwar Barakat","doi":"10.26389/ajsrp.b150820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to study the principle of inheriting the throne of the Mamluks, as inheriting the throne was one of the things that have no place in the shadow of the Mamluk state in its two parts, as the prevailing principle in governance in the Mamluk era was the principle of \"authority for the one who overcame\", where the one who possesses power Hegemony is the most worthy of power after the death or deposition of the existing Sultan, but the Mamluk era did not pass through periods in which the throne was inherited for some of the Sultans, as happened with the sons of Al-Zahir Baybars, and also during the era of the Bani Qalawun family, where the news and descendants inherited the throne for a period of time, But that was not a permanent matter, but rather an interim matter, until one of the princes, was able to extract power from the existing Sultan, after proving his right and strength, and this matter remained followed until the end of the Mamluks' era. This was done through the historical method based on the writings that were received on the money, and the researcher concluded: 1- The inheritance of the throne existed in the Mamluk era, but for a few periods, because the Mamluks did not believe in this principle in the transfer of power. 2- The Mamluk’s recognition of the principle of inheriting the throne was only part of their plan to reach the throne when their ranks were divided and one of them was above and showed his victory over other princes fighting with him. 3- That some of those who inherited the rule of the Mamluks were able to prove their competence and rule for long periods, such as Khalil bin Qalawun and Al-Nasir Muhammad Yin Qalawun. 4- The Mamluk doctrine never believed in the inheritance of the throne, and for you in spite of that, there were many cases of inheriting the throne in the Mamluk era.  and the researcher recommended the need to rely on writings and inscriptions on the monuments to document historical events accurately.","PeriodicalId":32779,"journal":{"name":"Mizoram University Journal of Humanities Social Sciences","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mizoram University Journal of Humanities Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26389/ajsrp.b150820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to study the principle of inheriting the throne of the Mamluks, as inheriting the throne was one of the things that have no place in the shadow of the Mamluk state in its two parts, as the prevailing principle in governance in the Mamluk era was the principle of "authority for the one who overcame", where the one who possesses power Hegemony is the most worthy of power after the death or deposition of the existing Sultan, but the Mamluk era did not pass through periods in which the throne was inherited for some of the Sultans, as happened with the sons of Al-Zahir Baybars, and also during the era of the Bani Qalawun family, where the news and descendants inherited the throne for a period of time, But that was not a permanent matter, but rather an interim matter, until one of the princes, was able to extract power from the existing Sultan, after proving his right and strength, and this matter remained followed until the end of the Mamluks' era. This was done through the historical method based on the writings that were received on the money, and the researcher concluded: 1- The inheritance of the throne existed in the Mamluk era, but for a few periods, because the Mamluks did not believe in this principle in the transfer of power. 2- The Mamluk’s recognition of the principle of inheriting the throne was only part of their plan to reach the throne when their ranks were divided and one of them was above and showed his victory over other princes fighting with him. 3- That some of those who inherited the rule of the Mamluks were able to prove their competence and rule for long periods, such as Khalil bin Qalawun and Al-Nasir Muhammad Yin Qalawun. 4- The Mamluk doctrine never believed in the inheritance of the throne, and for you in spite of that, there were many cases of inheriting the throne in the Mamluk era.  and the researcher recommended the need to rely on writings and inscriptions on the monuments to document historical events accurately.
在埃及王国时期,根据在钱币上的文字铭文,继承了王位。
本研究旨在研究马穆鲁克王朝的王位继承原则,因为继承王位在马穆鲁克王朝的两个部分的阴影中是没有位置的,因为马穆鲁克王朝统治的主流原则是“征服者的权威”原则,在现存的苏丹死亡或被废黜后,谁拥有权力谁就最有资格获得权力。但马穆鲁克时代没有经过时间的王位继承了一些苏丹,是发生在的儿子Al-Zahir Baybars,也在巴尼Qalawun家族的时代,新闻和后代继承王位的一段时间,但这不是一个永久性的问题,而是一个临时的事,直到一个首领,能够从现有的苏丹,提取功率后,证明他的权利和力量,这件事一直延续到马穆鲁克时代结束。这是通过基于在钱上收到的文字的历史方法来完成的,研究人员得出结论:1-王位继承存在于马穆鲁克时代,但只有几个时期,因为马穆鲁克人不相信权力转移中的这一原则。马穆鲁克承认继承王位的原则只是他们登上王位计划的一部分,当他们的队伍分裂时,其中一个在上面,显示他战胜了其他与他一起战斗的王子。3-一些继承了马穆鲁克统治的人能够证明他们的能力并长期统治,比如哈利勒·本·卡拉文和阿尔·纳西尔·穆罕默德·尹·卡拉文。4-马穆鲁克学说从不相信王位的继承,尽管如此,在马穆鲁克时代有很多继承王位的例子。研究人员建议,需要依靠纪念碑上的文字和铭文来准确地记录历史事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信