The Epoch and Personality of Peter the Great in Nikolay Charykov’s Research

IF 0.2 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
O. Chernov
{"title":"The Epoch and Personality of Peter the Great in Nikolay Charykov’s Research","authors":"O. Chernov","doi":"10.24833/2071-8160-2022-5-86-7-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article reviews the academic contribution of Russian historian and diplomat Nikolay Charykov (1855-1930) to our understanding of the reforms by Peter the Great. In his research, Nikolay Charykov argues that the reforms did not result in a radical break with previous Russia's historical path. He stresses that the cultivation of scientific knowledge and labor skills necessary for modernization started in Russia long before Peter the Great because Russia was part of a European system even before Peter the Great. For example, the author points to Ivan III's marriage to Zoe Palaiologina (Sophia Palaiologina); the employment of captive Livonians by Ivan IV; sending Russian youth to study at Western European universities; Boris Godunov's plans to form a European league of Christian sovereigns. Nikolay Charykov focuses in his studies on the reign of Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich, pointing to his plans to increase the involvement of Westerners in various spheres of life in Russia. Moreover, Nikolay Charykov shows that the personality of the future Emperor was formed under the influence of Russia's increasing interaction with European countries. He concludes that the development of Russia before Peter led to Peter's reforms. He saw the struggle between Sophia and Peter as an interpersonal struggle for power, which in no way violated the primary trend of Russia's development. Peter's reforms became a logical and natural consequence of the previous processes. The merit of Peter was that he successfully continued the previously started transformations by adding to them his character and thinking, which led to the birth of the Russian Empire.","PeriodicalId":42127,"journal":{"name":"MGIMO Review of International Relations","volume":"565 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MGIMO Review of International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-5-86-7-26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article reviews the academic contribution of Russian historian and diplomat Nikolay Charykov (1855-1930) to our understanding of the reforms by Peter the Great. In his research, Nikolay Charykov argues that the reforms did not result in a radical break with previous Russia's historical path. He stresses that the cultivation of scientific knowledge and labor skills necessary for modernization started in Russia long before Peter the Great because Russia was part of a European system even before Peter the Great. For example, the author points to Ivan III's marriage to Zoe Palaiologina (Sophia Palaiologina); the employment of captive Livonians by Ivan IV; sending Russian youth to study at Western European universities; Boris Godunov's plans to form a European league of Christian sovereigns. Nikolay Charykov focuses in his studies on the reign of Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich, pointing to his plans to increase the involvement of Westerners in various spheres of life in Russia. Moreover, Nikolay Charykov shows that the personality of the future Emperor was formed under the influence of Russia's increasing interaction with European countries. He concludes that the development of Russia before Peter led to Peter's reforms. He saw the struggle between Sophia and Peter as an interpersonal struggle for power, which in no way violated the primary trend of Russia's development. Peter's reforms became a logical and natural consequence of the previous processes. The merit of Peter was that he successfully continued the previously started transformations by adding to them his character and thinking, which led to the birth of the Russian Empire.
尼古拉·查里科夫研究彼得大帝的时代与人格
本文回顾了俄国历史学家、外交家尼古拉·查里科夫(Nikolay Charykov, 1855-1930)对我们理解彼得大帝改革的学术贡献。尼古拉·查里科夫(Nikolay Charykov)在他的研究中认为,改革并没有导致俄罗斯与以前的历史道路彻底决裂。他强调,现代化所需的科学知识和劳动技能的培养早在彼得大帝之前就在俄罗斯开始了,因为俄罗斯在彼得大帝之前就是欧洲体系的一部分。例如,作者指出伊凡三世与佐伊·帕莱洛吉娜(索菲亚·帕莱洛吉娜)的婚姻;伊凡四世雇佣被俘的利沃尼亚人;送俄罗斯青年到西欧大学学习;鲍里斯·戈杜诺夫组建欧洲基督教主权联盟的计划。尼古拉·查里科夫(Nikolay Charykov)专注于沙皇阿列克谢·米哈伊洛维奇(Alexei Mikhailovich)统治时期的研究,指出他计划增加西方人在俄罗斯生活各个领域的参与。此外,尼古拉·查里科夫(Nikolay Charykov)表明,未来皇帝的性格是在俄罗斯与欧洲国家日益增多的互动影响下形成的。他的结论是彼得之前俄国的发展导致了彼得的改革。在他看来,索菲亚和彼得之间的斗争是人与人之间的权力斗争,这丝毫没有违背俄罗斯发展的主要趋势。彼得的改革成为先前进程的合乎逻辑和自然的结果。彼得大帝的功绩在于,他成功地延续了先前开始的变革,并在变革中加入了自己的性格和思想,这导致了俄罗斯帝国的诞生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MGIMO Review of International Relations
MGIMO Review of International Relations INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信