“High Stakes” in the Symbolic Order: John Banville’s Love in the Wars Read through Jean Baudrillard / “Alto Risco” na Ordem Simbólica: Love in the Wars, de John Banville Lido Através de Jean Baudrillard
{"title":"“High Stakes” in the Symbolic Order: John Banville’s Love in the Wars Read through Jean Baudrillard / “Alto Risco” na Ordem Simbólica: Love in the Wars, de John Banville Lido Através de Jean Baudrillard","authors":"Hedda Friberg-Harnesk","doi":"10.37389/abei.v22i1.3849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: John Banville’s shrouded fictional territory suggests a Nietzschean world in which the notions of truth and reality are questioned and in the center of which humanity might find “an infinite nothing.” From Nietzsche’s bleak vision, the mind readily moves to Jean Baudrillard’s envisioned universe – even bleaker, perhaps – in which simulation is a “dominant mode of perception.” Baudrillard’s ideas are in dialogue with John Banville’s textual explorations of a territory of radical uncertainty. Elements of what can be seen as Baudrillardean third-order simulation are readily discernible in Banville’s late work, but in his play Love in the Wars , at focus in this article, it is Baudrillard’s notion of a pre-Renaissance symbolic order – an age of “the rule,” not of “the roll of the dice” – that has proved a superior analytical tool. Resumo: O territorio ficticio e obscuro de John Banville sugere um mundo nietzschiano no qual as nocoes de verdade e realidade sao questionadas e em cujo centro a humanidade pode encontrar “um nada infinito”. Da visao sombria de Nietzsche, a mente se move rapidamente para o universo imaginado de Jean Baudrillard – talvez ainda mais sombrio – em que a simulacao e um “modo dominante de percepcao”. As ideias de Baudrillard estao em dialogo com as exploracoes textuais de John Banville acerca de um territorio de incerteza radical. Instâncias daquilo que pode ser reconhecido como simulacao da terceira ordem baudrillardiana sao facilmente discerniveis no trabalho tardio de Banville; contudo, em sua peca Love in the Wars , foco deste artigo, a nocao de Baudrillard sobre uma ordem simbolica pre-renascentista – uma era da “ordem”, nao do “acaso” – provou ser uma ferramenta analitica superior.","PeriodicalId":29863,"journal":{"name":"EIGSE-A JOURNAL OF IRISH STUDIES","volume":"36 1","pages":"75-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EIGSE-A JOURNAL OF IRISH STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37389/abei.v22i1.3849","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: John Banville’s shrouded fictional territory suggests a Nietzschean world in which the notions of truth and reality are questioned and in the center of which humanity might find “an infinite nothing.” From Nietzsche’s bleak vision, the mind readily moves to Jean Baudrillard’s envisioned universe – even bleaker, perhaps – in which simulation is a “dominant mode of perception.” Baudrillard’s ideas are in dialogue with John Banville’s textual explorations of a territory of radical uncertainty. Elements of what can be seen as Baudrillardean third-order simulation are readily discernible in Banville’s late work, but in his play Love in the Wars , at focus in this article, it is Baudrillard’s notion of a pre-Renaissance symbolic order – an age of “the rule,” not of “the roll of the dice” – that has proved a superior analytical tool. Resumo: O territorio ficticio e obscuro de John Banville sugere um mundo nietzschiano no qual as nocoes de verdade e realidade sao questionadas e em cujo centro a humanidade pode encontrar “um nada infinito”. Da visao sombria de Nietzsche, a mente se move rapidamente para o universo imaginado de Jean Baudrillard – talvez ainda mais sombrio – em que a simulacao e um “modo dominante de percepcao”. As ideias de Baudrillard estao em dialogo com as exploracoes textuais de John Banville acerca de um territorio de incerteza radical. Instâncias daquilo que pode ser reconhecido como simulacao da terceira ordem baudrillardiana sao facilmente discerniveis no trabalho tardio de Banville; contudo, em sua peca Love in the Wars , foco deste artigo, a nocao de Baudrillard sobre uma ordem simbolica pre-renascentista – uma era da “ordem”, nao do “acaso” – provou ser uma ferramenta analitica superior.
摘要:约翰·班维尔(John Banville)被笼罩的虚构领域暗示了一个尼采式的世界,在这个世界中,真理和现实的概念受到质疑,在这个世界的中心,人类可能会发现“无限的虚无”。从尼采的黯淡愿景,我们的思想很容易转移到让·鲍德里亚设想的宇宙——甚至更黯淡,也许——在这个宇宙中,模拟是一种“主导的感知模式”。鲍德里亚的思想与约翰·班维尔对一个极端不确定领域的文本探索是对话的。在班维尔的晚期作品中,可以很容易地看出鲍德里亚三阶模拟的元素,但在他的戏剧《战争中的爱》中,本文的重点是,鲍德里亚关于文艺复兴前的象征秩序的概念——一个“规则”的时代,而不是“掷骰子”的时代——被证明是一个卓越的分析工具。履历表:领土官员对约翰·班维尔(John Banville)的“模糊”表示赞同,他认为“世界上的尼采主义”不等于“世界上的尼采主义”,因为他认为“人类主义”是“无限的”。尼采的幻梦,一种快速移动的精神,对宇宙的想象,让·鲍德里亚的幻梦,幻梦,幻梦,幻梦,幻梦,幻梦,幻梦,幻梦。正如鲍德里亚的思想建立在对话和文本的探索上,约翰·班维尔的思想建立在激进的领域上。instancias daquilo que pode ser reconconcido comcomo simulacao da terceira order baudrillardiana和设备识别是没有trabalho tardio de Banville;《战争中的爱情》、《战争中的爱情》、《波德里亚的爱情》、《波德里亚的爱情》、《波德里亚的爱情》、《波德里亚的爱情》、《波德里亚的爱情》、《波德里亚的爱情》、《波德里亚的爱情》、《波德里亚的爱情》、《波德里亚的爱情》、《波德里亚的爱情》、《波德里亚的爱情》、《波德里亚的爱情》。