Guardini, Plato and Nearness of Dying

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
B. Matos, Davor Šimunec
{"title":"Guardini, Plato and Nearness of Dying","authors":"B. Matos, Davor Šimunec","doi":"10.53745/bs.91.5.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors of the article have tried to present the experience of the closeness of death in Guardini’s interpretation of Plato’s dialogues between Socrates and his devoted disciples who could not accept the decision of their master and friend. Guardini’s interpretations were written as a philosophical analysis of the state of Socrates' mind, it is not a psychological analysis of his emotions or emotional states. Guardini wishes to reveal how Socrates faces the mystery of death as a philosopher. The authors focused on the dialogues between Socrates and his disciples and how Plato as his disciple and chronicler describes his conflict with oneself and the mentality of his followers on the mythological, political and philosophical meaning of death. In line with this topic, the article is divided into four sections. The first introduces the reader to the philosophical and religious meaning of death, and the second with disclosure of myths in dialogues, Euthyphro, judges, and Crito. In the third section, the authors outline why the dialogue with Phaedo is the most important of the dialogues on the issue of death. The fourth part of the article reveals the reasons why this interpretation is crucial for the later development of Guardini’s philosophical opus.","PeriodicalId":53889,"journal":{"name":"Bogoslovska Smotra-Ephemerides Theologicae Zagrabienses","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bogoslovska Smotra-Ephemerides Theologicae Zagrabienses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53745/bs.91.5.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors of the article have tried to present the experience of the closeness of death in Guardini’s interpretation of Plato’s dialogues between Socrates and his devoted disciples who could not accept the decision of their master and friend. Guardini’s interpretations were written as a philosophical analysis of the state of Socrates' mind, it is not a psychological analysis of his emotions or emotional states. Guardini wishes to reveal how Socrates faces the mystery of death as a philosopher. The authors focused on the dialogues between Socrates and his disciples and how Plato as his disciple and chronicler describes his conflict with oneself and the mentality of his followers on the mythological, political and philosophical meaning of death. In line with this topic, the article is divided into four sections. The first introduces the reader to the philosophical and religious meaning of death, and the second with disclosure of myths in dialogues, Euthyphro, judges, and Crito. In the third section, the authors outline why the dialogue with Phaedo is the most important of the dialogues on the issue of death. The fourth part of the article reveals the reasons why this interpretation is crucial for the later development of Guardini’s philosophical opus.
瓜迪尼,柏拉图和濒死边缘
这篇文章的作者试图在瓜迪尼对柏拉图的苏格拉底和他忠实的弟子之间的对话的解释中呈现死亡的亲密体验,他们不能接受他们的主人和朋友的决定。瓜迪尼的解释是对苏格拉底精神状态的哲学分析,而不是对他的情感或情绪状态的心理分析。瓜迪尼希望揭示苏格拉底作为一个哲学家是如何面对死亡之谜的。作者着重于苏格拉底和他的门徒之间的对话,以及柏拉图作为他的门徒和编年史者如何描述他与自己的冲突以及他的追随者对死亡的神话、政治和哲学意义的心态。根据这一主题,本文分为四个部分。第一篇向读者介绍了死亡的哲学和宗教意义,第二篇则在对话中揭示了神话,欧西弗罗,法官和克里托。在第三部分,作者概述了为什么与斐多的对话是关于死亡问题的对话中最重要的。文章的第四部分揭示了为什么这种解释对瓜迪尼哲学作品的后期发展至关重要的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信