Are introduced spiders displacing native species on Galápagos? Observations on pholcid spiders (Araneae: Pholcidae)

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Bernhard A. Huber, Andrea E. Acurio
{"title":"Are introduced spiders displacing native species on Galápagos? Observations on pholcid spiders (Araneae: Pholcidae)","authors":"Bernhard A. Huber, Andrea E. Acurio","doi":"10.13156/arac.2022.19.sp1.191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The spider family Pholcidae includes several species that have followed humans to other continents and around the world. Negative impacts of these species on the local faunas have never been reported. Here, we present results of a short collecting trip to Galápagos in 2019, focusing on two species that have been introduced to the archipelago by humans and whose spread appears correlated with, if not causally linked to, the decline or disappearance of two native species occupying the same micro-habitats: 1) the local abundance of the introduced Modisimus culicinus (Simon, 1893) appears negatively correlated with the abundance of the native Galapa bella (Gertsch & Peck, 1992), and 2) the recently introduced Smeringopus pallidus (Blackwall, 1858) is now abundant in caves where a few decades ago the native Aymaria jarmila (Gertsch & Peck, 1992) was present. The last species was not found in any of the six caves visited on Santa Cruz Island in 2019, suggesting that it may be seriously threatened. In addition, we present new records of Pholcidae from Galápagos and re-emphasize the need to reconsider the distinction between the two epigean Aymaria species on Galápagos: A. conica (Banks, 1902) and A. insularis (Banks, 1902).","PeriodicalId":38197,"journal":{"name":"Arachnology","volume":"32 1","pages":"191 - 198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arachnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13156/arac.2022.19.sp1.191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The spider family Pholcidae includes several species that have followed humans to other continents and around the world. Negative impacts of these species on the local faunas have never been reported. Here, we present results of a short collecting trip to Galápagos in 2019, focusing on two species that have been introduced to the archipelago by humans and whose spread appears correlated with, if not causally linked to, the decline or disappearance of two native species occupying the same micro-habitats: 1) the local abundance of the introduced Modisimus culicinus (Simon, 1893) appears negatively correlated with the abundance of the native Galapa bella (Gertsch & Peck, 1992), and 2) the recently introduced Smeringopus pallidus (Blackwall, 1858) is now abundant in caves where a few decades ago the native Aymaria jarmila (Gertsch & Peck, 1992) was present. The last species was not found in any of the six caves visited on Santa Cruz Island in 2019, suggesting that it may be seriously threatened. In addition, we present new records of Pholcidae from Galápagos and re-emphasize the need to reconsider the distinction between the two epigean Aymaria species on Galápagos: A. conica (Banks, 1902) and A. insularis (Banks, 1902).
引进的蜘蛛正在取代Galápagos上的本地蜘蛛吗?粘蛛的观察(蜘蛛目:粘蛛科)
蜘蛛科包括几种随人类迁徙到其他大陆和世界各地的蜘蛛。这些物种对当地动物群的负面影响从未被报道过。在这里,我们展示了2019年对Galápagos进行短期收集的结果,重点关注了由人类引入群岛的两种物种,它们的传播似乎与占据相同微栖息地的两种本地物种的减少或消失相关,如果不是因果关系的话:1)引进的Modisimus culicinus (Simon, 1893)的本地丰度与本地Galapa bella (Gertsch & Peck, 1992)的丰度呈负相关,2)最近引进的Smeringopus pallidus (Blackwall, 1858)现在在几十年前本地Aymaria jarmila (Gertsch & Peck, 1992)存在的洞穴中大量存在。2019年在圣克鲁斯岛参观的六个洞穴中都没有发现最后一个物种,这表明它可能受到严重威胁。此外,我们提出了Galápagos的新记录,并再次强调需要重新考虑Galápagos上的两个表生Aymaria物种:A. conica (Banks, 1902)和A. insularis (Banks, 1902)之间的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arachnology
Arachnology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Insect Science
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信